PM Imran questions why Opposition approached SC after elections were announced

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan questioned the Opposition, asking why they approached the Supreme Court (SC) after fresh elections were announced.

His remarks came while holding a live Q&A session on Monday, during which he criticised the Opposition for running away from the elections, saying that the Opposition is scared of PTI’s popularity.

“When elections were announced, what is the Opposition doing in the Supreme Court? The Opposition wants an NRO,” he said in his opening remarks.

The premier said the country will never move towards development unless Parliament has people who actually think about the country’s betterment.

“We will give tickets to people with vision this time. We did not know how to contest in elections [earlier], but now we do,” the PM said.

Punjab Assembly likely to be dissolved soon: sources

LAHORE: After the abrupt dissolution of the National Assembly, Punjab Assembly is also likely to be dissolved soon, sources said Monday.

President Dr Arif Alvi dissolved the National Assembly on the advice of Prime Minister Imran Khan as the PTI government evaded the no-confidence motion against the premier.

Punjab Governor Omar Sarfaraz Cheema may ask former Punjab chief minister Usman Buzdar to take charge as caretaker Punjab CM, they added.

Meanwhile, the newly appointed Punjab governor has been summoned to Islamabad where he will meet Prime Minister Imran Khan today.

Sources close to the matter said that the premier would guide Cheema over the strategy to be applied next amid the ongoing political turmoil.

Meanwhile, PM Imran Khan also summoned Buzdar and PTI senator Mehmoodur Rasheed to the federal capital.

In the meeting, they will discuss options to deal with the political crisis in Punjab, while the two leaders will brief the prime minister over the numbers game in Punjab.

Cheema appointed new Punjab governor

PTI leader from Punjab Omar Sarfaraz Cheema has replaced Chaudhry Mohammad Sarwar as the new Punjab governor, soon after the latter was sacked on Sunday morning.

The federal government sacked Sarwar as political tensions reached a pinnacle ahead of the vote on the no-trust motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Sources within the federal government said that Sarwar has been removed from his post on PML-Q leader Chaudhry Parvez Elahi’s request, for allegedly campaigning for Hamza Shahbaz in the election of the chief minister.

The ex-governor, addressing a press conference shortly after being sacked, said if there is an foreign conspiracy against the incumbent government then it was electing Buzdar as the chief minister.

Sarwar said that despite having several prominent candidates, including Fawad Chaudhry, Imran Khan decided to pick Usman Buzdar as the chief minister — as only he could move Punjab towards the goal of “Naya Pakistan”.

“All of PTI workers — in Punjab, Pakistan — and the federal ministers complained to us whether this was the Pakistan that we wanted where the chief secretary and inspector general are changed every three months,” the former governor said.

Shahbaz Sharif calls out PM Imran Khan for imposing ‘civilian martial law’

ISLAMABAD: PML-N President Monday lashed out at Prime Minister Imran Khan for imposing ‘civilian martial law’ in the country, terming his move “unconstitutional”.

Addressing a press conference, flanked by PPP Chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and JUI-F leader Asad Mehmood, MQM-P Convener Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui, BNP-M Chief Akhtar Mengal and others, he said that PM Imran Khan, along with his party members, have blatantly challenged the Constitution of Pakistan.

April 3 will be remembered as a black day in the history of Pakistan,” he said, adding that PM Imran Khan imposed civilian martial law, while General Pervez Musharraf also took a similar unconstitutional decision on November 3, 2007.

He termed the four-year tenure of the former PTI-led government a period of “an individual government, totalitarian and fascist.”

Read more: What is Article 5 and does it apply to the no-trust move?

On March 24, speaker of the National Assembly Asad Qaiser granted leave to the no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan, according to the will of the House.

Recalling Sunday’s ruling of the NA deputy speaker regarding the no-confidence motion, he asked, “if Qasim Suri termed the motion as ‘unconstitutional’, why wasn’t it raised earlier?”

“PTI used Article 5 to prevent themselves from the embarrassment that they would have faced after their defeat in case of voting on the no-confidence motion,” Shahbaz said.

Shahbaz highlights flaws in ‘foreign letter’ controversy

Regarding the “foreign threat letter” controversy, the leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly said that Pakistan’s Ambassador Asad Majeed hosted a farewell dinner on March 16 and invited all US officials, even those who were accused by PM Imran Khan.”

Moreover, he added that, in his tweet, Asad Majeed thanked Donald Lu over good relations and cooperation.

“If the letter was dated March 7 and highlighted the involvement of Donald Lu, why was the ambassador acknowledging the US official during the dinner on March 16,” he highlighted, questioning why Lu was invited for the dinner if had threatened Pakistan.

The PML-N leader said that if they had received the “foreign letter” on March 7, then “why did they not highlight this issue earlier.”

“According to the speech given by the NA deputy speaker, all Opposition leaders became traitors,” he said, adding that yesterday’s NA proceedings made a joke of the constitution of Pakistan, laws and Parliament.

Regarding former information minister Fawad Chaudhry’s claims about challenging the speaker’s ruling, Shahbaz said: “It is right that no one can challenge the proceedings of the House but the Constitution was blatantly violated, does it have any protection?”

He said that the matter is in the Supreme Court and hence, “I will not talk much about it.”

PM Khan sabotaged constitution to protect his ego: Bilawal

PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari said: “PM Khan sabotaged the constitution to protect his ego”.

He added that PM Khan has no idea what happened.

He further added that the responsibility of protecting the constitution lies on the people of Pakistan and not just the parties.

Bilawal shared that PPP workers and supporters are happy that the rule of the “selected” government has finally ended; however, he said that political parties, like PPP, PML-N, etc, will never be happy if extra-constitutional steps are taken because “we abide by the laws of the constitution.”

“PM Imran Khan, President Arif Alvi, NA speaker and deputy speaker have all broken the laws in order to protect the ego of the premier,” he said, urging the people to decide what is more important the “constitution or PM Imran Khan’s ego.”

Bilawal urges SC to form full-court bench

Speaking about his grandfather, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, he said that today [April 4] is the day when Bhutto was assassinated and PPP has not been able to get justice on this issue.

He highlighted that the Supreme Court did not take notice of the martial laws imposed by General Zia-ul-Haq and General Pervez Musharraf but “we do hope that the SC takes notice of the unconstitutional act of PM Imran Khan.”

“We request the judiciary to form a full-court bench for this critical situation,” he requested, adding that the judiciary’s decision will determine the fate of the country.

Moreover, the PPP chairman added that if they want to hang them to death they can but before that, they should allow voting on a no-confidence motion.

“If we are unable to implement the laws according to the Constitution in the National Assembly then we won’t be able to do it in the country,” he maintained.

April 3 darkest day in history of Pakistan: JUI-F leader

“Yesterday [April 3] was the darkest day in the history of Pakistan,” JUI-F leader Maulana Asad Mahmood said, adding that PM Imran Khan is trying to pressurise the institutions.

Mahmood said that they [the joint Opposition] will not accept international pressure being imposed under the guise of a “threat letter”.

He suggested that the higher courts of Pakistan hold him PM Khan accountable for his statements regarding the credibility of judges.

PM Imran Khan ‘astonished’ over PDM’s reaction to election call

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan Sunday expressed “astonishment” over Pakistan Democratic Movement’s (PDM) reaction to his call for the general elections.

Taking to his Twitter handle, the premier wrote: “Astonished by the reaction of PDM to our calling for general elections.”

Recalling the claims made earlier, he said that they [the Opposition] have been crying “hoarse” about how our govt has failed [and] lost the support of the [people] so “why the fear of elections now?”

“Democrats go to the [people] for support,” he wrote, urging them to accept what has happened now.

The premier wrote: “Isn’t it better for PDM to accept elections rather than being part of a foreign conspiracy for regime change; and indulging in blatant purchasing of loyalties, thereby, destroying our nation’s moral fibre?”

Earlier, after successfully evading the Opposition’s no-confidence motion citing a foreign conspiracy and ordering the president of the country to dissolve the National Assembly, PM Imran Khan also talked to his party leaders and poked fun at the Opposition.

“The Opposition is still unable to understand what happened today,” the premier said while laughing.

PM Imran Khan continued: “Last night, you all were trying not to panic. The Opposition is clueless about the situation right now. If I had disclosed what I was about to do yesterday, they wouldn’t have been shocked.”

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky delivered a powerful pre-taped message to the Grammy Awards on Sunday evening.

“Our musicians wear body armour instead of tuxedos,” he told stars including Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber, referring to the ongoing war with Russia.

“They sing to the wounded in hospitals, even to those who can’t hear them. But the music will break through.”

He urged musicians to “fill the silence” left by Russian bombs “with your music”.

“Support us in any way you can, but not with your silence,” he continued. “Fill the silence with music.”

The video message was played ahead of a performance by John Legend of a new song, called Free.

The US star was joined on-stage by Ukrainian musicians Mika Newton and Suzanna Iglidan, while a poem was read by their compatriot Lyuba Yakimchuk, who recently fled the country.

(Left to right) Mika Newton, John Legend, and Siuzanna Iglidan performed onstage during the 64th Grammy Awards at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas on Sunday

Rain down freedom until we’re all free” sang Legend, who was also accompanied by a gospel choir, as images of those affected by the conflict played out on screens behind him.

At the end of the track, viewers were given the details of a charity helping Ukrainian refugees.

Prior to Legend’s performance Mr Zelensky asked: “What’s more opposite to music?… The silence of ruined cities and killed people.

“The war doesn’t let us choose who survives and who stays in eternal silence,” he added, but spoke of his country defending its freedom “to live, to love, to sound”.

He signed off his video message by saying he hoped his countrymen and women could soon “be free like the people on the Grammy stage”.

Since the conflict began in February, many Ukrainian musicians, producers and DJs have joined the fight against Russia, and also found themselves acting as war reporters and military fundraisers.

In October, Donald Trump announced he was planning to launch a revolutionary technology company.

“I created Truth Social… to stand up to the tyranny of big tech,” he said.

“We live in a world where the Taliban has a huge presence on Twitter yet your favourite American president has been silenced.”

The app launched on Presidents’ Day, 21 February, but six weeks later is beset by problems. A waiting list of nearly 1.5 million are unable to use it.

Number 1,419,631

Truth Social looks a lot like Twitter, a platform that banned Mr Trump after a mob of his supporters attacked the United States Capitol Building.

Twitter believed Donald Trump, by making false claims the election had been “stolen”, had incited violence. He was banned for life on 8 January, 2021.

Truth Social might look like Twitter, but it isn’t available on Android phones, web browsers or, apparently, to most people outside the US.

“It’s been a disaster,” Joshua Tucker, director of NYU’s Center for Social Media and Politics, said.

And a Republican ally of Mr Trump’s, who did not wish to be identified, said: “Nobody seems to know what’s going on.”

On 21 February, Truth Social was one of the App Store’s most downloaded apps – but many who downloaded it were unable to use it.

There was an assumption this problem would soon be resolved and Mr Trump would start posting his “truths” in the coming days – but neither of those things happened.

My attempt to register, this week, was placed at number 1,419,631 on the waiting list.

1px transparent line

While YouTube, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are among the 10 most downloaded apps, according to Similar Web, Truth Social is outside the top 100.

Users who find their way in can find the app a little empty, as many big voices on the American right have so far stayed away.

Another study found downloads have fallen by as much as 95%.

And many are feeling frustrated.

“Signed up for Truth Social a couple weeks ago and still on a waiting list,” one Twitter user said, on Tuesday.

“By the time I’m off the waiting list and on to Truth Social for real, Trump will be President again,” joked another.

Baffled experts

Truth Social chief executive Devin Nunes said its goal was to be “fully operational” by the end of March.

But quite why the app is having so many problems has baffled experts.

Some have pointed to Truth Social’s partnership with Rumble, a video-sharing platform that looks a bit like YouTube.

Popular with conservatives and the far right, Rumble was supposed to provide a “critical backbone” for the site’s infrastructure.

But if Truth Social is having server problems, why has it taken so long to fix?

“It should take a few days to fix, not six weeks,” a Republican source close to Mr Trump said.

“There’s always going to be hiccups at the beginning – but at this point, I would have thought it would have been resolved.

“Nobody seems to understand why.”

Rival competitors

Mr Trump is said to be furious, asking why more people are not using Truth Social.

He has about 750,000 followers but has not posted a “truth” for well over a month.

Mr Trump’s last Truth Social post was mid-February

“Maybe they’re holding him back,” Mr Tucker said.

“That’s his last chance to launch it – when suddenly Trump comes in and starts being really active on it, that will get a buzz.”

Much maligned, Truth Social could still rival competitors such as Gab and Gettr.

Mr Trump retains star quality and any “free speech” app would bend over backwards to have him on its platform.

But at the moment, Truth Social has become a little embarrassing.

A platform supposed to stand up to Silicon Valley’s heavyweights has barely been able to get to its feet.

At least six people have been killed and 12 injured in a shooting in the centre of Sacramento, police in California’s state capital say.

People fled through the streets after rapid gunfire rang out in an area packed with restaurants and bars in the early hours of Sunday.

Police nearby responded to the gunfire and came across a “very large crowd”, police chief Katherine Lester said.

No suspect is yet in custody in the wake of the shootings.

“This is a really tragic situation,” Chief Lester said.

The officer said investigators had arrived at the scene and urged the public to come forward with any information that might help identify those responsible.

Sacramento city councillor Katie Valenzuela: “I’m heartbroken and I’m outraged”

The shooting took place at around 02:00 (09:00 GMT) near the junction of 10th Street and K Street, in an area that leads to the Golden One Center, where the Sacramento Kings play basketball.

It is also only a few streets from the state Capitol building.

Pamela Harris said her daughter called her at 02:15 to say that her 38-year-old son, Sergio, had been shot and killed outside a nightclub.

“She said he was dead. I just collapsed,” Harris told Reuters at the scene of the shooting.

“I cannot leave here now until I know what’s going on. I’m not going anywhere. It seems like a dream.”

Kay Harris, 32, said she was asleep when one of her family members called to say they thought her brother had been killed. She said she thought he was at London, a nightclub on 10th Street, the Associated Press reports.

She said she has been to the club a few times and described it as a place for “the younger crowd”.

Pamela Harris went to the crime scene on Sunday for news of her son

Community activist Berry Accius reached the scene at about 02:30 after a city council member called him about the shooting.

“The first thing I saw was like victims,” he was quoted as saying by CBS News.

“I saw a young girl with a whole bunch of blood in her body, a girl taking off glass from her, a young girl screaming saying, ‘They killed my sister.’ A mother running up, ‘Where’s my son, has my son been shot?'”

The incident is certain to inflame the ongoing debate about gun violence and the prevalence of lethal weapons in US society.

Mayor Darrell Steinberg tweeted that the numbers of dead and wounded were “difficult to comprehend”.

“Rising gun violence is the scourge of our city, state and nation, and I support all actions to reduce it,” he said.

In a tearful statement to reporters, city council member Katie Valenzuela – who represents the district where the shooting happened – said: “I’m heartbroken and I’m outraged.”

“Our community deserves better than this,” she said, pledging to do whatever she can so young people “don’t get shot down on K Street when they’re out trying to have a good time”.

Firearms are involved in approximately 40,000 deaths a year in the US, including suicides, according to the Gun Violence Archive website.

Economist Rodrigo Chaves has won the presidential election in Costa Rica, preliminary results suggest.

The 60-year-old ran on a promise of shaking up traditional party politics in the Central American nation.

With almost all votes counted, he had a lead of more than five percentage points over ex-President José María Figueres.

Turnout was the lowest in decades as voters expressed discontent with Costa Rica’s struggling economy.

Supporters of Mr Chaves said they wanted a fresh start

José María Figueres, who ran for a second term as president after having held the top job from 1994 to 1998, admitted defeat once his rival’s lead had become too big to be overcome.

Many Costa Ricans said they were looking for a break with the politicians of the past, a trend which went against Mr Figueres, who comes from one of the country’s most influential political families.

While Mr Chaves is not entirely new to politics – he did serve in the outgoing government of President Carlos Alvarado as economy minister for six months – he has emphasised his plan to break with what he calls “privileges” of Costa Rica’s established political parties.

Rodrigo Chaves has moved away from the country’s traditional political parties and presented himself as a maverick and an outsider to the established order.

He has said he is prepared to use referendums to bypass Congress and shake up the usual stable political system in the Central American nation.

In large part, he benefited from widespread discontent in the country, as Costa Ricans are frustrated at what they see as worsening corruption in a country whose tourism-based economy has been badly affected by the coronavirus pandemic.

Following an at times acrimonious campaign, Mr Chaves struck a conciliatory note as his win became clear.

“Tonight, let’s set aside the party colours that can easily divide us,” he told his supporters. “I humbly ask you that we unite beneath the blue, white and red of our national flag.”

Supporters of Mr Chaves took to the streets of the capital, San José, to celebrate their candidate’s win.

One of those celebrating told Reuters news agency that there was a “hunger for real change” in Costa Rica. “We need new faces to save the country,” the man said.

Hungary’s nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban has won a fourth term by a landslide in the country’s general election, near-complete results show.

His right-wing Fidesz party had 53.1% of votes with 98% counted, preliminary results show.

The opposition alliance led by Peter Marki-Zay was far behind with 35%.

In his victory speech, Mr Orban criticised Brussels bureaucrats and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, calling them “opponents”.

Mr Zelensky has repeatedly criticised Mr Orban’s ban on the transfer of arms to Ukraine, with which it shares a border. However, Mr Orban – who has close ties with Moscow – has condemned the Russian invasion, and taken in half a million refugees since the war began in February.

“We never had so many opponents,” he said cited by AFP. “Brussels bureaucrats… the international mainstream media, and the Ukrainian president.”

Mr Orban added that his “huge victory” could be seen “from the Moon, but certainly from Brussels as well”.

When officially confirmed by Hungary’s electoral commission, the victory will be Fidesz’s fourth successive win since 2010. The National Election Office said Fidesz would have 135 seats, a two-thirds majority, and the opposition alliance would have 56 seats – again, based on preliminary results.

Mr Orban, 58, has had a fraught relationship with the EU, which considers that Fidesz has undermined Hungary’s democratic institutions.

In his 12 years in power, Mr Orban has rewritten the constitution, filled the top courts with his appointees, and changed the electoral system to his advantage.

During campaigning, the opposition’s catch-phrase was “Orban or Europe”.

Their candidate Peter Marki-Zay argued that Hungary should join Poland, the UK and others in supplying arms to Ukraine. And if called upon, and only within a Nato framework, should even consider sending troops.

The opposition complained that Fidesz had isolated Hungary from the European mainstream, and from consensual democracy, fairness and decency.

You could almost hear the collective thud of EU hearts sinking last night.

A self-styled illiberal democrat, Hungary’s leader has repeatedly clashed with Brussels over rule of law issues such as press freedom and migration.

They’ve fallen out over Moscow too. Mr Orban is famed for his warm relations with Vladimir Putin. He signed up to Western sanctions – but refuses to supply Ukraine with weapons. He’s the only EU leader to openly criticise President Zelensky.

Hungary is becoming increasingly isolated in the EU and Nato – but Mr Orban knows neither institution is keen to ostracise him. They want a show of Western unity to display to Russia.

His new term in office means he’ll remain an unpredictable thorn in their side.

More than 200 international observers monitored the election in Hungary, along with thousands of volunteers from across the political spectrum.

Turnout hit 68.69%, almost matching the record number of voters in the last national elections in 2018.

Mr Marki-Zay, the conservative opposition leader, conceded defeat late on Sunday evening.

“I will not hide my sadness and my disappointment,” he told supporters, accusing Fidesz of running a campaign of “hate and lies”.

He claimed the opposition had done “everything humanly possible” but that the campaign had been “an unequal fight” as anti-Fidesz politicians got so little showing in state media.

Sri Lanka’s cabinet ministers have resigned en masse after protests over the government’s handling of the worst economic crisis in decades.

All 26 ministers submitted letters of resignation – but not Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa or his brother, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Many angry protesters demanding the resignation of the Rajapaksa family say the move is meaningless.

On Sunday, many defied a curfew to take to the streets in several cities.

The country is grappling with what is said to be its worst economic crisis since independence from the UK in 1948.

It is caused in part by a lack of foreign currency, which is used to pay for fuel imports. With power cuts lasting half a day or more, and shortages of food, medicines and fuel, public anger has reached a new high.

Education Minister Dinesh Gunawardena told reporters on Sunday that the cabinet’s ministers had tendered their resignation letters to the prime minister.

The prime minister’s own son, Namal Rajapaksa, was among those who resigned, tweeting that he hoped it would help the president and PM’s “decision to establish stability for the people and the government”.

However, many protesters who allege that the president and his family are to blame for the situation in the country are angry at the fact that he will remain in power.

Another called it a “play from the dictator’s playbook”.

“We want all of you gone – the Rajapaksas, the cabinet,their political henchman, the corrupt cronies, their media guys. All of them,” another social media user added.

On Sunday, thousands of people across the country defied a curfew order and a special notification banning anyone from from being on any public road, in a park, on trains or on the seashore unless they have written permission from the authorities.

The curfew, along with a ban on social media sites including Facebook, WhatsApp and Twitter, was meant to halt a planned day of protests, after a demonstration outside the president’s house on Thursday night turned violent.

Protesters confronted security forces in Colombo on Sunday

The demonstrations mark a massive turnaround in popularity for Mr Rajapaksa who swept into power with a majority win in 2019, promising stability and a “strong hand” to rule the country

I met opposition leader Sajith Premadasa at another impromptu protest on Sunday, where he along with other members of his party were stopped at police barricades as they tried to enter the city’s Independence square.

“The supreme law of the land protects the right of the people to share their opinions, to demonstrate and to engage in peaceful democratic activities, so that right cannot be violated,” he said, adding that the curfew and social media ban were dictatorial, autocratic and draconian steps.

I also met several people who had defied the curfew to come out and protest.

Suchitra was one of dozens gathered at a protest outside an Asian restaurant by what’s usually a busy road.

As he cradled his 15 month-old baby boy, who shares his name, Suchitra told me about the daily problems he faced with power cuts.

“Without electricity our fans don’t even work. In this heat it’s impossible for the baby, or us, to sleep.”

“I came out today because my rights have been taken away, and I’m very angry,” said Anjalee Wandurgala, one of a few hundred students who gathered in a part of Colombo.

“Why have they put this curfew? Is it to protect us?” she asked. “It doesn’t make sense at all”.

Freelance advertising copywriter Sathsara says it is the first time he has ever protested.

“I’m freelance, but I can’t earn money as there’s no gas, no electricity. I’m totally broke,” he says.

He’s one of many young Sri Lankans struggling to see a way forward through this crisis.

“We are at the prime of our lives, how are we going to achieve our dreams with all this happening?”