The apex court directed the Islamabad inspector general of police to submit by Monday a report on the storming of Sindh House by PTI supporters yesterday. It said hearings on the petition would be conducted on a daily basis.

A two-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Munib Akhtar, heard the petition that was filed by the SCBA earlier this week in which it urged the top court to direct all state functionaries as well as political stakeholders to allow peaceful execution of proceedings for the no-confidence vote in the National Assembly against the prime minister and prevent a possible “anarchic situation” that could result from the government and opposition clashing with each other.

During the hearing today, Justice Bandial said the SCBA had approached the court and wanted enforcement of the law. The CJP asked Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Khalid Jawed Khan if he also wanted to approach the court, to which the AGP replied that a decision had been made to file a presidential reference on Article 63(A) — which deals with disqualification of parliamentarians over defection — by Monday.

The chief justice said the SCBA wanted public order and implementation of Article 95 of the Constitution, which is related to the no-confidence vote against the prime minister. He clarified the hearing was not a suo moto proceeding as the court had previously received an application.

“What would you say on the freedom of expression and the right to protest? What would you say on yesterday’s incident?” Justice Bandial inquired from the AGP, referring to the storming of Sindh House.

The CJP said the incident went against the freedom of speech, to which the AGP agreed, saying that there was no justification for it. Khan said he wanted to elaborate on the background of yesterday’s incident.

He informed the court that 100 protesters had been dispersed by the police from Sindh House, following which 20 people again came to the location to protest. He said 13 of them were arrested for attacking Sindh House and a case was registered in Secretariat police station.

“Today, a magistrate released the 13 protesters,” he said.

“We are not concerned with what is happening. We are here for the Constitution’s implementation,” the chief justice remarked.

He asked whether attacking public property was a bailable offence. “Public property and national institutions were threatened. Members [of the National Assembly] and institutions should be protected in accordance with the Constitution,” Justice Bandial said.

The apex court said that it would not interfere in political matters but legal matters would have to be looked into.

Directing the Islamabad IGP to submit a report on the Sindh House incident by Monday, the chief justice observed, “Sindh House was damaged. All political parties will act in accordance with the law. They should not take any action which is against the law.”

The court directed that the process of the no-confidence vote should continue under Article 95.

Regarding the government’s decision to seek the court’s opinion on Article 63(A), Justice Bandial said the SC would hear the matter after the presidential reference was filed. “The court has to look at the Constitution rather than the political situation,” the CJP observed.

A day earlier, PTI workers stormed the Sindh House in Islamabad after protesting outside for hours against dissident MNAs who are staying in the building.

Television footage showed PTI workers climbing over the walls of Sindh House with some of them later breaking down the doors to enter the building. They also carried lotas in protest against “turncoats”.

Read: Storming of the Sindh House

The petition

The SCBA’s petition, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, comes amid a heated political situation with the government and opposition trading barbs at each other and threatening to flex muscles in roadshows ahead of a crucial vote later this month that would decide the fate of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

The two sides have announced to hold rallies in the capital ahead of the parliament session, prompting fears of political instability and anarchy that the SCBA expressed in its petition.

In the plea filed with the Supreme Court on Thursday, the SCBA cited statements from the prime minister wherein he had said “I will fight against them until [my last breath]. I will face them and I am completely prepared for whatever [they throw my way]”.

It also included statements by Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry, telling lawmakers that they would have to pass through a million PTI supporters to enter the National Assembly on the day of the vote.

Likewise, the petition also quoted statements from opposition leaders including JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman when he appealed to his workers to converge in Islamabad before the session “and stay on the Constitution Avenue till voting on the no-trust resolution and … provide safe passage to members to the Parliament House”.

The prime minister, the federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Defence secretary, leader of the opposition in the National Assembly, National Assembly secretary, Islamabad chief commissioner, Islamabad deputy commissioner and Islamabad police chief have been made respondents in the plea.

The petition says circumstances involving confrontation between the government and the opposition could trigger an “anarchic situation” in the country.

“It is evident from the political history of our country that preventing the constitutional process from taking its course has produced dire consequence for democracy and rule of law,” the petition says.

The SCBA sought the court’s directions for all state functionaries “to act strictly in accordance with the Constitution and the law and they be restrained from acting in any manner detrimental to and unwarranted by the Constitution and the law”.

It also demanded that officials tasked with the responsibility to maintain law and order in Islamabad must “prevent any assembly, gathering, public meetings and/or processions that could hamper the assembly proceedings or participation of members in the session”.

The plea also urged the court to bar authorities from taking any “coercive measures against, and including arrest and detention of the, members of the National Assembly”.