Across Australia household budgets are being tightly squeezed, with the cost of living soaring to an eye-watering 21 year high.

Rising prices will be a pivotal concern for voters as they head to the polls on Saturday.

Although not surging as high as in other countries at 5.1%, Australia’s inflation rate is outstripping wage growth (2.3%) meaning people have less money in their pockets every month.

In the Sydney suburb of Lakemba, 12 kilometres (seven miles) from the centre of the nation’s biggest city, almost everyone I meet is worried about the rising cost of rent, food, fuel, and other essentials.

“I am a single mum with two kids. The childcare – everything – is very expensive. (It is) stressful sometimes,” says Diana, who lives nearby.

Meanwhile, at a busy grocery shop she runs on the main street, Summer Hamze is organising deliveries. She tells me that many of her customers can barely keep up with the price rises she’s forced to pass on from her suppliers.

Climbing inflation is outpacing growth in earnings

“With the inflation, actually, we do need the government to get that under control because it is out of control,” she tells the BBC. “It is just rising and rising and rising, and people are getting really scared these days.”

Given inflation is largely being driven by market forces such as higher global shipping and energy prices, in Lakemba, opinion is divided over how much can be done by the next government.

“It is in their hands, because they know the economic factors, everything,” says one man. “So, they know how to handle the situation.”

Whereas another passer-by disagreed.

Rising petrol prices are leaving Australians with less disposable income

“Nah, I don’t think anyone can do anything,” he says. “Even if they change the government, I don’t think anything will happen because the banks will do their thing.”

Earlier this month, Australia’s Reserve Bank (RBA) increased interest rates (by 0.25% to 0.35%) for the first time in more than 11 years – the first hike in the middle of an election campaign since 2007.

Rates were held at historic lows during the Covid-19 pandemic in a bid to encourage Australians to keep spending. But as inflation surges and the economic recovery post-Covid gets underway, the RBA is applying the brakes to stop the economy overheating. It is making money more expensive to borrow.

More interest rate increases are expected in the months ahead. That’s good for savers, but it’s estimated that 300,000 Australians could default on their mortgages as repayments increase.

Key economic decisions are outsourced to independent bodies such as the RBA which sets official interest rates

So, whichever candidate wins the election at the weekend they will have to navigate choppy economic waters.

Scott Morrison, the prime minister, whose centre-right coalition has been in power for almost a decade, has slammed his main challenger, opposition candidate, Anthony Albanese, as a “loose unit” on the economy

“It is like he just unzips his head and let’s everything fall on the table. That is no way to run an economy,” thundered Mr Morrison.

In response, Labor leader Anthony Albanese said the Australian economy was “crying out for leadership and reform” but was getting neither from the current administration. Mr Albanese wants an increase to the minimum wage of at least 5.1%, to keep pace with inflation.

Almost two-thirds of Australians say reducing the cost-of-living should be the top priority for the next government, according to recent analysis.

Professor Nicholas Biddle from the Australian National University (ANU) says rising prices were “high on the minds” of many voters of various political persuasions.

“This outranks all other major policy considerations,” he says. “Interestingly, we found this was a view held by people who said they would vote for Labor, for people who said they would vote for (Scott Morrison’s) Coalition and for those who weren’t planning on voting for either party”.

Fixing Australia’s nursing home system for older people and strengthening the nation’s economy were the other top priorities among more than 3,500 voters surveyed by the ANU.

Key economic decisions have been outsourced to independent bodies (such as the RBA, which sets official interest rates), or are dictated by the demand and supply of goods and services, both in Australia and overseas.

The Australian economy may need a shot in the arm to spur the Covid bounceback further

But the national government does wield considerable influence on the fate of the economy through its tax and spending policies, for example. Massive wage subsidies and other stimulus measures during the darkest days of the pandemic did protect jobs and businesses in Australia.

However, with three-year parliamentary terms in Canberra, some academics argue that federal politicians can be distracted by almost constant electioneering and exaggerate their control over the economy.

“One of the problems Australia has is its short parliaments, which means they are almost perpetually in this cycle of gathering votes.

“If a government is always worrying about the political cycle then when do they have time to knuckle down and really get things done,” says Michelle Baddeley, a professor of economics at the University of Technology, Sydney.

“I think, yes, there is a bit of claiming more ground than they really can control,” she says. “The reality is a bit of a mixture because certainly, and Covid illustrated this pretty well, governments can do a lot in terms of spending money to generate employment in the short-term.”

Australia has a small, open economy that thrives on confidence.

And ultimately, it’s individuals that collectively power an economy, but governments with vision are able to foster enterprise, innovation, and prosperity.

“There is a lot of catching up to do in terms of growth, in terms of opportunity, and, indeed government can set the pace,” explains Peter Khoury, from the NRMA, a large motoring and transport company.

“As long as there is confidence in the economy and in the strength of the economy, Australian entrepreneurs and businesses will invest.”

“Economically speaking, Australia will come out of Covid better than most countries. So, you don’t want to miss that opportunity,” he adds.

Australians voters will soon decide who they trust to help steer their country through the recovery – and beyond – for the next three years.

Sweden and Finland have the “full, total and complete backing” of the US in their decision to apply for Nato membership, President Joe Biden says.

Both countries submitted their applications to be part of the Western defence alliance this week, marking a major shift in European geopolitics.

To join the alliance, the two nations need the support of all 30 Nato member states.

But the move by the Nordic nations has been opposed by Turkey.

Speaking alongside Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson and Finnish President Sauli Niinisto at the White House on Thursday, Mr Biden called Sweden and Finland’s applications “a watershed moment in European security”.

“New members joining Nato is not a threat to any nation,” he said. The president added that having two new members in the “high north” would “enhance the security of our allies and deepen our security co-operation across the board”.

Russia has repeatedly said it sees Nato as a threat and has warned of “consequences” if the block proceeds with its expansion plans.

War in Ukraine: More coverage

 

Turkey has accused both Sweden and Finland of hosting suspected militants from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), a group it views as a terrorist organisation.

However, both Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg and British Defence Minister Ben Wallace have expressed confidence that these concerns will eventually be addressed.

Mr Biden’s comments came as the US Senate voted to approve a new $40bn (£32bn) bill to provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. It is the biggest emergency aid package so far for Ukraine.

The bill – which was passed by the House of Representatives with broad bipartisan support on 10 May – was expected to be passed earlier this week, but was blocked by Kentucky Republican Rand Paul over a dispute about spending oversight.

But the Republican’s Senate leader Mitch McConnell dismissed these concerns and told reporters that Congress had a “moral responsibility” to support “a sovereign democracy’s self-defence”.

“Anyone concerned about the cost of supporting a Ukrainian victory should consider the much larger cost should Ukraine lose,” Mr McConnell said.

Last week, Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken urged Congress to approve the package and warned that the US military only had enough funds to send weapons to Kyiv until 19 May.

Watch: Sweden and Finland formally submit Nato applications

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky praised the aid package as “a significant US contribution to the restoration of peace and security in Ukraine, Europe and the world”.

The package brings the total US aid delivered to Ukraine to more than $50bn, including $6bn for security assistance such as training, equipment, weapons and support.

Another $8.7bn will be allocated to replenish stocks of US equipment already sent to Ukraine.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been told he faces no further action after police closed their investigation into Downing Street parties, No 10 says.

Mr Johnson’s wife, Carrie, will also not receive a second fine.

They were both issued with £50 Fixed Penalty Notices last month for breaking Covid laws at a birthday party for Mr Johnson in Downing Street in June 2020.

The Metropolitan Police said the inquiry into lockdown breaches in and around Downing Street had now ended.

It issued a total of 126 fines to 83 people, for events happening across eight different dates.

It had been widely expected that Mr Johnson, who reportedly attended up to six of the gatherings investigated, would be fined again.

Police examined 510 photographs, as well as CCTV images, emails, logs of entries into buildings, diary entries and witness statements.

They also studied 204 questionnaires from people who had attended events.

Following the investigation, the UK’s top civil servant, Cabinet Secretary Simon Case, has been told he will not be fined, sources have told the BBC.

In December, he was forced to step aside from his role leading an inquiry into lockdown parties, after it emerged an event had been held in his own office.

The ending of the police investigation paves the way for the publication of the full report by senior civil servant Sue Gray, who took over the inquiry into lockdown gatherings from Mr Case. This is expected to happen next week.

The Metropolitan Police’s Helen Ball on Partygate inquiry: “We carried out an impartial investigation.”

An interim version of Ms Gray’s report, published in January, criticised “failures of leadership and judgement” in No 10 and the Cabinet Office.

Some Conservative MPs have previously said they are reserving judgement on Mr Johnson’s future until the final document is published.

The BBC is aware of about 20 who have called for a vote of confidence in Mr Johnson’s leadership over the Partygate revelations.

Mr Johnson also still faces investigation by a Commons committee over claims he misled Parliament about parties during lockdown.

Some are wondering how Boris Johnson managed not to accumulate one or two more fines.

But we now know that isn’t going to happen. The Metropolitan Police’s role in all this is done.

You might be reading this boiling with anger about what went on. Or perhaps you are past caring, or never really cared at all.

But this mattered: morally to some, legally to others and politically to plenty, and it still does.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said the number of fines showed there had been “industrial-scale lawbreaking in Downing Street”.

He added that his opinion of the prime minister had not changed and that “of course he should resign”.

A separate inquiry by Durham police into whether Sir Keir broke Covid laws at a Labour campaign event in the city in 2021 remains ongoing.

Sir Keir has pledged he will quit as Labour leader if he receives a Fixed Penalty Notice over that event.

Sir Keir Starmer on police ending Downing Street parties inquiry

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: “The full Sue Gray report should now be published without delay, and the parliamentary inquiry should be launched into Johnson’s lies.

“The public made huge sacrifices while Boris Johnson partied. They deserve the full truth.”

The end of the police inquiry means the prime minister has not been fined for a garden party in Downing Street he attended in May 2020, to which about 100 people were invited.

The Met confirmed other people had been fined over their presence at this event.

Mr Johnson has previously apologised for attending the garden party for 25 minutes, saying he “believed implicitly” it was a work event.

The gatherings that resulted in fines took place between May 2020 and April 2021, with different Covid rules in place at different times.

Acting Met Police Deputy Commissioner Helen Ball said whether an event had taken place in “someone’s home” or not had been a factor in deciding whether to issue fines.

The Met said it would not be identifying any recipients of fines from its investigation, which had involved 12 detectives and cost £460,000, and that there had been no interviews under caution.

Eight new cities are being created for the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, with at least one in every UK nation – and on the Falkland Islands and Isle of Man.

Milton Keynes in England, Dunfermline in Scotland, Bangor in Northern Ireland and Wrexham in Wales all get the title.

It is a first for places in an Overseas Territory – Stanley, in the Falklands – and a crown dependency – Douglas, in the Isle of Man – to win city status.

Colchester and Doncaster complete the list getting the royal honour.

Applicants had to show their cultural heritage and royal links.

The Platinum Jubilee civic honours competition also required places to show how their local identity and communities meant they deserved to be granted city status.

The new cities can expect a boost to local communities and open up new opportunities for people who live there, the Cabinet Office said.

It cited research that suggested previous winner Perth, in Scotland, saw the local economy expand by 12% in the decade it was granted city status, after it put them on the international map as a place to do business.

The last competition to win civic honours in 2012 marked the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee. For the first time this year, Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories were allowed to apply.

The announcement of the latest civic honours takes the number of official cities in mainland UK to 76, with 55 in England, eight in Scotland, seven in Wales and six in Northern Ireland.

The winners and details from their bids for city status include:

Bangor, County Down, Northern Ireland

Due to its location at the mouth of the Belfast Lough, Bangor was a key site for the Allies during the Second World War
  • Due to its location at the mouth of the Belfast Lough, Bangor, with a population of 61,011, was a key site for the Allies during the Second World War
  • In May 1944, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces Dwight D Eisenhower, who later became US president, gave a speech to 30,000 assembled troops in Bangor shortly before ships left for Normandy and the D-Day landings
  • The Queen and Duke of Edinburgh visited Bangor Castle in 1961 and, after lunching at the Royal Ulster Yacht Club that day, the duke took part in a regatta race

Colchester, Essex, England

Colchester Castle was built on the foundations of a Roman temple
  • Colchester, with a population of 119,441, is Britain’s first recorded settlement and its first capital
  • It has been a garrison town for the past 165 years and for the past 21 years has been home to 16 Air Assault Brigade, the UK’s rapid response force

Doncaster, South Yorkshire, England

The Flying Scotsman locomotive was built in Doncaster
  • Originally a Roman settlement, Doncaster, which has a population of 110,000, is almost 2,000 years old
  • Noted for its railway heritage, the Flying Scotsman and the Mallard locomotives were both built there
  • It is also home to the St Leger flat course, which was founded in 1776 and is the oldest classic horse race in the world. The Queen and other royals throughout history have attended the St Leger festival
  • After Doncaster was hit by flooding in 2019, locals showed their community spirit in the relief effort

Douglas, Isle of Man

Douglas is the island’s main port
  • The Queen is patron of the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) which started in Douglas, which has a population of 26,677 (2021 census)
  • Its Royal Hall plays host to annual flagship concerts by the Isle of Man Symphony Orchestra, the Isle of Man Choral Society and the Manx Last Night of the Proms

Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland

Dunfermline’s most famous son is Andrew Carnegie,whose steel industry helped build America
  • Its annual fireworks display attracts some 30,000 local people, while the Christmas light event packed the town centre with 10,000 people
  • Dunfermline’s most famous son is Andrew Carnegie whose steel industry helped build America. His philanthropy started the world’s public library system, and he gave away the equivalent of £65bn in today’s money
  • Dunfermline, with a population of 58,508 was one of the seats of the kings of Scotland in the middle ages. Robert the Bruce was buried in Dunfermline Abbey after his death in 1329

Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, England

Milton Keynes is the home of MK Dons, formed in 2004
  • It was created in 1967 to alleviate housing shortages in overcrowded London
  • With an urban area population of 171,750 (2011 census), it has 27 conservation areas, 50 scheduled monuments, 1,100 listed buildings and 270 works of public art
  • The Open University, the world’s first degree-awarding, distance learning institution, was set up in Milton Keynes in 1967; and its University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust established the nation’s first independent medical school
  • Milton Keynes is also the home of MK Dons football club, formed in 2004 after Wimbledon relocated there

Stanley, Falkland Islands

The Whalebone arch in Stanley was erected in 1933 to mark a century of British administration
  • Members of the Royal Family have regularly visited the islands, including the late Duke of Edinburgh in 1957. In 2016, the Duke of Cambridge spent six weeks on the islands as a search and rescue helicopter pilot
  • Holidays and events specific to the islands, which had a population of 2,458 in 2016 (according to its most recent census), are held annually – such as Peat Cutting Monday. The sacrifices made during the Falklands War are also remembered – 2022 marks 40 years since the conflict

Wrexham, north east Wales

Wrexham has tried to become a city three times since 2000
  • Established in 1864, Wrexham Football Club is among the oldest professional football clubs in the UK and is owned by Hollywood stars – the actor Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney, creator of It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
  • The area, with a population of 61,603, is home to the Pontcysyllte Aqueduct, a Unesco World Heritage site
  • A range of businesses and industries are based there, including JCB, Kellogg’s and aerospace firms including Magellen and Cytec

Almost 40 locations submitted bids for city status when applications opened last year.

City status is often associated with having a cathedral, university, or large population, but there are no set rules for being granted the status, which is awarded by the monarch on advice of ministers.

Chelmsford, in England, Lisburn in Northern Ireland and Newport in Wales were among previous winners of the competition for city status – which has taken place during each of the last three jubilee years.

Each new city will receive the award formally through a Letters Patent, which will be presented later in the year.

Meanwhile, the city of Southampton has won the competition for Lord Mayoralty status – which means the mayor can be called Lord Mayor – joining the ranks of previous Jubilee competition winners including Chester, Exeter and Armagh.

In October, it was announced that Southend in Essex would become a city after the death of Sir David Amess, one of the town’s MPs, who often championed its campaign for the status.

Former German chancellor stripped of his office over Putin ‘lobbying’

It is custom for all Germany’s leaders to get a state-funded office when they leave government, but the three parties that make up current Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s governing coalition have agreed a parliamentary motion to close Schroeder’s.

They have taken the decision after his refusal to condemn Putin, whom he still calls a close personal friend despite Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

German Finance Minister Christian Lindner said it was unthinkable that “a former chancellor who is now openly doing lobby work for the criminal rule of Vladimir Putin is still given an office by taxpayers,” in an interview with Welt TV.

German media has reported that Schroeder, 78, earns sums from jobs at Russian state-owned energy companies that dwarf the 400,000 euros the German state spends on the office.

“The budgetary committee observes that former Chancellor Schroeder no longer carries out any duties that result from his former office,” the parties’ joint motion read.

“The office will therefore be closed.” Schroeder’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The move does not affect the 7,000-euro per month pension the ex-chancellor draws.

Schroeder, a Social Democrat like Scholz, is the living figure most closely associated with Germany’s “change through trade” policy, a doctrine that held close economic ties were the best way to tame and integrate Europe’s giant eastern neighbour.

But critics say the war in Ukraine is a spectacular illustration of that policy’s failure and blame Schroeder, who as chancellor sponsored the building of more gas pipelines, for deepening Germany’s energy dependence on a neighbour that has now turned hostile.

Schroeder has always said that his ties to Putin are an essential channel of communication to a man the world cannot afford to ignore. A trip to Moscow to plead with Putin to end the war yielded no obvious results, however.

Dissatisfaction at Schroeder’s stance has affected his own closest colleagues: the four staff in his bureau all asked for new assignments within days of the war starting.

Any remaining staff will now be charged with winding the office down, and its files will be preserved for the state archives, according to the motion.

Delhi turning occupied Kashmir into surveillance state

SRINAGAR: In Indian occupied Kashmir, shopkeepers are spending hundreds of dollars each to install security cameras mandated by authorities in a move activists say is aimed at creating a surveillance state — and outsourcing the cost.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has struggled to strengthen its hold over the Muslim-majority region, where a large number of people do not want to be part of India.

Half a million soldiers are stationed in the occupied territory and a 2019 crackdown has seen unprecedented restrictions on protest and press freedoms.

Already there are security cameras on almost every street in Srinagar and in other towns.

Shopkeepers made to install CCTV systems inside their premises at own expense

But last month, local administrators instructed shopkeepers to install CCTV systems inside their premises — at their own expense — to enhance the police’s ability to watch people’s every move.

The orders say the scheme will “deter criminals, (and) anti-social and anti-national elements”, while outlining minimum standards for camera resolution, infrared capability and range.

Always on, the systems should record and store footage for 30 days to be produced on demand from “police and any other law enforcement agencies” without a court order. Failure to abide by the orders, which took effect last month, is punishable by a fine or a month’s imprisonment.

Surveillance system dealers in Srinagar said meeting the CCTV standards would cost every store upwards of 40,000 rupees.

“The specifications given in the order make it unaffordable for me at a time when business is down,” Bilal Ahmed, who runs an ice cream parlour in Srinagar’s main business area, said.

Bilal Ahmed said he was waiting to see whether others would abide before deciding what to do, but many are already installing the system to avoid potential punishment.

“This order is wrong. But if this is what they want, then the government should pay for it,” another Srinagar shopkeeper said while begrudgingly installing a camera system, speaking anonymously for fear of government reprisals.

Snooping techniques

India has long relied on an array of surveillance techniques to tackle Kashmiri fighters and combat dissent against its rule.

Prime Minister Modi’s government nullified the occupied region’s limited autonomy in 2019, with authorities arresting thousands and imposing the world’s longest internet shutdown to forestall a backlash. It has also imposed a rigid security framework that has rendered public protest virtually impossible.

Aakar Patel, former head of Amnesty International in India, said the CCTV order “is a worrying development”.

It will legitimise “a complete surveillance of their civic life, threatening their human rights to privacy, freedom of assembly, autonomy and dignity”, Patel said.

Already soldiers regularly confiscate Kashmiris’ cell phones to scrutinise their activities. Arrests over social media posts criticising the Indian government are common and police have a robust network of paid civilian informers.

Residents, including journalists, are regularly summoned for “background verifications”. If someone does not show up, their relatives can be held until the person reports to police.

But snooping techniques have become more sophisticated, with Indian forces installing an expansive network of cameras to monitor Kashmiri fighters.

An official document says this will include 1,100 cameras with facial recognition capabilities and centralised command centres for live police monitoring.

Repeated requests to authorities for comment on the legality of the CCTV order to shopkeepers went unanswered. “But the government describing it as related to Kashmir’s security trumps every other consideration,” one lawyer said.

Islamabad looking to Kabul to help check terror, says Bilawal

“We continue to not only monitor this situation, but work on our side to ensure that we can try to tackle the threat of terrorism and hope that the regime in Afghanistan lives up to their international commitment to not allow their soil to be used for terrorism,” the foreign minister said in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour when asked how he sees the Afghan Taliban government, after reports emerged that Kabul had brokered a ceasefire between the Pakistani military and banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan.

When asked what it will take for Pakistan to accept the current administration in Kabul, Mr Bhutto-Zardari said any decision in this regard will be taken in line with the discussions with the international community. At the same time, he added, “we continue to advocate for engagement, particularly in light of the humanitarian crisis developing in Afghanistan”.

When asked if Islamabad had engaged with the Afghan Taliban on how Muslim countries can give rights to women, the minister said it wasn’t an issue of the West. “I see women’s rights or women’s rights to education as rights granted to us in Islam. We’ll be emphasising that the Taliban keep their international commitments and ensure rights to the women of Afghanistan.”

To Ms Amanpour’s comment that the US believed Pakistan had played a “very dangerous role” in supporting the Afghan Taliban over the decades, Bilawal maintained Pakistan has consistently engaged with Afghanistan regardless of who was in power. “We have always been advocates of the fact that alongside action against terrorist activity, the resolution of the dispute was in dialogue and diplomacy and ultimately, despite Pakistan being at the receiving end of criticism for maintaining and sustaining this position, the international community went down that route while resolving the conflict and issues in Afghanistan.”

He added that the developments in Kabul have had a direct impact on the lives of the people of Pakistan. “We must prioritise, alleviate the humanitarian crisis, ensure there’s no economic collapse and hold the Taliban regime to the international commitments. It was not Pakistan, but the US who had direct communication with the Taliban regime before their takeover of Kabul. Pakistan and international community believe it will not serve any of our interests if we abandon the people of Afghanistan once again.”

Bush mistakenly calls Iraq invasion ‘brutal, unjustified’

Bush made the comments in a speech during an event in Dallas on Wednesday, while he was criticising Russia’s political system.

“The result is an absence of checks and balances in Russia, and the decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq,” Bush said, before correcting himself and shaking his head. “I mean, of Ukraine.”

He jokingly blamed the mistake on his age as the audience burst into laughter.

In 2003, when Bush was president, the United States led an invasion of Iraq over weapons of mass destruction that were never found. The prolonged conflict killed hundreds of thousands of people and displaced many more.

Bush’s remarks quickly went viral on social media, gathering over three million views on Twitter alone after the clip was tweeted by a Dallas News reporter.

The former US President also compared Ukranian leader Volodymyr Zelenskiy to Britain’s wartime leader Winston Churchill, while condemning Russian President Vladimir Putin for launching the invasion of Ukraine in February.

For the past 15 years, India and China have vied for favourable diplomatic and trade relations with Sri Lanka thanks to its strategic location in the Indian ocean.

While popular perception indicated China had outpaced India, the recent economic and political turmoil in Sri Lanka seems to have given India’s foreign policy a fresh lease of life in the island nation.

Sri Lanka is in the middle of its worst economic crisis since independence from Britain in 1948. The country has been rocked by protests as people seethe with anger over soaring prices and shortages of food and fuel.

Last week, Mahinda Rajapaksa resigned as prime minister after his supporters clashed with peaceful protesters, sparking a deadly night of violence on 9 May.

Ranil Wickremesinghe, who took over as PM, said the country’s economic problems would get worse before getting better.

He appealed for outside financial help, including from India.

 

India has never been a major lender to Sri Lanka, unlike China which by the end of 2019 owned a little over 10% of Sri Lanka’s outstanding foreign debt stock.

In early 2021, with the economic crisis looming, the Sri Lankan government had also obtained a 10bn yuan ($148m; £119m) currency swap facility from China to tackle its foreign exchange shortage.

But now, India is slowly emerging as one of the biggest providers of aid to Sri Lanka.

Colombo has racked up $51bn (£39bn) in foreign debt. This year, it will be required to pay $7bn (£5.4bn) to service these debts, with similar amounts for years to come.

The country is also seeking emergency loans of $3bn to pay for essential imports such as fuel.

While the World Bank has agreed to lend it $600m, India has committed $1.9bn and may lend an additional $1.5bn for imports.

Delhi has also sent 65,000 tonnes of fertiliser and 400,000 tonnes of fuel, with more fuel shipments expected later in May. It has committed to sending more medical supplies too.

In return, India has clinched an agreement which allows the Indian Oil Corporation access to the British-built Trincomalee oil tank farm.

India also aims to develop a 100MW power plant near Trincomalee.

Mixed feelings over Indian help

Many in Sri Lanka feel that India’s growing presence in Colombo could mean a “dilution of sovereignty”.

“For the past year and a half, there has been a crisis in Sri Lanka and we believe India has used this to serve its own interests. Yes, they gave some credit, some medicines and food but [they are] not being a friend. There is a hidden political agenda,” said Pabuda Jayagoda of the Frontline Socialist Party.

Pabuda Jayagoda of the Frontline Socialist Party sees a hidden political agenda in India’s aid for Sri Lanka

But others are more accepting of Indian help.

“Let’s not blame India for our woes,” says V Ratnasingham, an onion importer in Colombo. “We are still getting onions from India at a decent price and they are giving us credit in times of crisis. It’s the Sri Lankan government’s failure that onion prices have trebled.”

The suspicion over India’s intentions right now comes against the backdrop of Sri Lanka’s ties to China.

After Mahinda Rajapaksa took charge as president in 2005, Sri Lanka’s drift towards China was believed to be a preference for a “more reliable partner enabling domestic economic development”.

More and more infrastructure projects – including the multi-billion dollar Hambantota port and the Colombo-Galle expressway – were awarded to China.

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s maiden visit to Colombo in 2014 was also a clear diplomatic signal to Delhi.

 

Hambantota is nowadays commonly referred to as a “white elephant” which bled Sri Lanka’s economy. So are several other expensive projects which led Sri Lanka into a huge Chinese debt-cycle.

Many anti-government protesters at Colombo’s Galle Face Green are convinced that this push to modernise fast led Sri Lanka to its current situation.

The country owes China $6.5bn and talks are being held on restructuring the debt.

While China had earlier agreed to bolster Sri Lanka’s foreign currency reserves by swapping the rupee for the yuan, it has since signalled displeasure over Colombo approaching the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for help.

Noora Noor, 44, has been camping at Galle Face along with her family, demanding President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, the younger brother of Mahinda, resign.

“All Chinese money that came in was never accounted for, right? Why else would my country have defaulted on payments? Now all supplies are coming from India, so my question is who should we trust – China or India?” she asks.

Still, there are some optimists who feel diplomacy will help.

Many anti-government protesters are convinced that the push to modernise fast led Sri Lanka to its current situation

“Is Sri Lanka being placed on a collision course with China? If so, we need to avoid such an eventuality due to other negative situations that may arise. Balancing relationships is a must,” Austin Fernando, Sri Lanka’s former high commissioner to India, wrote in The Island newspaper.

India’s efforts

India has tried hard to match up to the growing Chinese clout in what it sees as its neighbourhood.

After President Xi’s visit in 2014, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi not only visited Colombo the next year but also claimed to be “the best of friends” while addressing the Sri Lankan parliament.

Arjuna Ranatunga, a former Sri Lankan cricketer who went on to become a cabinet minister, recalls India being generous when he was in office.

“I was handling both the petroleum and port ministries in 2015 and we were struggling to construct the Jaffna airport for a lack of funds. I went to Delhi seeking help. PM Modi’s government offered a subsidised loan and later converted it into a grant. What else do you want from a neighbour?”

The return of the Rajapaksas to power in 2019, this time with Gotabaya president and Mahinda prime minister, also made India realign its foreign policy options and new agreements over oil and food commodities were signed hastily.

State visits followed between Colombo and Delhi without eliciting much response from China

The question of Sri Lanka’s Tamil minorities and their demand for rights has been at the forefront of the diplomatic negotiations with India.

After the civil war ended in 2009, India extended support to the Sri Lankan government.

Sri Lanka is, however, yet to implement the 1987 India-Sri Lanka Peace Accord which promised to devolve powers to all provinces, including where the Tamils were in a majority.

The current economic crisis, however, has certainly leapfrogged over any other political concerns between the two nations.

There has been a shift in public perception in Sri Lanka – which was seen as anti-India and pro-China – thanks to consistent supplies from India of essential commodities.

“India did lose out to China about 15 years ago but is trying hard to make a decent comeback,” says Bhavani Fonseka, a senior researcher at the Centre for Policy Alternatives in Colombo.

“Ethnic minorities in Sri Lanka have always looked up to India to champion their demands for equal rights, whereas the Sinhalese majority still has a mixed perception,” she says. “Some also worry over India’s interference in internal matters. But I feel the last few weeks have changed this completely.”

Stock markets in Asia and the US have fallen over concerns that rising prices could send the global economy into a slowdown.

US shares saw their biggest one-day drop since 2020 after downbeat earnings reports from some of America’s biggest retailers.

Target said unexpectedly high fuel and freight costs had cut into profits, which halved compared with a year ago.

That followed a similarly downbeat update from rival Walmart earlier.

Japan’s benchmark Nikkei index was 1.8% lower in Asia afternoon trade, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng was down 2.3%.

That came after the S&P 500 index, which tracks shares of a wide swathe of America’s biggest companies, plunged more than 4% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 3.5%.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq fell 4.7%. The falls added to weeks of declines on US financial markets.

“What people are worried about after seeing Target is, will more earnings [estimates] have to be taken down?” said Thomas Hayes, chairman of Great Hill Capital in New York.

“Consumer sentiment is at multi-year lows and tied at the hip with inflation. So people are looking for signs of inflation moderating, and Target did not give them any today.”

 

Target’s update sent its shares plunging 25% – the biggest decline in more than three decades.

The announcements from Target and Walmart were closely watched for signs of how consumer spending is holding up in the world’s largest economy, as inflation reaches 40-year highs.

Official US government data recently showed retail sales rose a healthy 0.9% in April, but some analysts have warned the figures may be understating signs of slowdown – especially for lower-income families – since they are not adjusted for inflation.

Earlier this year, Amazon reported a surprise drop in online sales in the first three months of the year.

Target said sales at stores open for at least a year were up more than 3% in the three months to May compared to 2021. But executives said as prices rise, shoppers are spending more on essentials and cutting back on discretionary items, such as television sets and apparel.

It warned investors that costs would be $1bn higher than expected this year, driven by fuel and freight. The firm said it did not see supply chain pressures clearing until at least 2023.