Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer have faced off in the first TV debate of the general election, with heated exchanges over tax, the NHS and immigration.

The Conservative and Labour leaders got scrappy at times, forcing the host of the ITV event to intervene and urge the pair to “lower your voices”.

Mr Sunak said Labour wanted to increase tax by £2,000 – a claim Mr Starmer dismissed as “absolute garbage”.

And both leaders used the opportunity to set out their personal stories to voters, talking about how their childhood experiences had shaped their political views.

For many analysts, Mr Sunak needed a big performance after a rocky week which had seen abysmal polling for his party and the return of Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to frontline politics.

He came in bullish from the start, haranguing Mr Starmer on tax policy and frequently talking over his opponent and the chair, Julie Etchingham.

Debate topics were queued up by questions from the audience, the first coming from Paula from Huddersfield.

She was struggling with energy and food bills, she said, and had used up all her savings – a situation the charity Citizens Advice says they are dealing with 6,000 queries on every day.

Mr Sunak insisted his plan to grow the economy was starting to work and said Labour would pay for its spending plans with “£2,000 in higher taxes for every working family in our country”.

“Labour will raise your taxes – it’s in their DNA. Your work, your car, your pension – Labour will tax it,” Sunak said.

Throughout the debate he repeated the £2,000 figure.

Conservatives have come up with the number based on how much they say Labour’s spending commitments would cost, dividing this by the number of UK households with at least one person working.

While Mr Sunak suggested the costings had been worked out by impartial civil servants, they are based on assumptions made by politically appointed special advisers.

One of the most substantive policy points of the evening came with Rishi Sunak appearing to suggest he would be willing to pull the UK out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) if the Rwanda policy did not work.

Mr Sunak said he believed the UK’s plans were” compliant with our international obligations” but he added: “If I am forced to choose between securing our borders and our country’s security or a foreign court I’m going to choose our country’s security every single time.”

Pushing back on this, the Labour leader said the UK would “not pull out of international agreements and international law which is respected the world over”.

He said he wanted the UK to be a “respected player on the world stage, not a pariah”.

Mr Starmer was keen to suggest his opponent was out of touch and living in a “different world”.

Drawing a contrast between his own background and that of the prime minister was something Mr Starmer tried to do throughout, talking about the “anguish” of having the phone cut off after an unpaid bill as a child.

He suggested this was something the prime minister did not have experience with.

A clear divide between the leaders came when they were asked a “yes or no question” – if they had a loved one “on a long waiting list for surgery, would you, if you felt that that was the only way forward, use private healthcare?”

It was a “yes” from Mr Sunak and a “no” from Mr Starmer – with the Labour leader talking about the NHS being in his DNA.

At different points in the debate, both were keen to highlight the role of the UK’s health service in their own backgrounds.

Rishi Sunak’s story of growing up as the son of a GP and a pharmacist will be familiar to many – but one he would have hoped to reach a fresh audience through the debate.

Similarly, Mr Starmer spoke about his wife and mother working for the NHS.

He also spoke about his father being a tool maker and being the first person in his family to go to university.

Both Mr Sunak and Mr Starmer were asked to raise their hands if they would raise income tax, National Insurance or, with the exception of Labour’s policy on private schools, VAT.

Neither raised their hand, prompting questions about how they would pay for their policies.

The debate continued to be heated as the pair explained their parties’ policies on immigration, which has been thrown into the spotlight after the return of Nigel Farage as the leader of Reform UK.

Mr Sunak challenged Sir Keir directly on his plans on immigration, often speaking over both his opponent and the chair, Julie Etchingham.

Sir Keir responded: “We need to smash the gangs that are running this vile trade, making a huge amount of money putting some of the most vulnerable people in boats across the Channel”, to applause from the audience.

Asked about how to cut NHS waiting lists, the audience groaned loudly when Mr Sunak blamed health workers’ strikes for some of the issues – but he then won applause when he added taxes should not rise to fund the NHS.

 

There were more groans over Mr Sunak’s continued backing for his national service plan when he was asked what the Conservatives were offering the UK’s young people.

Mr Sunak said the plan – that would see every 18-year-old taking part in 25 days of community service and some being selected for a year of military service – could be “transformative”.

Mr Starmer dismissed the idea as “desperate” and said the UK did not need a a “teenage Dad’s Army” but Mr Sunak hit back with “all he can do is sneer at it because you don’t have any ideas”.

Pakistani courts to decide Imran Khan’s fate in line with law: US

WASHINGTON: Commenting on former prime minister Imran Khan’s imprisonment, US Department of State Spokesperson Matthew Miller on Monday said it was for the Pakistani courts to decide his fate.

Outlining US position on the court cases, Miller said: “It is our position that when you come to these laws in Pakistan and this court case, it is something for the Pakistani courts to decide.”

The US official said this in reply to the question posed by a reporter in context with Khan’s acquittal in cipher case and remaining imprisoned for the iddat case.

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday annulled Khan and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Vice-Chairman Shah Mahmood Qureshi’s conviction in the infamous cipher case containing charges of misusing and misplacing the classified diplomatic document.

Meanwhile, Khan remains incarcerated under the seven-year sentences handed to him and his wife Bushra Bibi by a trial court on February 3, in the “un-Islamic nikah” case at the Adiala jail. The couple was also fined Rs500,000 each.

A trial court on February 3 handed seven-year sentences, each, to the PTI founder and his wife Bushra Bibi.

Further describing the State Department’s perspective, the spokesperson said, “When we look at different countries, we take into account appropriate context, circumstances in making our judgments.”

Miller said US had numerous times addressed the question regarding Khan. “The legal proceedings against him are something for the Pakistani courts to decide (and) I’d say in accordance with their laws and constitution,” he stressed again.

Pak PWD abolition a step towards removing rot eating our system ‘like cancer’: PM

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, reiterating zero tolerance for corruption, inefficiency, and incompetence, said Tuesday that his decision to abolish the Pakistan Public Works Department (Pak PWD) was a step towards removing the rot that was eating the system like a cancer from within.

He was referring to his government’s decision to abolish the Pak PWD due to years-long poor performance and corruption, as well as the department’s failure to achieve its objectives.

“I am fully committed to building a more honest, dedicated and efficient bureaucracy that will deliver high quality public service and raise standards of governance,” the prime minister wrote on his X timeline, a day after he issued the directives in a high-level meeting on Monday.

In the meeting, the prime minister was apprised of a report compiled by a committee headed by Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Jahanzeb Khan, which recommended for abolition of certain government entities and the merger of others.

The prime minister directed the committee for finalisation of further recommendations.

The decision to abolish Pak PWD, one of the oldest government departments, created unrest amongst 7,000 employees who are uncertain about their future, The News reported.

As per the publication, the government will work out a plan to adjust them in other departments or relieve them.

Claudia Sheinbaum makes history as Mexico’s first woman president

Crowds of flag-waving supporters sang and danced to mariachi music in Mexico City’s main square celebrating the ruling party candidate’s victory.

“I want to thank millions of Mexican women and men who decided to vote for us on this historic day,” Sheinbaum said in a victory speech to the cheering crowd.

“I won’t fail you,” the 61-year-old former Mexico City mayor vowed.

She thanked her main opposition rival Xochitl Galvez, who conceded defeat.

Sheinbaum, a scientist by training, won around 58-60 percent of votes, according to preliminary official results from the National Electoral Institute.

That was more than 30 percentage points ahead of Galvez, and some 50 percentage points ahead of the only man running, long-shot centrist Jorge Alvarez Maynez.

Voters had flocked to polling stations across the Latin American nation, despite sporadic violence in areas terrorized by ultra-violent drug cartels.

Thousands of troops were deployed to protect voters, following a particularly bloody electoral process that has seen more than two dozen aspiring local politicians murdered.

‘Transformation’
Mexican women going to the polls had cheered the prospect of a woman breaking the highest political glass ceiling in a country where around 10 women or girls are murdered every day.

“A female president will be a transformation for this country, and we hope that she does more for women,” said Clemencia Hernandez, a 55-year-old cleaner in Mexico City.

“Many women are subjugated by their partners. They’re not allowed to leave home to work,” she said.

Daniela Perez, 30, said that having a woman president would be “something historic,” even though neither of the two main candidates was “totally feminist” in her view.

“We’ll have to see their positions on improving women’s rights, resolving the issue of femicides — which have gone crazy — supporting women more,” added the logistics company manager.

Nearly 100 million people were registered to vote in the world’s most populous Spanish-speaking country, home to 129 million people.

Sheinbaum owes much of her popularity to outgoing President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, a fellow leftist and mentor who has an approval rating of more than 60 percent but is only allowed to serve one term.

Lopez Obrador congratulated his ally with “all my affection and respect.” As well as being the first woman to lead Mexico, “she is also the president with possibly the most votes obtained in the history of our country,” he said.

After casting her ballot, Sheinbaum revealed she had not voted for herself but for a 93-year-old veteran leftist, Ifigenia Martinez, in recognition of her struggle.

‘Hugs not bullets’
In a nation where politics, crime and corruption are closely entangled, drug cartels went to extreme lengths to ensure that their preferred candidates win.

Hours before polls opened, a local candidate was murdered in a violent western state, authorities said, joining at least 25 other political hopefuls killed this election season, according to official figures.

In the central Mexican state of Puebla, two people died after unknown persons attacked polling stations to steal papers, a local government security source told AFP.

Voting was suspended in two municipalities in the southern state of Chiapas because of violence.

Sheinbaum has pledged to continue the outgoing president’s controversial “hugs not bullets” strategy of tackling crime at its roots.

Galvez vowed a tougher approach to cartel-related violence, declaring “hugs for criminals are over.”

More than 450,000 people have been murdered and tens of thousands have gone missing since the government deployed the army to fight drug trafficking in 2006.

The next president will also have to manage delicate relations with the neighboring United States, in particular the vexed issues of cross-border drug smuggling and migration.

As well as choosing a new president, Mexicans voted for members of Congress, several state governors and myriad local officials — a total of more than 20,000 positions.

Israel denies Netanyahu to address US Congress over Jewish holiday

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office on Tuesday denied American media reports that he will address the US Congress on June 13, amid mounting pressure to agree to a ceasefire with Hamas.

Netanyahu’s office told Israeli media the date of his speech to Congress had “not been finalised”, but it would not be on June 13 because it interferes with a Jewish holiday.

The date had been reported by Punchbowl News and Politico.

Speculation about the visit comes with Netanyahu facing intense criticism over the civilian death toll in the war in Gaza, which has ratcheted tension with President Joe Biden’s administration.

Biden on Friday presented what he labelled an Israeli three-phase plan that would end the conflict, free all hostages and lead to the reconstruction of the devastated Palestinian territory without Hamas in power.

Netanyahu’s office stressed that the war sparked by the October 7 attack would continue until all of Israel’s “goals are achieved,” including the destruction of Hamas’s military and governing capabilities.

The four party leaders in the House and Senate asked Netanyahu last week to speak before a joint meeting of Congress in a letter voicing solidarity with Israel “in your struggle against terror, especially as Hamas continues to hold American and Israeli citizens captive.”

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called in March for Israel to hold new elections in a rare example of strident criticism from a senior American official of the country’s handling of the war in Gaza.

The rebuke from Schumer, the highest-ranking elected Jewish American in history, came amid expressions of dismay from the White House over the death toll in the conflict, sparked by the October 7 attacks by Hamas militants.

Progressives including Vermont senator Bernie Sanders, an independent who votes with the Democrats, have condemned Netanyahu over his handling of the military response and vowed to snub any speech in the United States by the right-wing leader.

“It is a very sad day for our country that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been invited –- by leaders from both parties –- to address a joint meeting of the United States Congress,” Sanders said in a weekend statement.

“Israel, of course, had the right to defend itself against the horrific Hamas terrorist attack of October 7, but it did not, and does not, have the right to go to war against the entire Palestinian people,” he added, calling Netanyahu a “war criminal”.

The war broke out when Hamas militants attacked Israel, resulting in 1,194 deaths, mostly civilians, according to an AFP count based on official figures.

More than 36,470 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have been killed in the Gaza Strip since the war broke out, according to data provided by the health ministry of Hamas-run Gaza.

According to the Israeli military, 294 soldiers have been killed in the military campaign since the start of the ground offensive on October 27.

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


AFP


Most Read

  1. Seven more international, domestic flights cancelled from Karachi AirportSeven more international, domestic flights cancelled from Karachi Airport
  2. Karachi airport’s runway shut down for seven daysKarachi airport’s runway shut down for seven days
  3. Police in Lahore book seven people for installing secret cameras in girls hostelPolice in Lahore book seven people for installing secret cameras in girls hostel
  4. Feroze Khan’s second wedding festivities begin, artist shares videoFeroze Khan’s second wedding festivities begin, artist shares video
  5. Housing society owner murdered in his sleep in GujranwalaHousing society owner murdered in his sleep in Gujranwala
  6. Inside Feroze Khan’s second wedding; how Humaima welcomes new sister-in-lawInside Feroze Khan’s second wedding; how Humaima welcomes new sister-in-law

Opinion

  1. Congo coup failed, Malanga killed
    Congo coup failed, Malanga killed

    By Naveed Aman Khan

  2. Hats off to Fatah-II
    Hats off to Fatah-II

    By Naveed Aman Khan

  3. New twist in PTI founder’s strategy towards Military Establishment
    New twist in PTI founder’s strategy towards Military Establishment

    By Salim Bokhari

  4. Revoke the heat stroke
    Revoke the heat stroke

    By Dr Asif Channer

  5. Defiance, sacrifice & national resilience
    Defiance, sacrifice & national resilience

    By Naveed Aman Khan

  6. Maryam Nawaz Sharif's Police Uniform: Breaking Gender Stereotypes, Not Minds
    Maryam Nawaz Sharif’s Police Uniform: Breaking Gender Stereotypes, Not Minds

    By Alysha Khan

Modi’s alliance dominates early in India election vote count, but opposition also gains

The early see-saw trends unnerved markets with stocks falling steeply. The NIFTY 50 and the S&P BSE Sensex were both down over 2 per cent at 5am GMT. The rupee also fell against the dollar and benchmark bond yields were up.

The markets had soared on Monday after exit polls on June 1 projected Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would register a big victory, with its National Democratic Alliance (NDA) seen getting a two-thirds majority and more.

At 4:30am GMT, TV channels showed the NDA was ahead in nearly 300 of the 543 elective seats in parliament, a simple majority, in early counting. The opposition INDIA alliance led by Rahul Gandhi’s Congress party was leading in over 200 seats, higher than expected.

Only about 10pc-15pc of the total votes had been counted at the time, TV channels said.

BJP alone accounted for nearly 250 of the seats in which the NDA was leading, compared to the 303 it won in 2019. Trends also showed Modi leading first, then trailing and leading again in his seat in the Hindu holy city of Varanasi.

 

 

The first votes counted were postal ballots, which are paper ballots, mostly cast by troops serving outside their home constituencies or officials away from home on election duty. This year, postal votes were also offered to voters over 85 years of age and people with disabilities to allow them to vote from home.

Counting is expected to last several hours as the large majority of votes polled in electronic voting machines or EVMs are taken up after the first 30 minutes of counting postal ballots.

“These are very early trends, we are going to see better results as the day progresses,” Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera said.

TV exit polls broadcast after voting ended on June 1 projected a big win for Modi, but exit polls have often got election outcomes wrong in India. Nearly one billion people were registered to vote, of which 642 million turned out.

Modi said at the weekend he was confident that “the people of India have voted in record numbers” to re-elect his government, a decade after he first became prime minister.

 

Observers believe his appeals to growing Hindu nationalist sentiment will give him a third term in power.

Modi’s opponents have struggled to counter the campaign juggernaut of his BJP, and have been hamstrung by infighting and what they say are politically motivated criminal cases aimed at hobbling challengers.

US think tank Freedom House said this year that the BJP had “increasingly used government institutions to target political opponents”.

Investors have already cheered the prospects of another Modi term, expecting it to deliver further years of strong economic growth and pro-business reforms, while a possible two-thirds majority in parliament could allow major changes to the constitution, rivals and critics fear.

“The next government’s main task will be to set India on the path of getting rich before it ages,” the Times of India newspaper said in an editorial on Tuesday, referring to the young, working age population in the world’s most populous nation. “The clock’s ticking.”

On Sunday, Arvind Kejriwal, chief minister of the capital Delhi and a key leader in an alliance formed to compete against Modi, returned to jail.

Kejriwal, 55, was detained in March over a long-running corruption probe, but was later released and allowed to campaign as long as he returned to custody once voting ended.

 

 

“When power becomes dictatorship, then jail becomes a responsibility,” Kejriwal said before surrendering himself, vowing to continue “fighting” from behind bars.

In the lead-up to the election, many of the 200m-plus Muslim minority grew increasingly uneasy about their futures and their community’s place in the constitutionally secular country.

Modi himself made a number of strident comments about Muslims on the campaign trail, referring to them as “infiltrators”.

The polls were staggering in their size and logistical complexity, with voters casting their ballots in megacities New Delhi and Mumbai, as well as in sparsely populated forest areas and in the high-altitude territory of Kashmir.

 

Votes were cast on electronic voting machines, so the tally will likely be rapid, with results expected within hours.

Counting began on Tuesday morning in key centres in each state, with the data fed into computers.

“People should know about the strength of Indian democracy”, chief election commissioner Rajiv Kumar said on Monday, vowing there was a “robust counting process in place”.

India’s major TV networks will have reporters outside each counting centre, competing to flash results for each of the 543 elected seats in the lower house of parliament.

In past years, key trends have been clear by mid-afternoon with losers conceding defeat, even though full and final results may only come late on Tuesday night.

“Mandate with destiny”, the headline of the Hindustan Times read on Tuesday. Celebrations are expected at the headquarters of Modi’s BJP if the results reflect exit poll predictions.

The winning post is a simple majority of 272 seats, and the BJP won 303 at the last polls in 2019.

Heatwave voting

Election chief Kumar on Monday proclaimed the 642m votes cast a “world record”.

But based on the commission’s figure of an electorate of 968m, turnout came to 66.3 per cent, down roughly one percentage point from 67.4pc in the last polls in 2019.

 

 

Final voter data is yet to be released as repolling took place in two stations in West Bengal state on Monday.

Analysts have partly blamed the lower turnout on a searing heatwave across northern India, with temperatures in excess of 45 degrees Celsius (113 degrees Fahrenheit).

At least 33 polling staff died from heatstroke on Saturday in Uttar Pradesh state alone, where temperatures hit 46.9°C (116.4°F).

Polling should have been scheduled to end a month earlier, Kumar acknowledged. “We should not have done it in so much heat”, he said.

Scottish political leaders have gone head to head over the future of the North Sea oil and gas industry in the first debate of the general election.

Scottish political leaders have gone head to head over the future of the North Sea oil and gas industry in the first debate of the general election.

First minister and SNP leader John Swinney warned a failure to deliver a “just transition” could create an “industrial wasteland” in north east Scotland – but refused to say if he supported a presumption against new licences.

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said his party would help create 69,000 new jobs, while for the Scottish Conservatives Douglas Ross said neither the SNP nor Labour would protect the industry.

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said the Scottish and UK governments had failed to make progress on a fair transition away from fossil fuels.

The party leaders were questioned on a wide range during an STV election debate in Glasgow.

In an exchange where he criticised the Labour position on oil and gas, Mr Swinney said there had to be a managed transition to net zero, likening a failure to do so to the policies of Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s.

“What Mrs Thatcher did when she was in power was she created an industrial wasteland in central Scotland and we’re still picking up the pieces,” he said.

The first minister warned Mr Sarwar that his party would “do exactly the same to the north east of Scotland”.

Pressed on whether he would support the granting of new licences for oil and gas developments in the North Sea, Mr Swinney refused to give either a yes or no answer.

Instead he said he wanted a “climate compatibility test on every single decision we take in relation to the oil and gas sector”.

‘Broken promises’

Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross interjected, saying: “That’s a no, John Swinney and the SNP are against new oil and gas licences.”

He also accused Labour of having “dangerous plans” for the industry.

The Scottish Tory leader, who is standing down as an MP at the election, referenced a report from the Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce.

It criticised SNP and Conservative energy policies but said Labour could make the situation “even worse” by extending the Tories’ windfall tax on oil and gas profits and removing some tax breaks for investment.

Mr Sarwar said his party’s energy strategy would create 69,000 jobs in Scotland, including 53,000 roles supported by GB Energy – a publicly-owned energy generation company he said would be headquartered in Scotland.

“This is good for Aberdeen, good for the North East, good for Scotland and good for the UK,” he said.

He accused both the SNP and Tory government of “broken promises” on energy.

The Scottish Labour leader also pledged his party would “step and put our money where our mouth is” at Grangemouth, where the oil refinery is to be scheduled to be closed, by creating an energy transition hub at the site.

Mr Cole-Hamilton said the SNP and Conservative governments had been in power for “far too long”.

“These parties have been bereft of ideas, they’ve not driven down reliance on fossil fuels and they’ve not taken the steps to bring about that just transition,” he said.

The Scottish government’s draft energy strategy includes a presumption against new drilling. The publication of the already delayed final document has been pushed back due to the general election.

During the debate, Mr Swinney predicted Labour was “going to walk it in England” in the general election, adding that the Tories were “finished”.

However he said Sir Keir Starmer and Labour would maintain the same “fiscal stranglehold” on the public purse, claiming that would be “disastrous for public services”.

Mr Sarwar said removing the Conservatives from Downing Street was an “opportunity Scotland cannot afford to miss”.

He added: “This election is about getting rid of this Tory government and it can only be replaced by a Labour government with Scottish Labour MPs at its heart delivering for the Scottish people.”

Douglas Ross says the UK government is improving the economy

Under questioning, Mr Ross said he was wrong to support Liz Truss’s ill-fated mini-budget – a package including £45bn of unfunded tax cuts.

During an exchange with Mr Swinney, he said he had “assumed” the proposals had “gone through the normal processes with the Treasury” to ensure they were “deliverable”.

“That hadn’t been done,” the Scottish Tory leader said. “And I hold my hands up, I assumed that had been done.”

He said it “had an impact on household incomes” but that the UK government was “taking decisions to improve the economy”.

BBC Scotland will host an election debate on 11 June. The Debate Night special will feature the same four parties as the STV debate, as well as the Scottish Greens.

The first debate is over, and my inbox is already full of emails from the parties assuring me their leader won.

I’m not convinced there was any clear winner or loser – and it didn’t feel like this was an event that fundamentally shifted the electoral dial.

Winners aside, there were entertaining exchanges. Perhaps more heat than light at points.

It was a debate covered a lot of ground. From fishermen, to partygate, to austerity, to oil and gas.

Many of the key exchanges involved John Swinney and Anas Sarwar. A reminder that the key fight in Scotland at this election will be between the SNP and Labour.

Both of those leaders stand to benefit greatly from any misstep the other makes. And that Labour/SNP rivalry will continue into all the debates yet to come.

Sri Lanka rain floods kill 14, schools shut

Some drowned, including three members of the same family swept away near the capital Colombo on Sunday. Others were buried alive in mudslides, including an 11-year-old girl and a 20-year-old man, the Disaster Management Centre (DMC) said.

Nine other people were crushed and killed when trees fell on them in seven districts since the monsoon intensified on May 21, the DMC said.

While Sri Lanka depends on the seasonal monsoon rain for irrigation as well as hydroelectricity, experts have warned that it faces more frequent floods as the world heats due to climate change.

The DMC said 20 out of the country’s 25 districts were affected by heavy rain and issued warnings to people living on the banks of main rivers to move to higher ground. Flights arriving at Colo­mbo’s main international airport were diverted to a smaller airport, and some key highways were flooded at several exits.

The government also ordered all schools to remain shut on Monday after the weekend holiday, as more rain was forecast. “There could be more heavy rains accompanied by strong winds and thunder,” the DMC said.

Last week, wildlife authorities found seven carcasses of young elephants who drowned in the biggest single loss of the animals in five years. The onset of the southwest monsoon triggered flooding in the elephant habitat in Dimbulagala, around 250 kilometres northeast of Colombo.

Ahmadinejad registers bid to return as Iran president

The Islamic republic goes to the polls on June 28 to replace former president Ebrahim Raisi, who died in a helicopter crash on May 19.

“I am confident that all the country’s problems can be solved by making maximum use of national capacities,” he said after submitting his bid at the interior ministry.

However, he could be barred from the race: the country’s cleric-led Guardian Council — a body of 12 jurists — will vet candidates and publish the list of qualified ones on June 11.

Candidates’ registration process ends today; final list to be published on 11th

Candidate registration opened on Thursday and closes on Monday.

Other prominent figures, including moderate ex-parliament speaker Ali Larijani and ultraconservative former nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, have also registered their bids.

Ahmadinejad, 67, a former member of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards, was first elected as Iran’s president in 2005 and stepped down because of term limits in 2013.

His two straight terms were marked by a standoff with the West, especially over Iran’s nuclear programme and his incendiary remarks on Israel.

He was barred from standing in the 2017 election by the Guardian Council, a year after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned him that entering was “not in his interest and that of the country”.

A rift developed between the two after Ahmadinejad explicitly advocated checks on Khamenei’s ultimate authority. In 2018, in a rare criticism directed at Khamenei, Ahmadinejad wrote to him calling for “free” elections.

Khamenei had backed Ahmadinejad after his 2009 re-election triggered protests in which dozens of people were killed and hundreds arrested, rattling the ruling theocracy before security forces stamped out the unrest.

Imran Khan, Shah Mahmood Qureshi acquitted in two vandalism cases

ISLAMABAD: A district and sessions court in the federal capital Monday acquitted Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and party’s leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi in two cases pertaining to the long march vandalism.

Judicial Magistrate Ehtesham Alam approved the acquittal against the petitions filed by Khan and Qureshi.

Meanwhile, PTI politicians Ali Mohammad Khan, Murad Saeed were acquitted in both the cases, while former leader Asad Umar also got relief.

Both Umar and Ali appeared before the court and marked their attendance. The cases against them were filed in the Golra Police Station.

The development comes two weeks after the PTI founder and other leaders of his party were acquitted in similar cases registered in the Kohsar and Karachi Company police stations for violation of Section 144.

Other leaders of the party who were acquitted on May 20 included Zartaj Gul, Ali Nawaz Awan, Faisal Javed, Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Qasim Suri, Raja Khurram Nawaz, Shireen Mazari, Saifullah Niazi, Asad Umar and Awami Muslim League chief Sheikh Rashid Ahmad.

On May 30, a district and sessions court of Islamabad had also acquitted Khan in two cases related to the May 9 riots.

“Because of insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution, the PTI founder has been acquitted,” the district and sessions court said in its verdict.

The cases were registered against the PTI founder for long march and violation of Article 144.

Khan remains behind bars in Adiala jail since August 2023, while several current and former politicians of his party are facing various allegations in the cases related to the violence following his arrest on May 9.

Islamabad High Court (IHC), on May 16, had also approved PTI founder’s bail petition in the £190 million National Crime Agency (NCA) settlement reference, but he has been arrested in other cases as well.