Announcing election date beyond caretaker govt’s mandate: PM Kakar

Amid uncertainty surrounding the election schedule, interim Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar on Friday reiterated that announcing the poll date was beyond the constitutional mandate of the caretaker set-up.

Addressing a press conference in Islamabad, he said: “Announcing the election date is not the prerogative of a caretaker set-up. It will be illegal if we announce a date for the polls. We will not support any unconstitutional measure.”

Responding to a question, the premier warned of a consistent crackdown against illegal trade and said an effective management plan is being implemented to control cross-border smuggling.

“We have zero tolerance for those involved in the ‘smuggling industry’ and the law will take its course,” he added. Kakar further said detailed deliberations were held on the Afghan transit trade and the reopening of the Torkham border, APP reported.

The commerce ministry has taken a lead along with border management authorities including customs in revising the policy to allow or restrict the trade items, he said.

‘Will push aliens back to their country’

Asked about the involvement of Afghan refugees involved in cross-border smuggling, PM Kakar said an effective policy in this regard had been agreed upon.

He categorised the Afghans living in Pakistan into three classes — those registered with the government, “aliens” with no justification to reside, and those with identity theft.

“We will push the aliens [illegal Afghan immigrants] back to their country and no one without the visa regime will be allowed to live here,” he said.

The interim PM regretted that the previous lenient approach in this regard resulted in various social evils. He also pointed out the risk of smuggling leading to the strengthening of terrorist outfits and non-state actors.

Terror threats

“Non-state actors take their space under dysfunctional setup and we are determined to target them,” he said, terming counter-terrorism a priority for the caretaker government.

He mentioned that the apex committee was working with a focused approach on the tactical and strategic angles of the newly emerging terror threats. The prime minister said the priority of the caretaker government is to provide the inflation-hit people relief through administrative measures.

“We want to assure the people of the country that the caretaker government, whether it stays in office either for one or one-and-a-half months, will prove effective in its governance.”

Petrol prices

Responding to a question about the hike in petroleum prices thrice during the tenure of the caretaker government, the PM said the matter was beyond domestic control and was linked to the global increase.

The government, he added, is focusing on providing relief by improving the approach of governance.

Easy instalments for electricity consumers

To a query, the premier hinted at announcing in the near future the easy instalments for electricity consumers with up to 200 units of electricity usage.

To another question about the nexus of politicians and public officials involved in misappropriation, he said: “We have to break this cycle on priority to get effective results followed by stern action against the responsible ones.”

“We will take action on adopting a due process without fear and favour, and will take them to the court of law,” he said.

Kakar said the government believed in the freedom of media and rejected the notion of stifling it. “A normal media ecosystem is in place and there is no bar on the outlets, even on airing criticism on the caretaker government.”

2,000 cases likely to be reopened following SC verdict in NAB amendments case

ISLAMABAD: Following the Supreme Court’s verdict in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) law amendments case, around 2,000 graft cases — including those at the reference, complaint verification, inquiry, and investigation level — are expected to be restored, The News reported Saturday.

A three-member bench of the apex court headed by outgoing Chief Justice Umar Bandia, with a 2-1 majority, struck down some of the amendments made to the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO) 1999 by the previous coalition government, declaring it against the rights pertaining to public interest enshrined in the Constitution.

Former prime minister Imran Khan had challenged the changes made to the accountability laws.

After the apex court ruling, a number of cases are expected to be restored, including those against former president Asif Ali Zardari, six former prime ministers — Nawaz Sharif, Shaukat Aziz, Yousuf Raza Gillani, Raja Pervez Ashraf, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Shehbaz Sharif — and former finance minister Ishaq Dar.

Against Zardari, Nawaz and Gillani, the Toshakhana references will be reopened. Whereas, the LNG references were restored against Abbasi and the rental power reference against Ashraf. All these references had been transferred from the accountability court.

Of the 2000 cases restored, 755 cases were returned at the inquiry stage and 292 at the investigation stage, according to sources, which added that around 510 cases were of less than Rs500 million and 168 cases pertained to assets beyond known source of income.

Similarly, 213 cases stand restored as per Section 9A, while 89 cases are related to fraud.

The NAB is still awaiting the detailed judgment and its prosecution branch is busy compiling the data which would be submitted to the chairman after compilation.

The sources added the legal issue was that the NAB prosecution branch was headless following the resignation of Justice (retd) Syed Asghar Haider as prosecutor general accountability and so far his successor has not been named.

Furthermore, according to the sources, NAB Balochistan had already recommended to the NAB headquarters for the closing of an inquiry against Caretaker Prime Minister Anwaar ul Haq Kakar due to a lack of evidence a few months back.

It had sought formal approval for closing of the inquiry from the NAB headquarters, sources added.

G77+China summit seeks ‘new economic world order’

United Nations chief Antonio Guterres, who arrived on the island on Thursday, will join some 30 heads of state and government from Africa, Asia and Latin America at the two-day summit in Havana.

The meeting should conclude on Saturday with a statement underscoring “the right to development in an increasingly exclusive, unfair, unjust and plundering international order,” the foreign minister of host Cuba, Bruno Rodriguez, told reporters on Wednesday.

A draft of the closing statement underlines the many obstacles facing developing nations, and includes “a call for the establishment of a new economic world order,” he said.

The bloc was established by 77 countries of the global South in 1964 “to articulate and promote their collective economic interests and enhance their joint negotiating capacity,” according to the group’s website.

Today it has 134 members, among which the website lists China although the Asian giant says it is not a full member. Cuba took over the rotating presidency in January.

Guterres, who will deliver the opening address with Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel, has recently attended a rash of multilateral summits, including a gathering of the G20 club of major economies in India and the BRICS group that includes Russia.

The prosecutor leading the federal election meddling case against Donald Trump has asked a judge to place him under a gag order, limiting how he is able to publicly comment on the case.

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s filing says the “narrowly tailored” order would prevent harassment of witnesses.

Mr Trump hit back online, accusing Smith’s team of misconduct, writing: “they won’t allow me to SPEAK?”

He has pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.

The request was unsealed by District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan and was filed a week earlier. It was among a slew of older court documents from the case that were released on Friday.

Prosecutors say their proposed order – which they never refer to as a “gag order” – is “a narrow, well defined restriction” that is necessary to prevent disinformation, threats and “prejudicing” the case.

If approved, it would ban Mr Trump from making statements “regarding the identity, testimony, or credibility of prospective witnesses” and “statements about any party, witness, attorney, court personnel, or potential jurors that are disparaging and inflammatory, or intimidating”.

It does not place any restrictions on Mr Trump from quoting from public record court documents or proclaiming his innocence.

Any restriction placed on the former president’s first amendment right to freedom of speech, particularly as he runs for president in 2024, would kick off a major constitutional challenge in court.

Last week, lawyers for Mr Trump wrote to Judge Chutkan, calling her biased against Mr Trump and asking her to step aside from the case.

It is unclear when she may issue a ruling on either motion.

On Truth Social, Mr Trump’s social media platform, he wrote on Friday: “So, I’m campaigning for President against an incompetent person who has WEAPONIZED the DOJ & FBI to go after his Political Opponent, & I am not allowed to COMMENT?

“They Leak, Lie, & Sue, & they won’t allow me to SPEAK?”

Shortly afterwards, speaking at a dinner for the group Concerned Women for America in Washington DC , he said prosecutors wanted to take away his right to speak freely and openly.

“These people are sick and they want to silence me because I will never let them silence you.

“But in the end they’re not after me, they’re after you, and I just happen to be standing in their way,” Mr Trump told the group of around 300 socially conservative evangelical Christian women.

CWA president Penny Nance led the group in prayer with former President Trump after his speech

The filing refers to specific statements and online posts by Mr Trump as well as people, including Judge Chutkan, who have allegedly faced intimidation after Mr Trump criticised them.

In one comment referenced by prosecutors, Mr Trump called her “a fraud dressed up as a judge” and “a radical Obama hack”. They argue that a woman who was arrested for calling the judge and making racist death threat came as a result of Mr Trump’s criticisms.

The filing also cites attacks by Mr Trump on a Georgia election worker and his former cybersecurity aide which have allegedly resulted in harassment by his supporters

 

On Friday it was also revealed that Twitter had secretly delivered direct messages from Mr Trump’s account to Mr Smith’s team.

Twitter had fought the ruling, but was ultimately forced to hand over 32 direct messages. No information about the messages was released, including whether they were sent or received by Mr Trump, or were undelivered drafts.

Mr Trump, the current frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, faces mounting legal troubles.

He has been criminally indicted four times, including in this federal investigation into efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election.

An official in eastern Libya has denied allegations that many of those killed in devastating floods last weekend were told to stay in their homes.

Othman Abdul Jalil, a spokesperson for the Benghazi-based government, told the BBC that soldiers warned people in the city of Derna to flee.

He denied that people were told not to evacuate, but conceded some may have felt the threat was exaggerated.

Meanwhile, BBC teams in Derna say aid agencies are yet to arrive at the city.

While reporters witnessed a hive of activity in the centre of Derna – with rescuers, ambulance crews and forensic teams working to identify the dead – there was little sign of major international aid agencies.

A spokesperson for one organisation said that trying to coordinate aid operations in the country was “a nightmare”.

“Libya one week ago was already complicated,” said Tomasso Della Longa from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC).

Making the situation even more complicated is the fact that the floods have destroyed crucial infrastructure, like roads and telecommunications systems.

 

Death tolls that have been provided vary from around 6,000 up to 11,000. With many more thousands still missing, Derna’s mayor has warned that the total could reach 20,000.

The BBC has been told that some victims’ bodies have washed ashore more than 100km (60 miles) from Derna, after they were swept out to sea.

A spokesperson for the United Nations’ humanitarian office, Jens Laerke, told the BBC that there were still survivors and dead bodies under the rubble, and that it would be some time before they knew the true number of casualties.

“We are trying to not to have a second disaster there. It is critical to prevent a health crisis, to provide shelter, clean water and food,” he said.

More than 1,000 people have so far been buried in mass graves, according to a UN report.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has asked disaster workers to stop doing this, because a hasty burial in mass graves can lead to long-lasting mental distress for grieving family members.

Thousands of people were killed when two dams burst in the wake of Storm Daniel on Sunday, washing whole neighbourhoods into the Mediterranean Sea.

Survivors have described terrifying escapes and people being swept away in front of their eyes.

Entire neighbourhoods were washed into the Mediterranean Sea

The country’s fragmented political situation is said to be complicating the recovery. Libya is split between two rival governments – with the UN-backed administration based in the capital Tripoli and the rival Egyptian-supported one based in Benghazi.

Questions raised over evacuation orders

There have been widespread allegations that the two dams that collapsed were not well-maintained, and there are growing calls for an urgent inquiry into how the flooding became so catastrophic.

There are also conflicting reports as to whether – and when – people were told to flee their homes. Residents have told the BBC that they received mixed messages from the two rival governments on whether they should stay or leave.

Guma El-Gamaty, a Libyan academic and head of the Taghyeer Party, said on Thursday that people in the flood zone should have been evacuated, but “on the contrary they were told to stay put and stay inside their houses and not go out”.

But Derna’s mayor told Arab news channel Al-Hadath that he “personally ordered evacuating the city three or four days before the disaster.” The BBC has not been able to verify Abdulmenam al-Ghaithi’s claims.

As the weather got worse, police and military were telling people to leave their homes for higher ground, survivors have told the BBC.

But it seemed many people did not take the threat seriously.

“A lot of them did but unfortunately, people sometimes, they said, ‘well you know, this is exaggerating, this might not be the case’,” an official from Libya’s unofficial, eastern administration told the BBC’s Newshour programme.

There are also allegations that officials took to Libyan television on Sunday night, and ordered people to stay in their homes because of the bad weather. But the same official, Othman Abdul Jalil, denied this.

It is too early to attribute with certainty the severity of this storm to rising global temperatures. However, climate change is thought to be increasing the frequency of the world’s strongest storms.

Prof Liz Stephens, an expert in climate risks and resilience at the UK’s University of Reading, said scientists were confident that climate change was super-charging the rainfall associated with such storms.

On Friday, a top UN official, Martin Griffiths, said the disaster was “a massive reminder” of climate change and the challenge it posed.

Schools across Scotland face weeks of closures and disruption after a third union rejected a new pay offer.

Unite has joined Unison and the GMB in turning down the proposal from council body Cosla. All three have warned time is running out to avert strike action.

Parent groups have raised fears school closures will have a “detrimental” effect on their children.

But on Thursday Cosla said there was no more money available for pay without cuts to jobs and services.

The latest offer from the body, which represents Scotland’s 32 councils, is a two-part plan which it said would give workers at least a £1,929 increase in annual salary by 1 January 2024.

The decision to reject this means three out of four schools could be closed by a programme of strikes beginning with a three-day walkout on 26, 27 and 28 September.

On Friday Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: “It has taken Cosla five months to increase their offer by a measly 38 pence a week for the lowest paid council workers.

“Unite’s local government representatives rightly rejected this offer. The fight for better jobs, pay and conditions in local government goes on, and if needs be by strike action. Unite will back its members all the way.”

‘Meaningful discussions’

Unison has already said Cosla has until 20 September to “significantly improve” the offer and prevent walkouts.

GMB Scotland dismissed the latest offer as “far too little, far too late” to avoid the upcoming strikes.

First Minister Humza Yousaf said he had already provided Cosla with additional funding to help negotiation in the pay offer and hoped that this would be enough.

Calling on both sides to continue “meaningful discussions”, he said: “We’ll continue to do what we can to support those discussions but they are negotiations for Cosla and nobody… wants to see strike action and our schools closed.”

Scottish Labour Leader Anas Sarwar said the Scottish government needed to show leadership and get round the table with Cosla and the trade unions and strike a deal that is “fair for workers and fair for those that require council services.”

The three unions had to ballot each council area separately and this has led to a complex picture of who has the right to strike across the country.

‘Frustrated’ parents

Only six out of the 32 councils will be unaffected. These are the areas where the unions did not win a mandate.

They are Argyll and Bute, East Ayrshire, East Lothian, Midlothian, Scottish Borders and West Lothian.

No council has said what effects these strike days will have but the unions expect the actions to lead to widespread school closures.

Parents outside a school in Paisley spoke about the effects the industrial action could have on their childcare.

Paul Lumsden says he hopes the dispute is resolved as quickly as possible

Paul Lumsden said: “It’s obviously disruptive to the kids. I hope the staff get looked after and the outcome is resolved as quickly as possible.

“It means we have to get more childcare arranged. We’ve got childcare arrangements in place but it’s not that convenient having to chop and change to ask parents and grandparents.”

Zornista Koleva said: “It will bring some difficulty for parents like me. I think if they need to fight for better conditions they need to go for it. I definitely need to change my working days.

“I have three kids so I will need to take some time off probably. I feel a bit frustrated as it feels last minute.”

Zornista Koleva says she will need to take time off on strike days

Speaking on BBC Radio’s Good Morning Scotland programme, Leanne McGuire, of the Glasgow City Parents Group, said the latest strikes felt like “history repeating itself”.

It is the fourth year of disruption following the Covid lockdowns and teacher strikes.

She told the programme: “My concern is that we start to feel that this is the new normal in schools and it really shouldn’t be.

“Pupils should be able to get through their full school year without any disruption, regardless of what that disruption is for.”

Ms McGuire said there was a lot of sympathy for the striking workers and anger at Cosla, the councils and the Scottish government that the dispute had not been settled.

She added: “When these talks come down to the wire, that’s where families get really frustrated because we don’t know what plans to put in place.

“That’s where people start getting really frustrated about it.”

Robert Woolley, of the Highland Parent Council Partnerships, said he was worried school closures were having a detrimental effect on pupils who were forced to learn alone at home.

“I think it’s detrimental to the social aspect of life being stuck behind a screen. It’s not normal. You worry about the future of your children,” he said.