In Modi’s India, cow vigilantism takes priority over human lives

India’s sacred cows have taken precedence over human lives under the tenure of Narendra Mod

International organizations are sounding alarms as reports emerge detailing a string of horrifying incidents involving the martyrdom of hundreds of Muslims in the name of “Gau Raksha,” or cow protection.

According to data compiled by Reuters, a staggering 850 Muslims have lost their lives at the hands of Hindu extremists who claim to be protecting cows. The rise in these incidents has been exponential since Modi took office in 2014.

Between 2014 and 2018, there were 63 attacks by self-proclaimed “Gau Rakshaks,” resulting in the deaths of 44 Muslims and injuries to 124 others. However, these numbers have seen a horrifying escalation, with over 200 attacks recorded by August 2022 and the death toll reaching a shocking 850.

Disturbingly, this wave of violence shows no signs of abating.

The Indian Express reports the presence of around 200 Go Rakshak Brigades solely in Delhi, while an earlier 2016 investigation by The Guardian suggested that there are more than 5,000 such groups across the nation.

These groups, often aligned with or supported by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), have taken it upon themselves to be self-appointed defenders of the cow.

What’s more unsettling is the complicity of media silence on these grave matters.

Between 2015 and 2018, there were a staggering 71 attacks by cow vigilantes. However, the Modi-controlled media reported only a mere four of these incidents.

One particularly heinous incident that sent shockwaves through the nation and the world occurred earlier this year in Rajasthan’s Bharatpur district. In February, two Muslims were mercilessly burnt alive by extremists, casting an alarming light on the extent of the brutality committed in the name of cow protection.

With mounting evidence pointing towards BJP support or alliance with such groups, questions arise about the nation’s leadership and their commitment to preserving India’s secular fabric.

In a symbolic gesture of state-endorsed extremism, the government of Haryana in 2021 officially entrusted the task of protecting the revered “Cow Mata” to the Cow Rakshak Brigade of the controversial Mono Maser Bajrang Dal.

Who is a Gau Rakshak?

The first organized Hindu cow protection movement in India started with a Sikh group in Punjab around 1870.

In 1882, a Hindu religious leader named Dayanand Saraswati founded the first cow protection committee, as reported by the BBC in 2015.

The Bhartiya Gau Raksha Dal (BGRD), an organization focused on protecting cows, has around 6,000 full-time members, mostly men and mostly from the Brahmin community.

They work all over India, especially in states like Haryana, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Gujarat.

Sometimes, these cow protectors use violence, which has made the news since the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government came to power in May 2014.

On July 11th, in Gujarat’s Una town, cow protectors tied up and beat four Dalit men with iron rods because they were skinning a dead cow.

This kind of vigilantism turned deadly in September 2015 when a mob killed a 55-year-old Muslim man and seriously injured his son, accusing them of slaughtering a cow.

Since then, these cow protectors have been making frequent headlines.

Just in March, there were at least eight cases of violence reported to the police in Gurgaon, where vigilante groups were involved. In June, a video came out showing members of a group called the Gau Rakshak Dal in Gurgaon forcing two men to eat a mixture made from cow dung, urine, milk, curd, and ghee because they were suspected of transporting beef.

The BGRD was established in 2012 and claims to have saved the lives of 11,000 cows in Delhi, Maharashtra, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh. It’s even registered as a company by the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs. One of the things they want to do, as mentioned on their website, is to create a research center and a practicing center for treating critical ailments using cow urine.

In Gujarat alone, about 200 cow vigilante groups have emerged, as reported by The Hindu on July 22.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and his Scottish counterpart Anas Sarwar have denied they are divided ahead of a key by-election.

Sir Keir told a party event in South Lanarkshire that the pair had “real clarity about shared objectives”.

Mr Sarwar also played down differences over issues such as the two-child benefit cap.

Meanwhile, the SNP described Labour’s Rutherglen and Hamilton West campaign as an “unfolding disaster.”

 

Earlier this month Margaret Ferrier, who was was suspended for breaking Covid lockdown rules, lost her seat after a petition by constituents.

A date has yet to be set for the by-election but the earliest it could happen would be 5 October.

On Tuesday the Labour leaders held an “in conversation event” with supporters in Rutherglen.

After some questions from activists the leaders were asked by BBC Scotland News if their differences over the two-child benefit cap amounted to an “open goal” for political opponents.

Scottish Labour has said it opposes the cap – which blocks applicants from claiming Universal Credit or Child Tax Credit for a third child – despite UK leader Sir Keir insisting he would not scrap it.

The two child benefit cap is a reserved matter but Scottish Labour has said it remains opposed to it

In response, Mr Sarwar said: “There is no division. There is no divide.

“There is of course a change in emphasis, you could argue, but it goes back to the point I made earlier on.

“Devolution is not about disagreement, division, fighting or two governments battling with each other to try and pull communities apart.”

Mr Sarwar said that he accepted the party could not go into elections with unfunded commitments but that Scottish Labour MPs would “expect” UK Labour to fight poverty.

He added: “My view has not changed that Labour was right to oppose the two child limit, it was right to campaign against it.

“But I’m also honest about accepting that we cannot go into an election making unfunded spending commitments.

“It would be wrong to say to people that we’re going to make promises that we can’t keep.”

Anas Sarwar said there might be a change of emphasis but denied they were divided on key issues.

Sir Keir said the session demonstrated the “shared objectives” of the UK and Scottish leaders “about where we want to get to and the change we want to bring about”.

“There is no difference between us on that,” he added.

“And when it comes to anti-poverty strategies I genuinely believe we have to be more ambitious than simply saying it is about a particular welfare payment.”

Last month Sir Keir said he would not commit extra money to benefits without first growing the economy.

But ahead of his campaign visit, he promised Labour would “smash the glass ceiling” that holds working people back.

“It means striking a new deal that will strengthen workers’ rights and finally make work pay. No more zero hour contracts, no more fire and rehire, and a real living wage for everyone,” he said

“Singing from the same hymn sheet.”

“Exact same wavelength.”

“Welded together.”

Just in case you didn’t pick up on the message, these were a few of the phrases deployed by the Starmer/Sarwar double act this morning when stressing that there’s no division between them.

Broadly speaking, this is true. These are two leaders who are obviously comfortable with each other’s politics.

But in a few policy areas they take different positions. And we’re in the white heat of a by-election where differences are put under the microscope.

The two child benefit cap is one such policy. It’s not a devolved issue, but Scottish Labour oppose it.

Sir Keir Starmer won’t pledge to scrap it if he’s prime minister.

Today it appeared that the two leaders found a form of words acceptable to both.

Anas Sarwar accepts that the UK Labour Party can’t make unfunded pledges. And Sir Keir is promising that any government he leads will prioritise tackling poverty.

The UK Labour leader also says that he’s open to making any policy work more fairly.

So, although fundamental position of both leaders hasn’t changed, the pair seem to now have a response that works for them both and stresses unity.

But don’t expect the SNP to accept this explanation as we head towards an important by-election.

Presentational grey line

At the Rutherglen event, the UK Labour leader said the SNP, which won the seat back from Labour in 2019, had “imploded and run out of road”.

Sir Keir also told the audience the constituency had UK-wide significance ahead of the general election and was a “stepping stone to the battle than we will have next year”.

And he vowed his government would be “ambitious” not just when it comes to “a welfare payment or two” but would aim grow the economy across the UK. He insisted this would help to lift people out of poverty.

Sir Keir, a former director of public prosecutions, and ex-dentist Mr Sarwar also shared personal stories about how they had been shaped by their backgrounds and their experiences working in the public sector.

SNP depute leader Keith Brown has defended the party’s record on transparency

Earlier, SNP deputy leader Keith Brown described Labour’s campaign as an “unfolding disaster.”

He told BBC Radio’s Good Morning Scotland programme: “What they are offering is the same as the Tories. It’s austerity. It’s Brexit. It’s the biggest fall in living standards in a generation.”

Mr Brown said the scrapping the two-child cap would affect nearly 1,500 people in the constituency.

Asked about divisions in his own party, he said he would support the Bute House Agreement with the Scottish Greens being debated at its forthcoming conference if such a motion was brought forward – though he still backs the deal.

On Monday the SNP’s former Westminster leader Ian Blackford said the party’s pact with the Greens would remain in place until 2026.

Mr Brown told the programme: “There is no question the SNP has challenges now on a number of issues.

“I understand that point and that is probably no different from any other party at any given time.

“But what we are is united in the fact that we believe the future in Scotland is not one portrayed by the Labour and Conservative parties, which is the ever increasing pressure on working families.”

In alphabetical order, the candidates confirmed for the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by election are data analyst Gloria Adebo (Scottish Liberal Democrats); Glasgow Shettleston councillor Thomas Kerr (Scottish Conservatives); Cambuslang councillor Katy Loudon (SNP); trade union official Chris Sermanni (Scottish Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition) and teacher and activist Michael Shanks (Scottish Labour).

US ‘ready’ to work with Pakistan’s interim setup on ‘free and fair’ polls

WASHINGTON: The United States said Tuesday it is looking forward to working with the Anwaar-ul-Haq-led interim government, which will see the country through to an election due in months.

“We look forward to working with the interim prime minister and his team as they prepare to hold elections,” State Department Principal Deputy Spokesperson Vedant Patel said during a press briefing.

The deputy spokesperson acknowledged that the United States was aware of the allied government’s dissolution and the appointment of Kakar as the caretaker prime minister.

“We, of course, will continue to partner with Pakistan on areas of mutual interest, including our interest on Pakistan’s economic stability, prosperity, and security, and the conduct of free and fair elections and the respect for democracy and the rule of law.”

Politicians from both sides — the former government and opposition — had welcomed the appointment and hoped that the interim PM would ensure free and fair polls in the country.

Kakar’s first task — as he takes charge of a country that has been wracked by political and economic instability for months — is to choose a cabinet to run the country as it heads into an election period that could last for months.

Parliament was officially dissolved last week, with elections due within 90 days according to the constitution.

But data from the latest census was finally published earlier this month, and the outgoing government said the election commission needed time to redraw constituency boundaries.

There has been speculation for months that the vote would be delayed as the authorities struggle to stabilise a country facing overlapping security, economic and political crises.

Terrorism and Afghanistan

Responding to a question, the spokesperson underscored that the US was in regular conversation with Pakistani leadership to discuss Afghanistan in detail including through the two countries’ counterterrorism dialogue and other bilateral consultations.

“We have a shared interest with Pakistan, quite candidly, in combating threats to regional stability and remain ready to work with Pakistan to combat militant and terrorist groups.”

The spokesperson said the US also supports the government’s own efforts to combat terrorism and ensure the safety and security of its citizens in a manner that promotes the rule of law.

His response was to a statement by Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States Masood Khan, who stated that weapons worth $7 billion left behind by the American forces were now being used against Pakistan.

The ambassador said terrorist groups based in Afghanistan were not only problematic for Pakistan but the issue was also equally concerning for the US.

“Today Pakistan is coming under attack and tomorrow its neighbours could meet the same fate. Proscribed organisations, including Daesh and Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, have got hold of the latest weapons,” said the Pakistani ambassador.

He said talks had been continuing with the US for getting the latest weapons for combating terrorists equipped with modern arms.

“The US has agreed to give the latest weapons and communication gadgets to Pakistan. We have informed America that there is a need to enhance the capacity of Pakistani forces in their fight against the terrorists.”

In a first during peacetime, no Independence Day greetings exchanged between Pakistan, India

The relationship between Pakistan and India further deteriorated as the nuclear-armed neighbours did not keep up with the tradition of exchanging formal greetings on their respective independence days for the first time during peacetime,

Pakistan celebrated its 77th Independence Day on August 14 whereas India observed its a day later.

August 14 also marked the last day of Shehbaz Sharif as prime minister. The outgoing government did not receive a message of felicitation from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

On the same day, Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar took oath as the eighth caretaker prime minister of Pakistan. He reciprocated the gesture and opted not to send India salutations on its independence day.

Another diplomatic courtesy was also given a miss by the Indian prime minister — that of greeting a head of government who assumes office.

Today is Interim PM Kakar’s third day in government and there has been no message from New Delhi as of yet.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) did not offer any comment regarding these new ‘trends’ in the diplomatic relations between the two countries, which had been worsened by the incumbent Indian leadership.

The Foreign Office has, however, confirmed that no greetings were exchanged by Pakistan and India on the occasion of their Independence Days.

Relations between the two countries had been sour mainly due to the constant belligerent attitude of India’s leadership but had deteriorated even more ever since the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Modi came to power nine years ago.

Modi subverted Saarc by scuttling its summit that was to be held in Pakistan in November 2016; India also continued to promote terror activities on Pakistan soil. Indian spy-cum-terrorist Kalbhuhshan Jadhav is glaring evidence of India’s interventionist role in Pakistan; Jadhav was caught red-handed in Pakistan as an Indian spy.

In August 2019, New Delhi annexed Occupied Kashmir and merged it into the Indian Union, doing away with the special status of Jammu and Kashmir which is an internationally recognised disputed territory between Pakistan and India.

The dispute is still pending on the agenda of the United Nations Security Council. In February 2019, India initiated blatant aggression against Pakistani territory but the armed forces of Pakistan shot down the intruding Indian warplanes and captured one of the Indian pilots Abhinadan Varthaman.

Pakistan reduced diplomatic relations with India in the wake of the events of 2019, and since then the two countries have charge d’affaires looking after their respective missions after the expulsion of each other’s envoys in Islamabad and New Delhi. The number of diplomatic staff has also been reduced by the two countries.

Pakistan recently designated Aizaz Khan as its charge d’affaires in its New Delhi high commission after Salman Sharif’s return to Islamabad. India is also reportedly changing its charge d’affaires as Apoorva Srivastava could replace Suresh Kumar who was posted in Islamabad in December 2020.

The Indian High Commission in Islamabad held a ceremony to commemorate its Independence Day on Tuesday morning but no Pakistani guest was invited.

The Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi too hosted a limited reception but the Indian government hindered Kashmiri leaders from joining it.

Diplomatic observers are of the view that for the Indian general elections next year Modi’s BJP will contest the polls on an anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim agenda. In the midst of all this, the scope for any improvement of relations is minimal for the time being — at least till the polls are held in India.

PM Shehbaz hopeful of finalising caretaker PM today

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has indicated that the name of the caretaker prime minister is expected to be finalised following his last round of consultations with Opposition Leader Raja Riaz in Islamabad today (Saturday).

If the premier and Riaz do not agree on a name today, the matter will then be referred to a parliamentary committee, as Saturday is the third and the last day to make a decision in the wake of the National Assembly’s dissolution on August 9.

The prime minister, in his address to the leaders of the coalition parties during dinner last night, spoke about his expected meeting with the opposition leader to consult him for finalising the name for the top government post.

“[I] met Raja Riaz yesterday. I will meet [him] tomorrow,” he said, informing that his second round of the meeting, which was to be held on Friday, was postponed due to his busy schedule and Lahore visit.

According to reports, Raja Riaz has suggested the name of Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani as the interim prime minister with general elections expected to take place early next year.

The prime minister’s comment comes after President Dr Arif Alvi wrote a letter to him, reminding him and the opposition leader to suggest a “suitable person” for the interim premier by August 12 (Saturday).

In a letter to both PM Shehbaz and Riaz, the president informed them that under Article 224A they are supposed to propose a name for interim prime minister within three days of the dissolution of the National Assembly.

“As provided in Article 224 (1A) of the Constitution of Pakistan, the Prime Minister and leader of the Opposition in the outgoing National Assembly may propose a suitable person for the appointment of care-taker Prime Minister not later than 12th August,” said President Alvi in the letter.

Commenting on the letter by President Alvi, PM Shehbaz said: “It is a pity that the president of Pakistan has written a letter.”

The premier added that the president has asked him to send the name of the caretaker prime minister by 12am.

PM Shehbaz said the matter of finalising an interim premier’s name spans eight days.

As per the country’s Constitution, if the prime minister and the NA opposition leader fail to agree on the name within three days, the matter goes to the parliamentary committee for the appointment of a caretaker PM.

As per the law, the premier and the opposition leader will send their respective preferences for the coveted post to the parliamentary delegation.

The parliamentary committee will then have to finalise the name of the caretaker prime minister within three days. But if the committee also fails to reach a consensus on the name, then the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) will pick the caretaker prime minister within two days from the names proposed by the opposition and the government.

The premier, while speaking with journalists in Islamabad on Friday, said that the coalition partners would be taken into confidence over the matter before taking a final decision.

‘Nawaz Sharif for country’s interest’

Meanwhile, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Ahsan Iqbal spoke about the first meeting held between the premier and Riaz on Thursday (August 10) for deciding the name for the interim premier following which PM Shehbaz consulted with the allies.

“It is hoped that the decision will be taken by consensus, which requires a lot of consultation,” he said, maintaining how the process can slow down due to deliberations.

The former minister, when speaking during Geo News programme ‘Aaj Shahzeb Khanzada Kay Sath’, said that the matter of the caretaker prime minister would be resolved amicably.

He also clarified that PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif had not insisted on a certain name. The party, in fact, wanted the decision to be taken in the interest of the country, which was to continue the Shehbaz-led government’s policy following Pakistan’s economic state.

“Continuity is essential in the economic situation of the country,” Iqbal said.

Iqbal’s clarification came in response to assumptions that his party is pushing for its own members for the coveted post.

Meanwhile, no names had been officially floated by the PML-N, but mere mentions of former finance minister Ishaq Dar and former premier Shahid Khaqan Abbasi had been doing the rounds for the last few weeks.

The former minister asserted that the caretaker prime minister would choose their caretaker cabinet on their own.

Gen (retd) Raheel Sharif receives lifetime achievement award

A lifetime achievement award was conferred upon former army chief and incumbent Commander-in-Chief of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC), General (retd) Raheel Sharif

Government College University Lahore Vice-Chancellor Prof Dr Asghar Zaidi presented the award to the retired military leader, who spoke to the students about the importance of three Cs in life: Character, Courage, and Competence.

Prof Zaidi mentioned that some students make their alma mater proud, and Gen (retd) Sharif was one of them.

Meanwhile, General (retd) Sharif spoke about his own journey, including his family’s legacy at GCU and the influence of his Old Ravian elder brother, Major Shabbir Sharif Shaheed (Nishan-e-Haider, Military), who was a fearless soldier, embodying the ideals of courage and sacrifice.

The event highlighted Gen (retd) Sharif’s role in eradicating terrorism from the country and his position as the first military commander of the IMCTC, representing 42 countries in the pursuit of global peace and security.

Gen (retd) Sharif was Pakistan’s 9th chief of army staff (COAS) who led the country’s military from 2013 to 2016. He played a huge role in the eradication of terrorism through major anti-terrorism operations across the country.

The most significant of them was Operation Zarb-e-Azb in North Waziristan which obliterated the Taliban strongholds in the region, resulting in the stability of the entire country.

After his retirement, he was appointed to lead the multinational alliance IMCTC at the time of its inception in 2017 and still holds the office.

Bangladesh floods wreak havoc, 48 lives lost

In the wake of relentless monsoon rains and subsequent flooding, the death toll in southeastern Bangladesh has risen to 48, with a number of individuals still reported missing.

Authorities confirmed on Friday that floodwaters have finally begun to recede, offering a glimmer of hope to the flood-ravaged region.

Since Monday, at least 1.2 million people across four southeastern districts – Cox’s Bazar, Chattogram, Bandarban, and Rangamati – have been severely affected by the floods, which have left thousands stranded and numerous homes destroyed. Among the casualties, two Rohingya refugees were tragically among the deceased.

In a concerted effort to provide aid and support, ten military units have joined hands with civil administration to conduct rescue and relief operations. The past four days have seen non-stop efforts to reach affected communities and deliver essential supplies.

Rakib Hasan, a senior official in Chattogram district, reported that while the waters are slowly receding, several areas remain marooned by floodwaters. He emphasised the ongoing necessity for potable water and sustenance for the affected populace. “We, with the assistance of army personnel and locals, continue the relief operation as people require potable water and food,” Hasan said.

The district of Bandarban, nestled in the hills, witnessed 10 fatalities and around 15,000 residents grappling with the aftermath of the floods. The deluge managed to destroy 3,700 homes, leaving families without shelter.

As the country’s largest man-made lake, Kaptai Lake in Rangamati district played a significant role in the flooding, causing water levels to surge. Even now, floodwaters persist in low-lying areas, exacerbating the crisis. The situation has led to the destruction of homes, crops, livestock, and fish pounds, leaving the locals in dire need.

With meteorologists predicting monsoon rains until August 15, the challenge for relief and rescue teams remains daunting.

IS attack on Syria army bus kills 26 soldiers: monitor

Despite losing their last piece of territory in Syria in 2019, IS has maintained hideouts in the vast Syrian desert from which it has carried out ambushes and hit-and-run attacks.

IS “members targeted a military bus” in Deir Ezzor province on Thursday, said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

“The number of dead has risen to 26” soldiers, it said, revising an earlier toll of 23 and calling it the extremists’ deadliest attack on government forces this year.

The jihadists surrounded the bus and opened fire in Deir Ezzor province’s Mayadeen area, in Syria’s vast Badia desert, the Observatory added.

Eleven other soldiers were wounded, with some in critical condition, while troops previously thought to be missing were on other buses that managed to reach safe areas, said the Britain-based group which relies on a network of sources inside Syria.

The official Syrian news agency SANA said the “terrorist attack” had caused a number of military casualties, citing an unidentified army source.

Syrian government forces and their allied pro-Iranian armed groups deployed in the area were on high alert on Friday morning, the Observatory reported.

The war monitor’s Rami Abdel Rahman said IS “has recently been escalating its deadly military attacks… aiming to cause as many deaths as possible”.

By doing so, the jihadists are trying to show that IS “is still active and powerful despite the targeting of its leaders”, he told AFP.

Last week, IS announced the death of its leader Abu al-Hussein al-Husseini al-Qurashi, who it said was killed in clashes in northwestern Syria.

A spokesman for the group announced a new leader, known as Abu Hafs al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, in a recorded message on its channels on the Telegram messaging app.

Spate of IS attacks

In March 2019, IS lost the last territory it held in Syria to a Kurdish-led counteroffensive backed by a US-led coalition, but jihadist remnants continue to carry out deadly attacks.

Targets have included civilians and Kurdish-led fighters as well as government troops and allied pro-Iranian fighters.

IS members in recent weeks have increased their attacks in Syria’s north and northeast.

Thursday’s attack was the third carried out by the jihadists this month alone.

Earlier this week, 10 Syrian soldiers and pro-government fighters were killed in an IS attack in the former jihadist stronghold of Raqa province, the Observatory said.

Last week, the jihadists attacked a convoy of oil tankers guarded by the army in the Syrian desert, killing seven people including two civilians.

And last month, IS claimed responsibility for a rare bombing in Damascus that killed at least six people near the capital’s Sayyida Zeinab mausoleum, Syria’s most visited Shiite pilgrimage site.

The Sunni Muslim extremist group’s brutal rule was marked by beheadings and mass shootings.

IS has had five leaders since it lost the last remnant of the once sprawling “caliphate” it proclaimed across large swathes of Syria and neighbouring Iraq in 2014.

Four of them were killed, including the group’s first “caliph”, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who died in a US raid in October 2019.

Civil war first broke out in Syria after President Bashar al-Assad’s government crushed peaceful protests in 2011. It has since drawn in foreign powers and global jihadists.

The conflict has killed more than half a million people and driven half of the country’s pre-war population from their homes, with many seeking refuge in neighbouring countries.

Maui wildfire death toll hits 67 as questions raised over warnings

The fires became the deadliest natural disaster in the state’s history, surpassing that of a tsunami that killed 61 people on the Big Island of Hawaii in 1960, a year after Hawaii joined the United States.

Officials have warned that search teams with cadaver dogs could still find more dead from the fire that torched 1,000 buildings and left thousands homeless, likely requiring many years and billions of dollars to rebuild.

“Nobody has entered any of these structures that have burned down and that’s where we unfortunately anticipate that the death toll will rise significantly,” U.S. Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii told MSNBC.

He later told CNN that Lahaina resembled a bombed-out war zone where the heat melted engine blocks.

The Lahaina fire that spread from the brush to town was still burning but 85% contained, Maui County said in a statement. Two other wildfires on the island were 80% and 50% contained.

Three days after the disaster, it remained unclear whether some residents had received any warning before the fire engulfed their homes.

The island includes emergency sirens intended to warn of natural disasters and other threats, but they did not appear to have sounded during the fire.

“I authorized a comprehensive review this morning to make sure that we know exactly what happened and when,” Hawaii Governor Josh Green told CNN, referring the warning sirens.

Officials have not offered a detailed picture of precisely what notifications were sent out, and whether they were done via text message, email or phone calls.

Green described multiple, simultaneous challenges, with telecommunications down and firefighters concentrating on other major wildfires when the greatest threat to Lahaina arose.

In any event, he said, “We will do all that we can to find out how to protect our people more going forward.”

Maui County Fire Chief Bradford Ventura said at a Thursday press conference that the fire’s speed made it “nearly impossible” for frontline responders to communicate with the emergency management officials who would typically provide real-time evacuation orders.

“They were basically self-evacuating with fairly little notice,” he said, referring to residents of the neighborhood where the fire initially struck.

County Mayor Richard Bissen told NBC’s “Today” show on Friday that he did not know whether sirens went off but said the fire moved extraordinarily quickly.

“I think this was an impossible situation,” he said.

The disaster began unfolding just after midnight on Tuesday when a brush fire was reported in the town of Kula, roughly 35 miles (56 km) from Lahaina. About five hours later that morning, power was knocked out in Lahaina, according to residents.

In updates posted on Facebook that morning, Maui County said the Kula fire had consumed hundreds of acres of pastureland, but that a small three-acre (1.2-hecatre) brush fire that cropped up in Lahaina had been contained.

By that afternoon, however, the situation had turned more dire. At around 3:30 p.m., according to the county’s updates, the Lahaina fire suddenly flared up. Some residents began evacuating while people, including hotel guests, on the town’s west side were instructed to shelter in place.

In the ensuing hours, the county posted a series of evacuation orders on Facebook as the fire spread through the town.

Some witnesses said they had little advance notice, describing their terror when the blaze consumed Lahaina in what seemed a matter of minutes. Several people were forced to leap into the Pacific Ocean to save themselves.

The Lahaina evacuation was complicated by its coastal location next to hills, meaning there were only two ways out, at best, said Andrew Rumbach, a specialist in climate and communities at the Urban Institute in Washington.

“This is the nightmare scenario,” said Rumbach, a former urban planning professor at the University of Hawaii. “A fast-moving fire in a densely populated place with difficult communications, and not a lot of good options in terms of evacuations.”

More rail strikes over pay and conditions will take place on Saturday 26 August and Saturday 2 September, the RMT union has announced.

About 20,000 members working for 14 train operating companies are expected to take part.

RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said that its members would “continue fighting”.

But the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) said the union was “once again targeting customers” on the railways.

The government called the move “disappointing” and said the RMT leadership was “cynically targeting” travellers.

The announcement means rail passengers can expect disruption on the last Bank Holiday weekend of the summer in August.

It marks the latest step in a long-running dispute which has caused months of upheaval on the railways for passengers.

The 14 train firms affected are:

  • Avanti West Coast
  • c2c
  • Chiltern Railways
  • Cross Country Trains
  • East Midlands Railway
  • Great Western Railway
  • Greater Anglia
  • LNER
  • Northern Trains
  • South Eastern
  • South Western Railway
  • Transpennine Express
  • West Midlands Trains and GTR (including Gatwick Express)

Progress in the RMT’s dispute with the 14 train operating companies has effectively been at a standstill since April, after it rejected the latest proposals from the RDG.

Mr Lynch said the mood among RMT members “remains solid and determined” in the national dispute, which is over pay, job security and working conditions.

The union said it had been left with “little choice but to take further action”, insisting it had seen no improved offer from the RDG, which represents train operating companies.

Plans to close hundreds of ticket offices in England have also angered its members, the union has said.

But a spokesperson for the RDG, said: “With further strike action, the RMT are once again targeting customers looking to enjoy various sporting events, festivals and the end of the summer holidays, disrupting their plans and forcing more cars onto the road.”

The RDG said it had made three offers to the union, including job security guarantees. The headline pay rise would be a backdated pay rise of 5% for last year, followed by 4% this year. But some workers could see pay rise by as much as 13% over the two years, the RDG claims.

The group said the RMT had blocked potential deals “without a convincing explanation”.

It added that it remained “open to talks” and continues to urge the union to put the offer to members in a vote.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “The RMT leadership’s decision to call more strikes and cynically target the travelling public over the Bank Holiday weekend is disappointing.”The government has facilitated fair and reasonable pay offers. However, union bosses are opting to prolong this dispute by blocking their members from having a vote on these offers – we continue to urge that members are given their say, and disruption is brought to an end”, they added.