Imran Khan, Pakistan’s hugely popular former prime minister, was arrested on Tuesday on corruption charges – a moment he had successfully avoided for several months.

Previous attempts had ended in near misses. In March, a court order to detain him was thwarted by pitched battles between his supporters and police outside his home in Lahore.

His arrest, which happened while he was in court in the capital Islamabad, was no less dramatic. The 70-year-old is barely visible among a swarm of officers in riot gear as they escort him outside and bundle him into a vehicle.

Mr Khan has faced dozens of charges, from corruption to sedition, since he was ousted after losing a confidence vote last year. So his arrest is not unexpected.

But it has enraged his supporters and even shocked a country that was hoping for an end to the political stand-off that has pushed Pakistan to the brink.

Why was Khan arrested?

Pakistan’s government says he was taken into a custody for not co-operating with authorities in an ongoing corruption investigation.

The case alleges that Mr Khan, while he was the PM, received land as a bribe in exchange for political favours. It revolves around an investigation conducted by Britain’s National Crime Agency into “laundered” money by Pakistan’s biggest property tycoon Malik Riaz Hussain.

Mr Hussain allegedly gave the land to the Al-Qadir Trust, which was set up by Mr Khan’s third wife, Bushra Bibi. Mr Khan, who denied the charges, said that the land had been donated for charitable purposes.

Mr Hussain denied laundering money. But his position on the question of land for favours is not known – he appeared before Pakistan’s National Accountability Bureau investigators earlier this year and recorded a statement in the Al-Qadir Trust case, but it has not been made public or reported in the media.

Since his arrest Mr Khan has been indicted in another graft case. This one alleges he did not disclose money he earned by selling gifts he had received on foreign visits as PM. A hearing in this case saw charges pressed for the first time against Mr Khan on Wednesday and he pleaded not guilty.

Mr Khan’s arrest on graft charges has sparked protests across Pakistan

Analysts believe that now that he is in custody, courts might indict him in a series of cases – a fate he has repeatedly avoided by either missing the appointment, or appearing in higher courts, heavily guarded, only to apply for protective bail. He was, in fact, in court on Tuesday to seek protective bail against arrest when he was finally whisked off into custody.

Mr Khan himself seemed to have been prepared for it. After he was detained, he released a video that had been recorded earlier, saying it was likely he would be arrested by the time his supporters saw the message.

But it’s possible neither he nor his lawyers expected him to be arrested on the court premises because Mr Khan has appeared in court for bail before. But this time the executors of the warrant were not police, but a paramilitary force, the Punjab Rangers.

Leaders and supporters of Mr Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party argue this is proof of the army’s involvement. They say the arrest has little to do with corruption charges and everything to do with Mr Khan’s ongoing public battle with the army. He has accused the army and the spy agency, the Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI), of conspiring to assassinate him – he survived a shooting last year.

The country’s generals, who have seized power three times since Pakistan’s independence in 1947, have long played a prominent role in politics. Mr Khan too was believed to have their support as he rose to power. But the privilege of his birth, his fame born of cricketing glory, and his charisma drove his popularity far higher than anything Pakistan has seen in recent year

Watch: Peacocks abducted as Khan protesters damage army sites

When he was ousted as PM, many believed it was as much the result of his poor track record in office, as it was a falling out with the army. But he quickly went on the offensive, criticising the army and embracing a populist narrative that resonated with people. And he did this loudly, holding rallies and marches that drew massive crowds and campaigning for local elections, most of which his party went on to win.

This continued for months even as Mr Khan managed to evade arrest. Then he publicly accused an intelligence official of trying to assassinate him. Infuriated army officials denied the charge, and just the day before his arrest, warned him not to repeat it.

Now, with the military’s gloves off, Mr Khan’s supporters say the army has crossed a “red line” – that of the former PM himself. And as public anger turns against the army, Pakistan is witnessing an unprecedented moment.

In a statement the military said 9 May would be remembered as “a dark chapter” and warned of an “extreme reaction” if protesters carried out more attacks on military and other state installations.

What is at stake now?

The uncertainty surrounding Mr Khan has paralysed Pakistan for months.

The nuclear-armed state of 231 million people is already battling soaring food prices, a long-running economic crisis and extremist violence. Talks with the IMF over a much-needed bailout have stalled, and elections, due this year, are also caught in the political stalemate.

Analysts believe that Mr Khan’s arrest only adds to the growing instability and diminishes any chance of a resolution between the former PM and the establishment, be it the government or the army.

The 13-member coalition which is in power – led by Prime Minister Shabaz Sharif – says it has “nothing to do with the arrest”, which followed due process.

But others say Mr Khan’s arrest benefits the government because if he is found guilty, he would be disqualified from contesting elections, possibly for life.

Mr Khan’s rise to the top of Pakistani politics was almost as meteoric as his sporting career. He even managed to recast himself from a playboy cricketing icon into a pious politician as he sought the top job in the country.

But the army – which many believe had allied with him on his route to the PM’s chair, despite denials from both parties – now appears to be on the other side.

What that means for Mr Khan and Pakistan is still unclear because the country finds itself in uncharted waters.

Turkey elections: Young voters who could decide Turkey’s future

He was jailed and spent almost two months in solitary confinement for taking part in a protest at the prestigious Bogazici University over the appointment of a pro-government dean.

Perit has voted only once before, and his friends Sude and Emru are among five million first-time voters who have known no other Turkish leader but Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Life for young people in Turkey has become increasingly difficult, Emru complained, pointing to soaring inflation of currently 44% according to official figures.

“You can’t afford to just study, you also have to get a full-time job to get by.”

Perit (L), Sude and Emru (R) are planning to vote for the opposition in the upcoming elections

Like her friends, Sude plans to vote for the opposition in Sunday’s presidential and parliamentary elections.

“I don’t feel safe for expressing my emotions or opinions. Because whenever I do I get attacked,” she said. She was handed a suspended jail sentence of 12 months earlier this year, for attending protests at Bogazici University.

Perit believes that after 20 years of Mr Erdogan and his AK Party in power, the time for change has come.

“Two decades is such a long time to change people’s mentality: people’s understanding of democracy and human rights. If Erdogan wins again this could be our last election. Regime could change.”

Female voters initially backed Mr Erdogan in big numbers

The election race is very tight and President Erdogan is facing his biggest challenge yet from opposition candidate Kemal Kilicdaroglu, who represents a bloc of six parties and has also secured the backing of more opposition groups.

The millions of of first-time voters make up almost 8% of the electorate, and many in Turkey see them as the largest group of undecided voters.

For Salih aged 20, the choice could not be clearer. “I think Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a charismatic leader, it’s important to have such charisma in Turkish politics,” he told the BBC.

He believes Mr Erdogan can build on his previous achievements, investing in Turkey’s future.

“Previously there were problems over energy supply and Turkey was dependent on other countries militarily. But now we are producing our own cars, UAVs (drones) and aircraft. Mr Erdogan solved all our problems,” he said.

Mr Kilicdaroglu’s heart-shaped hand gesture translates well with young voters

Unsurprisingly all the candidates challenging for the presidency have tried to woo young voters.

While Mr Erdogan has emphasised advances in defence and technology, Mr Kilicdaroglu has promised greater freedoms and better employment prospects.

But Gizem, 20, argues it is the president who has improved freedoms in Turkey.

“Everyone is free to do whatever they like now. It was the opposition who curbed freedoms decades ago. Girls wearing headscarves like I do were not allowed in universities,” she said.

One of Mr Erdogan’s landmark reforms was to lift a decades-old ban on Islamist headscarves in universities and the civil service.

“If we have teachers, doctors, engineers wearing headscarves in this country today, that is all thanks to the freedoms Mr Erdogan has granted. If it wasn’t for him, we would still be oppressed in the name of secularism,” she explained.

Gizem is grateful to the president for lifting the headscarf ban

Mr Kilicdaroglu introduced a bill in parliament last year to secure the right of female public servants to wear headscarves. Mr Erdogan responded by offering to take the issue to a referendum instead. The issue has since been shelved.

Two other candidates are challenging for the presidency: Muharrem Ince, a nationalist centre-left politician and Sinan Ogan, from the nationalist right.

Recent polls suggest that both of them appeal mainly to young voters, so supporters of the main opposition bloc fear they could erode Mr Kilicdaroglu’s vote and force the elections into a second round run-off two weeks later.

To win outright on Sunday, a candidate will have to secure more than half the vote.

Protests have taken place in Turkey

The votes of women will also be decisive, and they make up 50.6% of the whole electorate.

It is thought that conservative women helped bring Mr Erdogan to power two decades ago, but that support is now dwindling.

His decision to pull Turkey out of the Istanbul Convention – an international accord designed to protect women against domestic violence – has alienated many women and prompted large protests.

In the past he has referred to women who are not mothers “half a woman”. He advised women to have at least three children and said men and women could not be treated equally.

One of the party’s in his People’s Alliance is an extreme Islamist party called Huda Par (Free Cause) and that has raised concerns among female MPs in his own AK Party.

Feminist Gulsum Kav argues the government does not believe in sexual equality and says women’s freedoms have been curbed: “They get attacked for wearing shorts, female musicians are threatened with jail terms because of how they dress, and artists get sentenced for criticising a sex assault case.”

“They want women to sit at home and do nothing. But women have changed. They will change Turkey too.”

Israel has killed the head of Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s (PIJ) rocket launching force in a pre-dawn air strike on an apartment in Gaza.

It said the commander and two other PIJ militants killed in the hit on the fifth floor of a building near Khan Younis in the south of the territory.

On Wednesday militants in Gaza fired more than 500 rockets at Israel.

The Israeli military hit more than 130 militant targets in Gaza, in the heaviest fighting in nine months.

Twenty-five people have been killed in Gaza since Tuesday morning when Israel began its operation against the PIJ, the Palestinian Ministry of Health there says. Those killed include at least 10 civilians and three other PIJ commanders.

The Israeli military said four people, including three children, had been killed in Gaza by rockets falling short, though this has not been corroborated by Palestinian sources.

There have been no fatalities in Israel, though some rockets have hit homes and buildings. Most have landed in open areas or been intercepted.

The armed wing of the PIJ confirmed that the head of its missile unit, Ali Hassan Ghali, also known as Abu Muhammad, had died in Thursday morning’s attack.

The PIJ is the second biggest militant group in Gaza after Hamas, and has been responsible for many of the rocket attacks on Israel in recent years

Israel’s military confirmed it had targeted Ghali and what it called two “other Islamic Jihad operatives in Gaza”.

They described the commander as a central figure in the PIJ who had been “responsible for the recent rocket barrages launched against Israel”.

Israel hit a fifth floor apartment, killing the commander and two other militants

On Wednesday night, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that Israel’s campaign was not over.

“We have hit Islamic Jihad with the most significant blow it has ever suffered,” he said, referring to the killing of the three PIJ commanders on Tuesday.

Egypt is reported to be working to try to secure a truce between the two sides.

This week’s air strikes were the deadliest since three days of hostilities between Israel and PIJ last August, in which 49 Palestinians were killed in Gaza.

More than 460 rockets have been fire at Israel

There was a serious flare-up last week, as PIJ and other groups fired more than 100 rockets into Israel over two days, following the death in an Israeli prison of a Palestinian hunger striker. The Israeli military carried out air strikes on sites it said were linked to Hamas in response.

Tensions also remained high in the occupied West Bank on Wednesday, after Israel carried out arrest raids.

Three Palestinians were killed in the town of Qabatiya by Israeli forces, who said the pair had fired at them. An Israeli soldier was also seriously wounded during a separate exchange of fire with Palestinian gunmen in Tubas.

Pakistan, China, Afghanistan vow action against terrorist outfits including TTP

Pakistan, China and Afghanistan have resolved that no terrorist organisation, group or individual will be allowed to use their territories to threaten the security and interests of the region.

Pakistan, China and Afghanistan have resolved that no terrorist organisation, group or individual will be allowed to use their territories to threaten the security and interests of the region.

The pledge came after Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari, Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang and Afghan Acting Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi held the 5th China-Afghanistan-Pakistan Foreign Ministers’ Dialogue in Islamabad on May 6, 2023, the Foreign Office said in a statement on Monday.

The three sides stressed the need of not allowing any individual, group or party, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) etc, to use their territories to harm and threaten regional security and interests, or conduct terrorist actions and activities, it added.

The communique also said all three sides underscored the need to refrain from intervening in internal affairs of Afghanistan, and to promote Afghan peace, stability and reconstruction.

“Stressing that a peaceful, stable and prosperous Afghanistan serves the common interest of the region, the Foreign Ministers underscored the critical importance of trilateral cooperation in promoting this objective. The three sides resolved to further deepen and expand their cooperation in the security, development and political domains based on the principles of mutual respect, equal-footed consultation and mutual benefit,” read the FO statement.

They also underscored the need to tackle security challenges posing a serious threat to regional and global security, and directly impacting the stability and economic prosperity of the entire region.

“The three sides agreed to coordinate and cooperate on security, organised crimes, drugs smuggling etc. and called on the international community to strengthen bilateral and multilateral cooperation, and provide necessary supplies, equipment and technical assistance in this regard to the relevant countries.”

‘CPEC to be extended to Afghanistan’

Underscoring the imperative to generate economic activity within Afghanistan, the ministers stressed the importance of exploring realistic pathways towards the revival of the Afghan economy. To this end, they agreed to consider further supporting the reconstruction of Afghanistan and exploring trilateral investment possibilities aimed at industrialisation and job creation.

Expressing solidarity with the people of Afghanistan, the three sides stressed the importance of sustained and urgent humanitarian support to the people of Afghanistan including the imperative to bridge funding gaps for humanitarian operations and underlined that humanitarian support to the people of Afghanistan must remain delinked from any political considerations.

The three sides reaffirmed their resolve to fully harness Afghanistan’s potential as a hub for regional connectivity. “Reaffirming their commitment to further the trilateral cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and to jointly extend the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor to Afghanistan.”

The FO the three sides stressed that the importance of existing projects including CASA-1000, TAPI, Trans-Afghan Railways etc. would enhance regional connectivity as well as ensure economic uplift and prosperity for the peoples of this region.

“Hard and soft connectivity”

The foreign office further said the three top diplomats emphasised pushing forward the “hard connectivity” in infrastructure and “soft connectivity” in norms and standards, further exploring the facilitating measures for the movement of people and trade activities between the three countries. The three sides agreed to enhance transit trade through Gwadar Port.

Expressing satisfaction at the existing trilateral cooperation, the three sides agreed to carry out exchange and training programs and to strengthen people-to-people exchanges by conducting the trilateral programs in line with the List of China-Afghanistan-Pakistan Trilateral Practical Cooperation Projects, adopted by Foreign Ministers in this dialogue.

The three sides reaffirmed continued cooperation in areas of mutual interest like economic development, capacity building, and improving livelihoods. The ministers agreed to strengthen cooperation in the fields such as agriculture, trade, energy, capacity building, border management etc.

World community urged to engage with Afghanistan

The foreign ministers called upon the international community to engage constructively with the Afghan side. In this regard, they acknowledged the efforts made under the aegis of various mechanisms and formats, including in particular, the Neighbouring Countries of Afghanistan, to promote dialogue and constructive engagement with the Interim Afghan Government. The three sides also urged the international community to assist Afghanistan in countering narcotics effectively and develop alternative crops to enhance its capacity for independent and sustainable development.

The three sides urged the relevant countries to lift their unilateral sanctions against Afghanistan and return the assets overseas for the benefit of the Afghan people, and create opportunities for economic development and prosperity in Afghanistan.

Taking note of the Afghan interim government’s repeated assurances to respect and protect women’s rights and interests, the three sides called on the international community to support the reconstruction and development of Afghanistan, and help Afghanistan to improve governance and strengthen the capacity building, so as to effectively protect the basic rights and interests of all segments of the Afghan society, including women and children.

The ministers expressed appreciation to the neighbouring countries, in particular, Pakistan, for the generous hospitality in hosting millions of Afghan refugees, and called on the international community to provide necessary support and assistance to these countries and Afghanistan for the dignified return and reintegration of refugees into the Afghan society.

The three sides resolved to continue with the trilateral cooperation mechanism, including the Director-General Level Practical Cooperation Dialogue, and forge closer-good neighbourly relations and partnerships.

China and Afghanistan thanked Pakistan for the successful organisation of the 5th China-Afghanistan-Pakistan Foreign Ministers’ Dialogue and its warm hospitality.

Army assails Imran Khan over ‘malicious allegations against senior military officer’

RAWALPINDI: The army came down hard on Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan Monday for his “irresponsible and baseless allegations” against a senior military officer, who is currently serving in the armed forces.

“[The] chairman PTI has levelled highly irresponsible and baseless allegations against a serving senior military officer without any evidence,” Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director-General Major General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said in a statement, as Khan continues his tirade against the establishment.

 

The PTI chief has claimed that the senior military officer, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah were behind the assassination attempt on him on November 3, 2022, but provided no evidence to authorities so far, while all the people accused have rejected the allegations.

“These fabricated and malicious allegations are extremely unfortunate, deplorable and unacceptable,” the top military spokesperson said.

Senior analyst Shahzeb Khanzada said although what happened with the deposed prime minister in November was a tragedy, his track record forces one to believe that he might be targeting people to bolster his political support, with anchorperson Muneeb Farooq backing his analysis.

Khan has also blamed former army chief General (retd) Qamar Javed Bajwa for his government’s ouster in April last year, but has still not been able to prove it.

The army’s spokesperson, in the statement, also said that a pattern has been witnessed over the last year, wherein, the army personnel are targetted for one’s political motives.

“This has been a consistent pattern for [the] last one year wherein military and intelligence agencies officials are targeted with insinuations and sensational propaganda for the furtherance of political objectives.”

The ISPR DG added that politicos should refrain from making baseless allegations and warned that if such a trend were to continue, the army had the right to take legal action.

“We ask the political leader concerned to make recourse to legal avenues and stop making false allegations. The institution reserves the right to take legal course of action against patently false and malafide statements and propaganda.”

Earlier, in response to Khan’s allegations right a day after he was shot, the army had said that his “baseless and irresponsible allegations” against the institution and particularly a senior army officer are “absolutely unacceptable and uncalled for”.

‘Are military officers above the law?’

Before the army’s statement, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had condemned the PTI chief’s tirade against the senior military officer. At this, Khan slammed the premier, asking whether “[military] officers were above the law?”

“As someone who has suffered 2 assassination attempts on his life in last few months, can I dare to ask SS the following Qs: Have I, a citizen, the right to nominate those I feel were responsible for assassination attacks on me? Why was I denied my legal & Constitutional right to register an FIR?”

“Does SS tweet mean mly officers are above the law or that they cannot commit a crime?” he wondered. The PTI chief further asked that if a person is being blamed for a crime, how can it be perceived that an entire institution is being maligned?

“Who was so powerful as to sabotage Wazirabad JIT while PTI govt was in power in Punjab?”

Khan, without naming anyone, said that when PM Shehbaz can truthfully answer all his questions, it would point to one powerful man and his accomplices “all being above the law”.

“Then it is time for us to officially declare that in Pakistan there is only law of the jungle where Might is Right.”

US voices opposition to Syria’s readmission to Arab League

The United States has voiced opposition to the Arab League’s readmission of Syria to its fold, as a statement released by White House said that it would not normalise ties with the regime of Bashar al-Assad, a foreign news agency reported.

The international forum readmitted Syria after over a decade of suspension, consolidating a regional push to normalise its strained relations ties with Assad, in a move highly criticised by Washington.

“We continue to believe that we will not normalise our relations with the Assad regime and we don’t support our allies and partners doing so either,” State Department spokesman Vedant Patel told the reporters.

He said that the Syrian president didn’t deserve the normalisation of ties after a waging a brutal war.

“We do not believe that Syria merits readmission to the Arab League at this time.”

Reaffirming its stance on Assad-led Syria, Washington announced that the US sanctions on the middle eastern nation remain in full effect.

The United States has consistently withstood reconciliation with Syria but the Arab League voted on Sunday to welcome back Syria, effectively concluding that Assad had won the war that has killed half a million people and displaced half the pre-war population since 2011.

The league had closed its doors to Damascus in 2011 for brutally crushing the peaceful protests that erupted earlier that year and escalated into a full-scale military conflict that has so far claimed the lives of 500,000 people, uprooted millions and left the country’s industry and infrastructure in shambles.

The decision, which means Syria can resume its participation in Arab League meetings immediately, also calls for a resolution of the crisis resulting from the country’s civil war, including the flight of refugees to neighbouring countries and drug smuggling across the region.

Russia to ‘develop’ its military facilities in Kyrgyzstan

“The heads of state emphasised the importance of strengthening the Kyrgyz Republic’s armed forces and developing Russian military facilities on its territory,” the Kremlin said in a statement.

Kyrgyzstan, a majority-Muslim country of nearly seven million people, hosts a Russian military base made up of an airfield, a naval installation on Lake Issyk-Kul and several other sites.

President Sadyr Japarov met Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday, on the eve of Victory Day, a Soviet war anniversary to be marked by an army parade through Red Square.

Japarov will be one of several foreign leaders to attend the parade this year.

Russia and Kyrgyzstan, an ex-Soviet republic, are linked through a Moscow-led military alliance, the Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO).

According to the statement released by the Kremlin, the two countries also expect to “deepen military and technical cooperation” as well as their economic and cultural relations in order to “reach a new level of integration”.

At least 12 Palestinians, including three commanders of the militant group Islamic Jihad, have been killed in Israeli air strikes on the Gaza Strip.

Palestinian health officials said three women and three children were among the dead. Another 20 people were injured.

Israel said it had launched an operation targeting militants who posed an imminent threat to its citizens.

Islamic Jihad has vowed revenge and Gaza-based militants are expected to respond with rocket fire into Israel.

Correspondents say one significant factor will be the extent to which Hamas, which controls the Strip, joins in.

Israel officials are said to be preparing for days of fighting.

Forty Israeli warplanes and helicopters attacked in several waves of pre-dawn air strikes across Gaza, hitting homes and causing panic among residents.

Pictures showed at least two apartments with their fronts ripped away and others damaged.

The Israeli military said that in addition to targeting the three militants its aircraft struck 10 sites used to manufacture weapons and six Islamic Jihad military facilities.

Islamic Jihad’s military wing, the al-Quds Brigades, confirmed that three commanders were among those killed.

It identified them as Jihad Shaker al-Ghannam, secretary of the al-Quds Brigades’ Military Council; Khalil Salah al-Bahtini, the commander of its Northern Region, and Tariq Muhammad Ezzedine, a leader of its military activities in the occupied West Bank.

“As we mourn our martyr leaders, along with their mujahideen wives and a number of their children, we affirm that the blood of the martyrs will increase our resolve,” the al-Quds Brigades said.

“We will not leave our positions, and the resistance will continue, God willing.”

Israel’s Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant, said: “Any terrorist who harms Israeli citizens will be made to regret it.”

Islamic Jihad was behind recent rounds of rocket fire into Israel, some of which was sparked by the death in an Israeli prison of a Palestinian hunger striker.

Tens of thousands of Serbs have joined protests against gun violence in the capital Belgrade and another city after two mass shootings last week.

Seventeen people died in the shootings on Wednesday and Thursday, including eight children in a primary school.

The protesters are demanding that top government officials resign, and want newspapers and TV stations that they say promote violence to be shut down.

Serbia’s President, Aleksandar Vucic, condemned the protests.

He accused the opposition of capitalising on a national tragedy to promote their own interests. He said he was ready to test his party’s popularity at a snap vote.

“I will continue to work and I will never back down before the street and the mob… Whether it will be a reshuffle of the government or an election, we shall see,” he said on TV.

The next parliamentary elections are set to take place in 2026.

Police were stationed near all of Belgrade’s schools as they restarted classes on Monday. The government is planning to recruit more officers to be stationed at schools.

Crowds marched through the centre of the city behind a banner that read “Serbia against violence”.

“We are here because we can’t wait any longer. We’ve waited too long, we’ve been silent too long, we’ve turned our heads too long,” Marina Vidojevic, a schoolteacher, told the crowd, as quoted by AFP news agency.

“We want safe schools, streets, villages and cities for all children.”

Thousands also turned out across the northern city of Novi Sad, where protests threw flowers into the Danube river which flows to the capital.

The protesters called for the resignation of the interior minister and the head of Serbia’s intelligence agency.

Serbia’s Education Minister, Branko Ruzic, stepped down on Sunday, citing the “cataclysmic tragedy” of the recent school massacre in his resignation letter.

In Novi Sad, protesters threw flowers into the Danube river

Serbia has the highest rates of gun ownership in Europe. A 2018 survey suggests there are 39 guns for every hundred people in Serbia – the vast majority unlicensed.

Mr Vucic has started a one-month amnesty for surrendering illegal weapons, with people able to drop of their guns to police with no questions asked.

The amnesty will last 30 days.

On the first day of the amnesty around 1,500 guns were surrendered, according to Serbian police.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer will tell his senior shadow ministers there is “more work to be done” after last week’s strong local election results.

He will say the “hardest part lies ahead” and Labour must show it can form a “big reforming government”.

Labour gained more than 500 councillors in last week’s elections, while the Conservatives lost more than 1,000.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will also meet with his Cabinet on Tuesday for the first time since the results.

Sir Keir is due to meet with leaders of all 22 councils which were won by Labour.

They have been tasked with drawing up “emergency cost of living plans” within their first 100 days, as well as reviewing local housing and development policies.

Labour took control of councils in some areas which voted heavily for Brexit, such as Dover and Stoke on Trent, and Sir Keir will tell the shadow cabinet that “people who turned away from us during the Corbyn years and the Brexit years are coming back”.

“But there is understandably a lot of scepticism about politics out there and now we need to go from reassurance to hope,” he will say.

“We need to show that we will be a big reforming government bringing hope of a better life for working people.”

 

He will say that Labour will put a “plan to rebuild the NHS at the heart of our offer to the British people”, with further announcements on the party’s plans expected in the coming weeks.

The Shadow Levelling Up Secretary Lisa Nandy also confirmed reports in the Financial Times that the party was considering raising stamp duty for overseas buyers and stopping them from buying more than 50% of any new development.

Mr Sunak has described the loss of more than 1,000 councillors as “disappointing” but insisted he would “strain every sinew” to fulfil his pledges on the economy, NHS waiting lists and small boats.

He has responded to his party’s losses by doubling down on his five key pledges on the economy, NHS waiting lists and small boats.

Asked if he would apologise to councillors who had lost their seats, Mr Sunak said it was “always disappointing to lose hardworking councillors” but said his job was “to deliver for the country”

“We want to halve inflation, grow the economy, reduce the debt, cut waiting lists and stop the boats,” he added.

“Those are the country’s priorities and me and the government are going to keep working incredibly hard to deliver on those.”

With Coronation celebrations over, the PM – pictured here with US first lady Jill Biden – is set to meet his Cabinet

Some Conservative MPs have privately suggested Mr Sunak is likely to need to go beyond reiterating his promise to deliver those pledges in order to improve the Conservatives’ position before a general election.

The Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, whose party gained more than 400 seats, said he would table a vote of no confidence in the government when Parliament returns later

Sir Ed said: “The local elections showed that the public clearly has no confidence in Sunak or the Conservatives, so it’s time for a general election now.

“There’s only one reason Rishi Sunak would deny British people a say at the ballot box: because he is running scared and knows he’d lose.”

The Liberal Democrats are not able to force a debate on the motion though so it is likely to end up being largely symbolic.