Politicians never shut door on negotiations: ruling alliance

KARACHI: Ruling alliance has decided to hold a meeting after Eid ul Fitr where leaders of all political parties will be assembled so that the ongoing consultation process with parties in parliament and outside could be taken to the next level.

Amid the constitutional crisis in the country, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday presided over a high-level meeting attended by coalition partners — an alliance of 13 political parties in the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) — at the PM House, which discussed the overall situation in the country as well as the future course of action.

“As politicians, we never shut the doors on negotiations and no one who believes in democracy could do so,” the huddle said, reiterating the coalition parties’ belief in the Constitution, democracy and people’s vote as well as the holding of elections.

Earlier this week, sources told Geo News that the ruling allies have hit a snag over holding talks with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).

The coalition partners met in Islamabad after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif convened a meeting on the country’s political situation and the JI’s negotiation efforts.

During the meeting, a disagreement took place among the parties in the coalition government over holding talks with the opposition party as some believed that PTI Chairman Imran Khan could not be trusted, while others insisted that political forces should not shut channels for negotiations.

However, in a turn of events, the ruling alliance during yesterday’s meeting discussed the ongoing issue regarding holding elections on the same date and decided to meet again after Eid to reach a consensus over the final decision.

The meeting also made it clear the coalition parties were already holding deliberations over the conducting elections for which PM Shehbaz has constituted a committee.

The huddle said: “From offering the Charter of Economy at every stage until now, the coalition government has expressed willingness for serious, meaningful and within Constitution talks.

“Ensuring free, fair and transparent elections is fundamental to the Constitution.”

The meeting also decided that all requirements for holding an election would be fulfilled, so that the results could be acceptable to all the parties and the country could avoid another instability, which could hurt the national and economic interests.

Bilawal meets JUI-F chief

In addition, Pakistan Peoples’ Party Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari met PDM chief Maulana Fazl ur Rehman to hold an “extensive discussion” regarding the current political situation.

During the last meeting of the ruling alliance, Bilawal stressed holding dialogue with the opposition, with Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P), Balochistan National Party, Balochistan Awami Party, Chaudhry Salik, and Mohsin Dawar backing him, sources told Geo News.

But representatives of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) and the Jamhoori Wattan Party (JWP) rejected Bilawal’s opinion and said that it isn’t in the coalition’s interests to hold talks with the deposed prime minister — who was ousted from the office via a no-confidence vote in the National Assembly in April last year.

However, Bilawal decided to hold talks directly with the JUI-F chief. Following the meeting, Bilawal took to his Twitter to share the development.

He wrote: “I am optimistic that party heads meeting after Eid will make positive progress. The issues of one-day election across the country [and] modalities for dialogue with opposition will be finalized by then IA,” he said.

FM Bilawal Bhutto to attend SCO meet in India

ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari will lead the Pakistan delegation to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) being held on May 4-5 in Goa, India, Foreign Office Spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch confirmed on Thursday.

 

​The foreign minister is attending the SCO CFM meeting at the invitation of the current Chair of SCO CFM, Dr Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Minister for External Affairs of the Republic of India.

 

“​Our participation in the meeting reflects Pakistan’s commitment to the SCO Charter and processes and the importance that Pakistan accords to the region in its foreign policy priorities,” the spokesperson said.

She said that Pakistan is currently preparing for the meeting.

 

​Bilawal also attended the last meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers held in July last year in Tashkent.

She said Pakistan continues to participate in SCO meetings in keeping with our long-standing commitment to the group.

Minister of Climate Change Sherry Rehman represented Pakistan at the 4th SCO Meeting of Heads of Ministries on Environmental Protection. The meeting was held online in New Delhi on April 18.

The spokesperson stated that the National Disaster Management Authority director virtually attended the SCO Expert Meeting of Heads of Agencies for Prevention and Elimination of Emergency Situations while today Muhammad Idrees Mahsud, Member of Disaster Risk Reduction, is virtually participating in an SCO meeting.

Sudan situation

About the worsening situation in Sudan, the FO spokesperson said, “We continue to follow the worrying developments in Sudan and are closely monitoring the safety and security of the Pakistani community there”.

“Our Embassy in Sudan remains in close and constant contact with our community and will continue to facilitate them. The well-being of Pakistanis remains a key priority of the Government of Pakistan and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”

At least 78 people have been killed in a crush at a school in the Yemeni capital Sanaa during a distribution of charity for Ramadan, officials say.

TV footage shows a crowd of people unable to move and many in distress in the Bab al-Yemen area of the city.

Hundreds of people reportedly crowded into the school late on Wednesday to receive donations amounting to about $9 (£7; €8) per person.

The rebel Houthi movement has controlled Sanaa since 2015.

Video posted on social media shows people screaming with dozens of bodies on the ground, some of which are not moving. Other people are seen trying to help.

Two local businessmen who arranged the event had been arrested and an investigation was under way, the interior ministry said.

A spokesman for the ministry blamed the crush on the “random distribution” of funds without co-ordination with local officials.

Many people were also injured with 13 in a critical situation, a health official in Sanaa said.

“Women and children were among the dead,” a Houthi security official told AFP news agency on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to journalists.

The Associated Press news agency quoted two eyewitnesses who said Houthi fighters had fired into the air in an attempt at crowd control, apparently striking an electrical wire which resulted in an explosion. This caused panic that led to the crush, they added.

The rebels are said to have then sealed off the school and barred people, including journalists, from approaching.

The Houthis have reportedly agreed to pay $2,000 (£1,600) to each family who lost a relative, while the injured would get around $400 (£322).

Yemen basics

  • Yemen has been devastated by a conflict that escalated in 2015, when the Houthis seized large parts of the country and a Saudi-led coalition intervened in support of the Yemeni government
  • More than 150,000 people have died in the conflict, which has widely been seen as a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran
  • More than 23 million people – three-quarters of the population – are in need of some form of aid
  • Yemen’s internationally-recognised government is now based in Aden

The event happened during the final days of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

Last week a major prisoner swap between warring sides in Yemen started, seen as part of stepped-up efforts to end the devastating eight-year conflict.

Mohamed Ali al-Houthi, head of the Houthis’ Supreme Revolutionary Committee, blamed Wednesday’s crush on the country’s humanitarian crisis.

“We hold the countries of aggression responsible for what happened and for the bitter reality that the Yemeni people live in because of the aggression and blockade,” he said on Twitter.

SC cannot go back on its verdict, says CJP Bandial on pleas seeking polls on same date

ISLAMABAD: A day after getting a briefing from military officials, Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial remarked on Wednesday that the Supreme Court had now given a verdict on the Punjab polls and cannot go back on it and the time is to “move on”.

A day earlier, top intelligence officials briefed the apex court on the security situation. Referring to that briefing, CJP Bandial noted that the director general miltary operations briefed the bench while director general Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and defence secretary were also present.

“[While] the briefing of the military authorities was very impressive and shed light on the actual situation [but] when the case was being heard, no one came to give us a briefing. A briefing was given [only] after the Supreme Court had announced its verdict. Now the decision, has been announced, we cannot go back. Now, we must move forward,” CJP Bandial said.

The CJP passed the remark while hearing three pleas seeking elections for all assemblies on the same date. He was heading a three-member bench, also comprising Justice Ijaz Ul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar.

It is the same bench that announced the April 4 verdict directing the government and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to hold snap polls in Punjab next month.

On Tuesday, the Ministry of Defence moved the top court seeking elections across the country on the same date and requested the court to withdraw its order directing Punjab polls on May 14.

However, today two more pleas were filed in the apex court seeking polls across the country simultaneously.

One of the pleas was filed by a citizen Mohammad Arif, while the other one was registered by Advocate Shah Khawar on Sardar Kashif Khan’s behalf.

Subsequently, the court decided to hear the three pleas together.

Today’s hearing

CJP Bandial began today’s hearing with the recitation of a verse from the Quran and prayed that the bench gives the “right verdict”.

“The matter is getting extended. Did the government give the job of the executive to the Parliament or not?” CJP Bandial asked Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan. He also directed the AGP to read the report submitted by the Ministry of Finance.

Justice Akhtar wondered whether the government has ever failed to secure the Parliament’s approval on a supplementary grant.

The AGP told the bench that in 2013, deduction motions were approved. He then added that in the current scenario, there was time to seek approval for the issuance of the funds.

At this, Justice Akhtar told the AGP that the finance ministry has repeatedly said the approval for the supplementary grant is taken later. He added that the finance ministry had cited Article 84 of the Constitution.

AGP Awan informed the judge that the National Assembly had passed a resolution against releasing the funds.

“Are you saying your case is that the government is serious about executing its responsibilities but the parliament has forbidden it?” asked Justice Akhtar. He added that the prime minister had to take the majority of the Parliament into confidence for the approval of the funds for the elections.

“If the funds are not provided for the elections, there may be serious consequences,” warned CJP Bandial on this point. He also hoped that the government would respond positively to the provision of funds for the constitutional process.

The CJP then stated that the bench was briefed on the security situation and wondered why the ECP believes that the situation is much worse than in the past.

“In the past elections were held during terrorism. Elections were also held in the year that Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto was martyred,” said CJP Bandial.

At this point, Justice Akhtar remarked that the prime minister needs to have the support of the majority of the assembly.

“Attorney general, please try to understand the situation is very serious,” he added.

The CJP then told the AGP that he has understood the point of view of the bench, adding that before this, there is no example of sending administrative affairs to the Parliament.

“Election expenses are necessary, not insignificant,” remarked CJP Bandial.

“Who will give the guarantee that the situation will be peaceful on October 8? The Ministry of Defence’s response is not satisfactory,” remarked CJP Bandial.

The top judge also questioned the ECP’s stance on elections and stated that it is leading to multiple questions.

“The basis of the Election Commission’s observation is non-provision of security [but] terrorism has been present since 1992,” remarked CJP Bandial. He added that polls were held in 1987, 1991, 2002, 2008, 2013 and 2018.

“What is the unique danger this time that elections cannot be held?” asked CJP Bandial.

AGP Awan told the bench that last time, all the security forces had performed their duties together but now elections will be held separately in two provinces.

“The defence ministry has also made a guess. The government cannot just run on guesses,” remarked CJP Bandial.

Meanwhile, Justice Ahsan observed that polls were held on time in the United Kingdom despite the country being in a virtual war. He also wondered whether the Constitution mandates that polls be held a year after the dissolution of the assembly.

The AGP responded that all-out efforts were being made so that the specified targets were met during security operations. He added that no one expected that the assemblies would be dissolved before the completion of their tenure.

Justice Akhtar responded that the assembly was dissolved last year and had the court not taken notice, the lower house would not have been restored.

While Justice Ahsan interjected and asked which article gave the court the right to delay elections till next year. He added that the ECP had asked for funds and security for holding elections.

While CJP Bandial stated that hearings in the case began on March 27 and since then, there has been “confusion in mathematics”.

He added that the ratio of the verdict was debated but the Supreme Court was never informed about all the reasons that led to the delay in polls.

Justice Ahsan then noted that the orders related to funds were being “sent from one institution to another.”

To this, the AGP replied: “I understand the message you are trying to convey.”

Justice Ahsan the asked if there was any guarantee that the elections would be conducted on October 8.

The AGP replied that the army has started the operations so that the elections are held as per schedule.

In response Justice Akhtar inquired why the federal government was not using the authority of Article 245.

“Is the constitution not supreme?” He asked.

He then lauded that the armed forces for having sacrificed their lives for the country, adding that everyone should be grateful to the Pakistan Army.

Defence ministry’s petition

The ministry’s view is in line with the federal government’s stance, which has persistently opposed holding separate general elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP).

The tenure of the National Assembly and the legislature of two other provinces — Sindh and Balochistan — will end later this year and the federal government wants the polls to take place then, not in May, as directed by the Supreme Court on April 4.

“…the instant application may be granted, the order dated 04-04-2023 passed in C.P. No. 5/2023 may kindly be recalled with the directions that the general elections to the National and all Provincial Assemblies be held together, upon completion of the term of the National and the other two Provincial Assemblies i.e. of Sindh and Balochistan,” the ministry’s plea stated.

Background

In the April 4 order, the top court ruled that the ECP’s decision to postpone polls of the Punjab Assembly till October 8 was “unconstitutional” and fixed May 14 as the date for polls in Punjab.

“The impugned order dated 22.03.2023 made by the Election Commission of Pakistan is declared to be unconstitutional, without lawful authority or jurisdiction, void ab-initio, of no legal effect and is hereby quashed,” the ruling said. “Neither the Constitution nor the law empowers the Commission to extend the date of elections beyond the 90 days period as provided in Article 224(2) of the Constitution.”

But despite the court’s orders, the government did not budge and got a resolution passed through parliament against the verdict, clearly stating that it would not provide funds to the ECP for polls.

Following the government’s move, the apex court directed the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to release a total of Rs21 billion to the election commission for holding polls, but even after the deadline passed on April 17, the central bank did not release the funds.

In a session of the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue on Monday, SBP Acting Governor Sima Kamil said the central bank had allocated funds — on the SC’s orders — for the polls but lacked the authority to release them.

Furthermore, in a report filed in the top court on Tuesday, the ECP said the conduct of the election on May 14 is getting impossible due to the non-provision of funds and security forces for maintaining law and order.

The PTI had dissolved both assemblies in January in a bid to force the government into holding elections across the board, but the Shehbaz-led administration did not give in to the demand.

With both sides at an impasse, Jamaat-e-Islami approached them with a proposal for talks, and the PTI formed a three-member committee to negotiate with the government. However, there is a divide among the ruling allies on holding talks with the opposition.

Pakistani envoy returns to Kabul after 5 months; Afghanistan welcomes development

ISLAMABAD: In a positive development, Pakistan Embassy’s chargé d’affaires in Afghanistan Ubaid Ur Rehman Nizamani assumed charge of his office five months after he was attacked in Kabul.

Ubaid Ur Rehman Nizamani survived unhurt then but one security guard suffered critical injuries in the attack on December 2.

The Foreign Office had then confirmed that the target of the attack was Nizamani. Later, the Khorasan chapter of the banned militant outfit Daesh accepted responsibility for the attack, which happened a month after the Pakistan diplomat had taken charge of his office.

Until November 4, 2022, before him, Mansoor Ahmed Khan had been the head of the Pakistani mission in Kabul.

Diplomatic sources said on Tuesday that the resumption of office by the Pakistani diplomat in Kabul was an important development prior to a visit by Afghanistan’s acting foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, who is scheduled to arrive in Islamabad with his country’s delegation in the first week of May.

It is also important to note that Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari had a telephone discussion with his Afghan counterpart last week.

Pakistan has blamed Afghan leaders for failing to fulfil their commitment to stopping terror attacks originating from their soil and warned of taking action.

After assuming the charge, the Pakistani diplomat called on the Afghan foreign minister and “discussed a wide range of issues of mutual interest”.

The diplomat also presented Quranic calligraphy by renowned Pakistani artists Asghar Ali and Naqash e Masjid-e-Nabvi.

In a separate statement, Afghan Foreign Office Spokesperson Abdul Qahar Balkhi said that Ubair ur Rehman met Amir Khan Muttaqi after returning to Kabul.

“Welcoming the Pakistani diplomat, FM Muttaqi expressed hope that his return will positively impact bilateral diplomatic relations,” he said.

During the meeting, FM Muttaqi termed the release of the majority of Afghans from Karachi prisons a positive step, calling for the remaining to be freed before the arrival of Eid ul Fitr.

The Afghan foreign minister also encouraged Nizamani to “further increase transparency in the visa issuance process”.

On his part, Nizamani also expressed hope that the relations between the two countries would improve with his return, adding that the Pakistani Embassy will work together with MoFA Afghanistan on a mechanism to facilitate visas.

Beijing hospital fire death toll rises to 29, director detained

The fire at the Beijing Changfeng Hospital in the Fengtai District broke out at around 1pm (5am GMT) on Tuesday and was extinguished about half an hour later.

Li Zongrong, deputy mayor of the district, expressed his “deep condolences” as he announced the new toll at a press conference.

Twelve people, including the facility’s director, have been detained in connection with the fire, said Sun Haitao from Beijing’s public security bureau, adding that representatives from a company renovating the hospital were among those being held.

State broadcaster CCTV reported that a preliminary probe revealed the blaze had been caused by “sparks generated during the internal renovation and construction of the inpatient department of the hospital”.

The sparks “ignited the volatiles of the flammable paint on the site”, CCTV said.

Social media users posted videos on Tuesday of people sitting on external air conditioning units, while others clinging to ropes jumped from the building.

 

The victims were 16 women and 13 men, Li said. “We feel deep remorse and guilt,” he told journalists.

“On behalf of the Fengtai district party committee and district government, I hereby express our deep condolences for the victims, and express our sincere respects to the victims’ families, the injured and their relatives, and apologise to the people of the whole city.”

39 hospitalised

CCTV reported that out of the 29 dead, 26 were patients at the hospital, two were hospital staff and one was a patient’s family member.

There were still 78 patients being treated at the hospital, who have been moved to the facility’s west building, CCTV said.

State-run People’s Daily reported that as of Wednesday morning 39 people were being treated in the hospital with injuries, and another three had been discharged.

 

Top city officials visited the hospital shortly after the fire, with Beijing party secretary Yin Li vowing to “quickly identify the cause of the accident and hold the relevant responsible persons accountable”, according to the Beijing Daily.

AFP journalists on Wednesday saw dozens of onlookers outside the entrance to the hospital, where a large number of police officers were stationed, discouraging people from taking photos.

Some of the hospital’s windows appeared blackened and at least one was broken, with soot marks visible on parts of the facade.

Many family members have lost contact with patients, with the missing being mostly older people with mobility problems, the China Youth Daily said in a separate report on Wednesday.

A police officer on the scene on Wednesday told AFP that the city “will probably make the appropriate arrangements” to take care of victims’ relatives.

Beijing Changfeng Hospital is located in the capital’s western urban area, about 25 minutes by car from Tiananmen Square.

Deadly fires are common in China due to weak safety standards and lax enforcement.

Ten people died in an apartment block blaze in northwestern Xinjiang in November, sparking protests against Covid-19 lockdowns blamed for hindering rescue efforts.

And 38 people were killed in a fire at a factory in central China, also in November, with authorities blaming workers for illegal welding.

India to have 2.9m more people than China by mid-2023, UN estimate shows

The demographic data from the United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA) State of World Population Report, 2023 estimates India’s population at 1,428.6m or 1.4286 billion against 1.4257bn for China.

The United States is a distant third, with an estimated population of 340m, the data showed. The data reflects information available as of February 2023, the report said.

 

Population experts using previous data from the UN have projected India would go past China this month. But the latest report from the global body did not specify a date for when the change would take place.

UN population officials have said it was not possible to specify a date due to “uncertainty” about the data coming out of India and China, especially since India’s last census was conducted in 2011 and the next one due in 2021 has been delayed due to the pandemic.

Although India and China will account for more than one-third of the estimated global population of 8.045bn, the population growth in both Asian giants has been slowing, at a much faster pace in China than in India.

Last year, China’s population fell for the first time in six decades, a historic turn that is expected to mark the start of a long period of decline in its citizen numbers with profound implications for its economy and the world.

India’s annual population growth has averaged 1.2 per cent since 2011, compared with 1.7pc in the 10 years previously, according to government data.

“The Indian survey findings suggest that population anxieties have seeped into large portions of the general public,” Andrea Wojnar, Representative for UNFPA India, said in a statement.

“Yet, population numbers should not trigger anxiety or create alarm. Instead, they should be seen as a symbol of progress, development, and aspirations if individual rights and choices are being upheld,” she said.

Israeli forces shoot 7 Palestinians in occupied West Bank

The ministry reported “six minor injuries from live fire” reached a governmental hospital in Jenin, while another person shot had been admitted to a nearby hospital following the raid in the northern West Bank city.

A statement from the Israeli military said “security forces are currently operating in the Jenin (refugee) camp”, without giving further details.

There was no immediate confirmation of the identity of those wounded in Jenin, a hotbed for Palestinian armed groups.

Two Israeli men sustain injuries in east Jerusalem attack blamed on Palestinians

Frequent incursions by Israeli forces have led to clashes with local youth or militants, with at least 25 Palestinians killed in the city this year and no Israeli fatalities.

The latest raid comes amid a spike in violence in Israel and the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since the 1967 war.

The conflict has claimed the lives of at least 96 Palestinians, 19 Israelis, one Ukrainian and one Italian this year, according to an AFP count based on Israeli and Palestinian official sources.

Two Israelis wounded

A suspected Palestinian gunman wounded two Israeli men near a Jewish site in annexed east Jerusalem on Tuesday, Israeli authorities said, with security forces conducting a manhunt for the perpetrator.

The shooting comes amid a period of deadly attacks and military raids across the occupied West Bank, along with killings in Israel.

Israeli police announced a suspected “shooting terror attack” in the Sheikh Jarrah neighbourhood of east Jerusalem targeting two motorists, who according to medics were rushed to hospital.

“Police officers are at the scene conducting searches for the suspect who fled,” the force said in a statement.

Israeli security forces closed off streets in the neighbourhood, where an AFP journalist saw officers entering a Palestinian home, with a drone and helicopter as well as police dogs aiding the search.

Officers enforcing the shutdown prevented cars and people from moving in the centre of the neighbourhood, as heavily armed forces combed the area.

Police announced they had found the perpetrator’s gun near the scene of the attack, which took place near the tomb of Simeon the Just — Shimon Hatzadik in Hebrew — a site frequented by religious Jews. The weapon was identified as a Carlo makeshift submachine gun, which Palestinians manufacture in the West Bank.

Hadassah hospital said they received a 48-year-old gunshot victim lightly wounded, and Shaare Zedek medical centre said it was treating a man in his 50s in moderate condition.

Two-minute siren

The search was punctuated by a two-minute siren marking Israel’s Holocaust Remembrance Day, honouring more than six million Jews killed by the Nazis during World War II. Jerusalem mayor Moshe Lion, speaking at a city hall ceremony, said one of the Holocaust’s main lessons was “to never be helpless in the face of those seeking to harm us”.

Later in the morning, most of the security forces had left Sheikh Jarrah, with roads reopened and traffic flowing as normal, a journalist said.

“Are you a degenerate,” asked the security officer interrogating a young bisexual woman arrested during the recent anti-government protests in Iran.

The interrogator had searched the woman’s phone and come across her intimate conversations with her girlfriend.

Warning: This article contains language that some readers may find offensive.

“What the hell are these chats? Are you a degenerate?” repeated the interrogator, his voice laced with disgust and using an offensive and derogatory Persian word which describes any form of same-sex attraction.

Now out of prison on bail, the woman, who is in her 20s, tells the BBC that she dodged the question by describing the conversation as “jokes that are common between girls”.

She says that the officer appeared to be focused on pressing charges related to the protests and therefore did not pursue the allegations of homosexuality.

Iranian law, which is based on Sharia, considers same-sex relations as crimes that carry a maximum penalty of death.

“But he kept pounding me with that question: ‘Are you a degenerate?’ He also mentioned my girlfriend’s name here and there, asking questions about her sexuality,” she says.

She had planned to make a rainbow-coloured LGBTQ Pride flag and take it to protests. “But I got arrested and a lot has happened since,” she says.

Pointing to the defiant spirit of the younger generations in Iran, she says that it came as no surprise that the LGBTQ community was “more visible during the recent protests”, especially since the movement “has roots in the struggle for human rights”.

In her opinion, this displays “unparalleled courage” of the younger generations and the gulf between them and the top echelons of the Islamic Republic, many of whom are now in their 80s.

“This generation does not bend before barbaric laws and norms. It is bent on consistently remaining true to itself. It stands tall and demands recognition.”

The protests swept across the country following the death in custody in September of Mahsa Amini, a young ethnic Kurdish woman who was detained by morality police for allegedly wearing her hijab “improperly”.

 

The Islamic Republic has responded with deadly force.

According to the Human Rights Activists’ News Agency (HRANA), security forces have killed at least 530 protesters – including 71 children – since the protests began. Four men have been executed on protest-related charges following trials that the UN says were unfair and based on forced confessions. Dozens of others who have been convicted are at risk of execution.

‘Queer, Life, Freedom’

During the protest movement, young LGBTQ people have defied the regime’s bans on public shows of affection and same-sex intimacy by removing their hijab and kissing each other in public.

Others have taken to streets with placards in the colours of the Pride and trans flags, reading “Woman, Life, Freedom” – the de facto slogan of the protest movement – as well as “Queer, Life, Freedom”.

Queer is an offensive word to some, but for others it is the preferred term to describe their sexual orientation or gender identity.

A young LGBTQ person holds up a trans flag reading “#queer – life – freedom”

Photos have shown activists spray-painting pro-LGBTQ slogans on walls at universities and in parks, including: “Queer, Trans, Freedom”, “The LGBTQ community rises”, and “This is the voice of the LGBTQ community: liberation or setting the night on fire”.

Others have handed out flyers to people on the streets that are hand-painted in the colours of the Pride flag and read: “The Iranian LGBTQ family stands by you.”

Many Iranians on social media have warmly welcomed the increased visibility of the LGBTQ community. Yet the move has triggered a backlash from others.

In addition to the outright homophobic reactions, an old question has resurfaced: “Is it the ‘right time’ to speak of LGBTQ rights in Iran?”

Similar questions have reverberated through Iran’s modern history whenever marginalised groups have demanded rights.

“Is this the right time for that?” was used by many political parties to gag feminists when thousands protested against the introduction of the mandatory hijab rules following the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Afsaneh Rigot, a researcher in technology, law and human rights at Harvard University, says: “Seen globally, queer people in Iran face some of the harshest penalties for their existence.”

“They are also criminalised in multiple ways, not only under oppressive laws generally criminalising freedom of expression on and offline, but also laws directly criminalising their identities,” she adds.

These include wearing clothes considered female if a person is assigned male at birth.

Other same-sex acts that are criminalised include same-sex “kissing or touching as a result of lust” and are punishable by flogging. These penalties also apply to children under the age of 18.

A trans non-binary activist in Iran in their early 20s, who say they are defying pressure from the “guardians of cis-heteronormativity”, describe the increased visibility of the LGBTQ community as the “rainbow wave”.

They also note that in response, top officials of the Islamic Republic are intensifying their homophobic rhetoric.

In a speech in Tehran on the anniversary of the revolution on 11 February, President Ebrahim Raisi accused the West of “exploiting women” under the pretext of human rights.

He said those countries were in no place to “set norms for the world, since they are pushing humanity towards the brink of extinction by promoting immoral behaviour like homosexuality”.

Despite all the headwinds, Iran’s LGBTQ community is determined to not be pushed back into the closet again.

Recently, dozens helped a gay beauty blogger make a video collage in which each of them repeated a single sentence: “We are countless.”

The BBC has withheld the identities of some of the people quoted in this article for their own safety.

Scotland’s controversial deposit return scheme will now not launch until March of next year, the country’s first minister has announced.

The scheme, which is aimed at increasing the number of single-use drinks bottle and cans that are recycled, was due to start in August.

But it has faced fierce opposition from many small breweries and distillers.

Humza Yousaf announced the delay as he set out his priorities for his government over the next three years.

Mr Yousaf also confirmed that proposals to restrict alcohol advertising will be sent “back to the drawing board” as part of his efforts to “reset” the government’s relationship with business.

And a six-month trial will see peak rail fares scrapped across the ScotRail network from October.

His statement was largely overshadowed by the arrest of the SNP’s treasurer, Colin Beattie, on Tuesday morning by police officers who are investigating the party’s finances.

The deposit return scheme will see 20p added to the price of a single-use drinks container, which will be refunded to people who return the container to retailer or hospitality premises that offer single-use products.

Some retailers will accept returns over the counter while larger stores, shopping centres and community hubs will operate automated receiving points known as reverse vending machines (RVMs).Bottles and cans could be returned over the counter or through reverse vending machines

Many small businesses fear it will place extra costs and other burdens on them at a time when they are already struggling.

And there have been concerns that thousands of firms could end up being forced out of the Scottish market, and that many products will disappear from the shelves.

The scheme will also require Westminster to grant an exemption to the UK-wide Internal Market Act given possible implications elsewhere in the UK

Mr Yousaf said he remained committed to the deposit return scheme “as a way to increase recycling, reduce litter and help achieve our net zero ambitions”.

He added: “We recognise the uncertainty that continues to be created as a result of the UK government delaying the decision to exclude the scheme from the Internal Market Act. We had hoped for that decision this week – but it has not come.”

The first minister also said that he and Circular Economy Minister Lorna Slater – the Scottish Green co-leader who has been driving the introduction of the scheme – had heard the concerns of business over its readiness for launch in August.

He said: “As a result, we will now delay the launch of the scheme to the 1st of March 2024. This provides 10 months for businesses to get ready.

“We will use that additional time to work with businesses, and Circularity Scotland, to address concerns with the scheme and ensure a successful launch next year.”

A package of measures, Mr Yousaf said, would also be put in place to “simplify and de-risk” the scheme.

Ms Slater will give further details on the new package and timetable for the scheme later this week.

The announcement came just minutes after former SNP minister Fergus Ewing described the scheme as a “Green poll tax”.

The Scotch Whisky Association welcomed the delay but stressed that it supported the principles of the deposit return scheme.

But it said the plan in its current form would “hamper the efforts of businesses across the country to reduce waste and bring about a more circular economy”.

The Night Time Industries Association said the scheme continued to be “fundamentally flawed and completely unworkable for large parts of our sector” and that a total redesign was needed.

The Federation of Small Businesses in Scotland welcomed the decision but called for the government to engage in “meaning conversation” to address business concerns.

Scottish Secretary Alister Jack also welcomed the pause and said the two governments now had “an opportunity to continue working together on solutions”.

SNP treasurer Colin Beattie was arrested by police hours before Mr Yousaf unveiled his plan for a “fresh start” for the government

Mr Yousaf also acknowledged that proposals to restrict alcohol advertising, including a ban on sponsorships for sport and live events and ending the sale of products with drinks firms’ logos on, had caused “real concern” to the industry.

He said: “I have therefore instructed my officials to take these ideas back to the drawing board, and to work with the industry, and with public health stakeholders, to agree a new set of proposals.

“I believe that all of us want to reduce the harm caused by alcohol, particularly to young people – but without undermining Scotland’s world-class drinks industry or tourism sector.”

The first minister said he hoped that a way forward could be found “which achieves both of those aims”.

He also confirmed that the legislation process another of his predecessor Nicola Sturgeon’s key but controversial policies – the creation of a new National Care Service – would take “slightly more time” to help build consensus on how it should operate.

And he said Scotland would be rejoining two international education league tables that it left in the wake of the country’s schools falling in the rankings.

Mr Yousaf had hoped his speech would allow him to set out what he was billing as a “fresh start for Scotland” after a tumultuous three weeks since he succeeded Ms Sturgeon as first minister and SNP leader.

He pledged his government would be “centred on the principles of equality, opportunity and community” and suggested tax increases could be on the way for higher earners, as he spoke of the need to be “bolder on taxation”.

Scottish Conservative MSP Maurice Golden responded to the delay, saying it would come as a “huge relief” to businesses and consumers.

He added: “Ministers urgently need to get back to the drawing board and come up with something that is radically better than what has been proposed so far.

“Their first port of call should be inviting Scottish business leaders to advise how best to move forward.”

There was a degree of inevitability that the first minister would announce a delay to the rollout of Scotland’s deposit return scheme.

The policy became a political football during the SNP leadership contest with all three candidates promising varying degrees of change.

Businesses have repeatedly raised concerns about how it will be administered with some suggesting smaller firms will be hit hardest.

But the tone of the announcement was interesting.

The delay isn’t because of those expressed business concerns – Humza Yousaf said – but because the UK government has failed so far to grant the legislation an exemption from the Internal Markets Act.

This week – we learned – ministers were anticipating a decision on the exemption from UK government counterparts.

The Scottish Greens are not happy and remember they are in government with the SNP in Scotland. In fact it’s one of their ministers who is responsible for this policy.

They say that climate action is being “held hostage” by the Tory government at Westminster and lay the blame squarely with them.

Presentational grey line

Mr Yousaf admitted to journalists earlier on Tuesday that Mr Beattie’s arrest was a “very serious matter indeed” and that the timing was “not ideal” in terms of his statement to parliament.

Mr Beattie’s arrest came two weeks after former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell – who is married to Nicola Sturgeon – was also arrested before later being released without charge pending further investigation.

Officers spent two days searching Mr Murrell and Ms Sturgeon’s home in Glasgow, and also searched the SNP’s headquarters in Edinburgh.

Police Scotland launched its Operation Branchform investigation into the SNP’s finances in July 2021 after receiving complaints about how more than £660,000 of donations for a second independence referendum campaign were used.