Royal Navy frigates could see “significant delays” as yard workers at Rosyth prepare to strike in a dispute over pay, union bosses have warned.

Unite said about 100 workers at the Fife yard employed by contractor Kaefer supported industrial action.

The union said workers were prepared to strike for 12 weeks to “get a decent wage rise”.

It claimed it would threaten progress on the £1.25bn frigate contract at the Babcock-owned yard.

About 98.4% of workers backed strike action. These include painters, cleaners, scaffolders and support service strike.

Unite said they would down tools between 17 April and 10 July.

After they announced plans to strike, staff were offered a below-inflation pay rise of 7.2%, which was rejected.

Regional industrial officer Bob MacGregor claimed the company refused to make any offer for months, then “panicked following the strike vote”.

He said: “Kaefer in turn are blaming Babcock who own the yard for this situation but it’s a mess they have jointly created.

“It’s a really shoddy way of managing industrial relations at Rosyth.

“The imminent strike action will have a knock-on effect for the Type 31 contract, and it will undoubtedly lead to significant delays.”

Babcock was awarded the frigate contract after a competition between rival consortia

The Royal Navy has ordered five Type 31 frigates, which are known as the Inspiration class. The 139m long vessels will carry 107 crew.

HMS Venturer is the first set to be built, followed by Active, Formidable, Bulldog and Campbeltown.

A Babcock spokesman said: “We are aware of the situation between Kaefer and their Unite members and will work with our sub-contractor to mitigate any impacts to our Rosyth operations.”

A spokesman for Kaefer said: “We continue to support constructive dialogue between Unite and Kaefer to reach a mutually acceptable resolution.

“The safety of our teams remains paramount and will not be affected by any potential industrial action.”

NSC decides to ‘speed up’ operation against terrorists

ISLAMABAD: The National Security Committee (NSC) — the country’s top security body comprising civil and military leadership — decided on Friday to “speed up” the operation against terrorists

The two-hour long NSC meeting was chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. According to sources, the meeting was attended by Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir, chairman joint chiefs of staff committee (CJCSC), heads of armed forces, federal ministers for defence, finance and information and senior military leadership.

According to sources, Director General of the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) Lt Gen Nadeem Anjum gave a detailed briefing on the ongoing operations against terrorism and the security situation of the country.

Officials, privy to the meeting and who spoke to Geo News on the condition of anonymity, stated that NSC reiterated that the zero-tolerance policy against terrorists would continue.

Sources shared, that in two-hour long meeting, Finance Minister Ishaq Dar also briefed the NSC on the economic situation of the country.

The detailed statement on the NSC meeting is yet to be issued.

Interestingly, the meeting was held as the nation passes through serious economic and political crises compounded by the recent Supreme Court verdict on the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) petition challenging delay in elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab.

The ruling coalition has firmly opposed the verdict which it believes is a minority verdict of 3-2 and should not be implemented.

NA resolution binds govt not to implement SC verdict

The meeting comes a day after the National Assembly passed a resolution rejecting the three-member Supreme Court bench’s “minority” verdict on the Punjab elections and made it binding on PM Shehbaz and his cabinet not to implement the decision.

The resolution moved by Balochistan Awami Party lawmaker Khalid Magsi was approved by a majority of the lawmakers.

It noted that the National Assembly on March 28 in a resolution had called on the Supreme Court to avoid “interfering” in political matters. It also observed that multiple sections of the society had repeatedly urged the apex court to form a full court bench but their calls were ignored and only one political party was heard in the case.

“Completely ignoring the clear resolution of the Parliament and the majority decision of the four judges of the Supreme Court, the three-member special bench enforced a minority opinion, which is a violation of the traditions, precedents and procedures of the Supreme Court,” noted the resolution. It added that a minority was imposed on the majority.

The resolution also expressed concerns over the Supreme Court’s circular setting aside the verdict of a three-member bench on suo motu cases. It also raised alarms over the formation of a controversial bench and its decision to quickly close the case that prompted Justice Qazi Faez Isa to suspend “suo motu” hearings.

The lower house of Parliament also aired fears over the “undue judicial interference in political matters”. It also pointed out that the “minority ruling” had given rise to political instability and paved the way for divisions in the federal units.

“This House considers the holding of general elections at the same time throughout the country as per the prevailing procedure mentioned in the constitution and law for political and economic stability in the country as the solution to all the problems,” noted the resolution.

The resolution also demanded the formation of a full court to review the “wrong interpretation” of Article 63-A.

Army vows to defend ‘sovereignty, territorial integrity’ of Pakistan

Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Asim Munir has said that the Pakistan Army is resolved to defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the homeland against all kinds of threats, a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said.

The army chief made the remarks while visiting forward areas along the Line of Control (LoC) on Thursday, the military’s media wing added.

 

General Munir said that the army is determined to support the just cause of Kashmiris and seeks a resolution of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) in accordance with the resolutions of the United Nations.

He emphasised troops to extend all-out support to the local population, remain steadfast and discharge duties with utmost sincerity and devotion, read the statement.

The COAS appreciated officers and men for maintaining continued vigil, remarkable operational preparedness and a high state of morale.

Earlier on arrival at LOC, Gen Munir was received by the Corps Commander Rawalpindi Corps. He met officers and troops on the forward positions and was briefed on the situation along the LoC and the operational preparedness of the deployed formations.

Some 10,000 Burmese people have fled to Thailand to escape fierce fighting between the military and units of a powerful ethnic armed group since Wednesday, Thai authorities said.

They are fleeing from Shwe Kokko town, controlled by a pro-military militia and home to Chinese-owned casinos.

This is one of the largest cross-border movements of people since a military coup two years ago.

The military has not released a statement yet about the fighting.

It is the latest in a civil war that has been raging since the coup in February 2021. Two years on, the military government has failed to impose its authority on large areas of the country. It is battling established ethnic armed groups in border areas that have been at war with the military for decades, and recently-formed anti-coup militias that call themselves People’s Defence Forces (PDFs) in much of the rest of the country.

Many thousands of people have been killed and some 1.4 million have been displaced since the coup. Nearly one third of the country’s population is in need of aid, according to the United Nations.

The latest fighting broke out after the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) and its allies launched attacks on military outposts and a gate camp near Shwe Kokko on Wednesday. More than 80 people have been killed on both sides, KNLA told BBC Thai.

Aid workers in the border regions – Thailand’s Mae Sot and Mae Ramat areas – have called for urgent humanitarian assistance as refugees seek shelter in schools, monasteries and rubber farms.

“In the long run, we need more donors,” said Kay Thi Htwe, a Burmese volunteer at a monastery in Mae Sot, which is hosting 500 refugees.

The KNLA has also closed the Myawaddy-Kawkareik Asia highway – one of the main roads to the border – for two weeks starting Friday.

Back in Shwe Kokko, the military-aligned Border Guard Forces which controls the enclave is protecting the casinos and warning residents to stay indoors.

This comes as the military continues to crush civilian resistance, targeting schools, clinics and villages.

Earlier this week, the military said it had arrested 15 teachers who had been giving online classes for a school backed by the exiled National Unity Government (NUG).

The teachers were taken from their homes in Mandalay, Saigang and Magway, a member of the General Strike Committee of Basic Education Workers told the BBC. In July, about 30 teachers were reportedly arrested because they worked for an NUG-recognised online school.

From the start, education has been a battleground in Myanmar. Teachers were among the first, along with health-workers, to walk out in protest against the coup, and were in the front line of the huge protests called by the Civil Disobedience Movement in the first weeks after the military takeover.

When that was crushed, most still refused orders by the military junta that they should return to work, and in May 2020 around 150,000 teachers and university lecturers were dismissed from their jobs. Many decided to go underground, joining schools and clinics in areas where communities had begun an armed struggle against military rule.

The military views the establishment of independent schools and clinics as an existential threat. Official figures suggest the number of students taking the 10th grade matriculation exam in state-run schools is now only one fifth of the number doing so before the coup. Teachers working outside the state sector have been branded as terrorists.

Biden report on Afghan pullout lays blame at Trump’s door

In a 12-page declassified summary of the report sent to Congress, the White House insisted that President Joe Biden’s administration had done everything it could.

It blamed a deal struck previously between Donald Trump’s administration and the Taliban for putting the incoming Biden government in an impossible position and it said that no intelligence agency had predicted such a catastrophic collapse of Afghan government forces.

“The departing Trump administration had left the Biden administration with a date for withdrawal, but no plan for executing it. And after four years of neglect — and in some cases deliberate degradation — crucial systems, offices, and agency functions that would be necessary for a safe and orderly departure were in disrepair,” the document said.

“After more than 20 years, more than $2 trillion dollars, and standing up an Afghan army of 300,000 soldiers, the speed and ease with which the Taliban took control of Afghanistan suggests that there was no scenario — except a permanent and significantly expanded US military presence — that would have changed the trajectory,” it said.

The report does fault overly optimistic intelligence community assessments about the Afghan army’s willingness to fight, and says Biden followed military commanders’ recommendations for the pacing of the drawdown of US forces.

“America is on a stronger strategic footing more capable to support Ukraine and to meet our security commitments around the world, as well as the competition with China, because it is not fighting a ground war in Afghanistan,” John Kirby, the National Security Council spokesman, said on Thursday.

The pullout, ending on Aug 30, 2021, shocked Americans and US allies as the Taliban swept aside Western-trained Afghan forces within weeks, forcing the last US troops to mount a desperate evacuation from Kabul’s airport.

India and China spar over visas for their journalists

The exchange came days after India objected to China renaming or “standardising” names of 11 locations in the eastern state of Arunchal Pradesh, which China calls southern Tibet and claims as its territory.

Indian newspapers repor­t­ed this week that two Indian journalists posted in Beijing were barred from returning to their jobs in the Chinese capital from India.

Correspondents for The Hindu newspaper and state broadcaster Prasar Bharati were told on Tuesday that their visas have been frozen, an Indian source familiar with the issue said.

Asked about the visa suspensions, Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said on Thursday that Chinese journalists have received unfair and discriminatory treatment in India for a long time, and a Xinhua journalist was recently asked to leave India by March 31.

“China has always treated Indian journalists well,” Mao said. Chinese authorities have been in touch with the Indian government, which did not respond “nor correct the mistake”, she said.

“China therefore has to take corresponding counter measures to safeguard our legitimate interests. China welcomes Indian journalists to work in China. If India can correct its mistakes, China is willing to continue to facilitate Indian journalists in China,” Mao added.

The Israeli military has carried out air strikes on targets belonging to the Palestinian militant group Hamas in southern Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.

The military said the attacks were a response to a barrage of 34 rockets fired from Lebanon into northern Israel on Thursday, which it blamed on Hamas.

Militants in Gaza fired dozens more rockets after the strikes began.

Tensions are high following two nights of Israeli police raids at the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem earlier this week.

The raids triggered violent confrontations with Palestinians inside the mosque, which is Islam’s third holiest site, and caused anger across the region.

Hamas did not say that it fired the rockets from Lebanon, which was the biggest such barrage in 17 years.

But its leader Ismail Haniyeh, who was visiting Beirut at the time, said Palestinians would not “sit with their arms crossed” in the face of Israeli aggression.

Plumes of smoke were seen rising above Gaza City during the overnight Israeli strikes

Overnight, there were two or three explosions around the Rashidieh Palestinian refugee camp, 5km (3 miles) south of the Lebanese coastal city of Tyre.

Lebanese media also reported strikes on the outskirts of the village of al-Qulaila, another 4km further south. Photographs appeared to show that a small bridge was destroyed.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) tweeted that its warplanes struck “terrorist infrastructures belonging to Hamas” in Lebanon.

“The IDF will not allow the Hamas terrorist organization to operate from within Lebanon and hold the state of Lebanon responsible for every directed fire emanating from its territory,” it warned.

Hamas said it strongly condemned “the blatant Zionist aggression against Lebanon in the vicinity of Tyre at dawn today [Friday]”.

In Gaza, more than 10 Hamas targets were hit, including a shaft for an underground site to construct weapons, three other weapons workshops and an underground “terrorist tunnel”, the IDF said.

Many of the rockets fired from Gaza were intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome missile defence system

During the strikes, at least 44 rockets were fired from Gaza towards southern Israel, Israeli media reported.

Most were intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome defence system or fell in open areas, but at least one house in the city of Sderot was hit.

There were no immediate reports of any casualties from either the strikes or the overnight rocket fire.

A man was injured by shrapnel in northern Israel on Thursday afternoon as a result of the rocket fire from Lebanon. The Israeli military said 25 of the 34 rockets were intercepted, but that five hit Israeli territory.

In the north-western border town of Shlomi, the rockets left craters in the road, and damaged vehicles and a bank. A car was also damaged in the village of Fassuta.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised that Israel’s response would “exact a significant price from our enemies”.

Buildings and roads in the Israeli town of Shlomi were damaged by the rockets launched from Lebanon

An Israeli military spokesman said it believed Hamas was behind the attack and that it was possible the militant group Islamic Jihad was also involved.

He added that they assumed the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, which fought a month-long war with Israeli in 2006, knew about the attack, and they suspected there was also Iranian involvement.

The attack came hours after Hezbollah, which controls much of southern Lebanon, said it would support “all measures” taken by Palestinians “to protect worshippers and the al-Aqsa mosque and to deter the enemy from continuing its attacks”.

Lebanon’s Prime Minister, Najib Mikati, condemned any military operations its territory that “destabilise the situation”.

The Lebanese Army said the rockets were launched in the vicinity of al-Qulaila and two other border villages near Tyre – Maaliya and Zibqine.

It posted photos of launchpads and a number of unlaunched rockets that it said troops had found in al-Qulaila, Zibqine and further east, near Marjayoun.

As police officers sealed off the home of his predecessor and raided his party’s headquarters, Humza Yousaf conceded that the SNP was having a “difficult day”.

The new first minister made a bid for understatement of the year inside his opening week in office.

And he already has a stack of other issues piling up in his in-tray, with MSPs bickering about the SNP’s partnership with the Greens and a looming legal deadline in the row over Holyrood’s gender reforms.

How will these pressures weigh on the new SNP leader and first minister, and what could it all mean for Scotland going forward?

From stability to turmoil

Following on from almost 20 years of stability under Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon, perhaps the SNP was always destined for period of turmoil.

But the speed and scale of the meltdown in the wake of Ms Sturgeon’s departure has still shocked almost everyone in Scottish politics.

The leadership race itself was remarkably fiery, with serving finance secretary Kate Forbes torching her party’s record in government and Ash Regan claiming it had gone soft on independence.

Mr Yousaf was unashamedly the Sturgeon continuity candidate, but even he embraced the need for sweeping changes at SNP HQ following the resignation of chief executive Peter Murrell, who took responsibility for misleading the media over membership figures.

 

The new leader said that one of his first tasks would be to “get up to speed very quickly on the financial health of the party”, with a transparency review to be carried out.

But it was the review by Police Scotland which came to the fore in spectacularly public fashion.

Precisely which part of the party’s books are of interest to the police remains fairly opaque, and in any case it would be foolish to speculate when their investigation is live.

But it underlines the need for Mr Yousaf to get to grips with the governance of his party.

Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell and high profile roles in the SNP for years

The fall in membership subscriptions will have real financial implications, for all that nobody other than Mr Murrell will admit to having known about it.

And senior members have been raising questions about internal issues for some time. MP Douglas Chapman quit as Treasurer in 2021, saying he had not been given enough information to do the job; days later Joanna Cherry also left the National Executive Committee claiming she was unable to improve transparency and scrutiny.

Following his first NEC meeting on Saturday, Mr Yousaf said there were “lessons to be learned”, and that the party’s internal structures needed to carry the confidence of members and reflect the party’s “broad tent” approach.

If there is much to be done in-house at SNP HQ, there is also the issue of bringing the party’s representatives back together in parliament.

What are the looming issues?

Mr Yousaf failed to tempt Ms Forbes back into the cabinet with the offer of a demotion. Keith Brown – elected deputy leader of the SNP by members – also left the top team, while two other ministers turned down jobs in his administration.

There are some unhappy faces on the SNP’s back benches, and after decades of iron discipline they are no longer shy about speaking out. A former cabinet secretary, Fergus Ewing, appears to be openly campaigning against his party’s partnership with the Greens.

This kind of rebellious talk is the sort of thing Nicola Sturgeon never had to contend with – at least not until the final months of her reign, and the row over gender reform.

And that too is a looming issue for Mr Yousaf.

Ms Sturgeon’s team had hoped to put the issue to bed with a series of marathon parliamentary sessions in December, when MSPs passed the Gender Recognition Reform Bill.

But then the UK government blocked the legislation in an unprecedented show of constitutional muscle.

Protests took place outside the Scottish Parliament as MSPs discussed gender recognition reforms

Mr Yousaf has all but promised to challenge that veto in the courts, and the Greens have been clear they will quit the government if he does not.

The deadline for launching a judicial review is due in the coming weeks.

So before he even gets to his second Holyrood question session, Mr Yousaf will have to contemplate a courtroom showdown on a contentious issue which has already split his party.

Broadly, so far we have been talking about internal issues for the SNP. But there is clearly an external political impact too.

The image of that blue police tent being erected in Nicola Sturgeon’s drive was beamed out on TV and smartphone screens across the country.

What could that mean for her oft-cited legacy of electoral domination?

What are the polls suggestion?

Opposition groups have certainly detected an opportunity. Labour in particular are openly licking their chops and demanding the country go to the polls.

You can barely turn a street corner in Scotland these days without tripping over Sir Keir Starmer or Anas Sarwar.

Professor Sir John Curtice says the four polls since Ms Sturgeon quit suggest that support for the SNP has “eased significantly”, despite the fact backing for independence has not slipped.

He told the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme that those votes are “primarily going to the Labour Party”, with the SNP’s lead over their red rivals having halved since February.

Sir John also suggested that Mr Yousaf was not proving as popular with the public as some in the SNP had hoped, and that his association with the Sturgeon regime may now prove a hindrance rather than an asset.

Polls are of course just polls – momentary snapshots of a carefully weighted slice of public opinion.

We may well have a much more tangible test in the coming months though, on account of something else that happened during Mr Yousaf’s first week in office.

Margaret Ferrier, the MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton South, is facing a 30-day suspension from the House of Commons for breaking Covid rules – and thus potentially a recall petition and by-election.

Ms Ferrier now sits as an independent, but won the seat for the SNP with a majority of 9.7% in 2019. Having changed hands at the last three elections, it was already a key target for Labour.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, pictured with his Scottish counterpart Anas Sarwar, has undertaken a number of visits to Scotland

Should a contest come about, both the SNP and Labour will be absolutely desperate to win, and establish real electoral momentum.

If Labour can take the seat, Sir Keir will paint it as the first step on the road to Downing Street. If the SNP hold it, then Mr Yousaf can say he’s steadied the ship and could continue Ms Sturgeon’s run of extraordinary electoral success.

For all the talk of momentum, though, the next Holyrood election is not due until 2026. There may not be a general election until the start of 2025.

So for all the challenges which undoubtedly face Mr Yousaf, he does have some time to get to grips with the job and put his own stamp on the Scottish government.

We should also remember that he was the choice of the bulk of SNP parliamentarians, with by far the most endorsements, and was always the candidate best-placed to reunite the party.

Politics moves incredibly fast in this digital age. Never mind a week being a long time in politics, narratives can change overnight – for better or for worse.

Humza Yousaf has been around Scottish politics long enough to know that better than most. He said he felt like the “luckiest man in the world” when he became SNP leader, and for all the blows which followed he will not have felt his luck has run out just yet.

But he will be under no illusions that there may well be more “difficult days” ahead too.

National Security Committee meets tomorrow to hash out ‘ongoing situation’

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has convened a meeting of the National Security Committee (NSC) — the country’s top security body comprising civil and military leadership — to discuss the “ongoing situation” as the government locks hock horns with the Supreme Court over the election verdict.

Sources told Geo News that the NSC would meet tomorrow at the PM House during which the country’s prevailing situation will be discussed and decisions will be taken regarding the course of action to be taken by the government.

According to sources, the meeting will be attended by Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC), heads of armed forces, federal ministers for defence, finance and information and senior military leadership.

The meeting is convened as the nation passes through serious economic and political crises compounded by the recent Supreme Court verdict on the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) petition challenging delay in elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab.

The ruling coalition has firmly opposed the verdict which it believes is a minority verdict of 3-2 and should not be implemented.

Ruling alliance on warpath with SC

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif termed the apex court proceedings horrible and said the National Assembly would pass a resolution rejecting the verdict today.

“What happened in the SC proceedings, the history never witnessed such horrible scenes; it has been decided that the National Assembly will pass a resolution to reject the decision,” Shehbaz had said while addressing a consultative meeting of the senior leadership of government allies.

Those who attended the meeting included JUI-F chief Fazlur Rehman, Dr Farooq Sattar, Aftab Ahmed Khan Sherpao, Mian Iftikhar Hussain of ANP, top leadership of other coalition partners including PMLN Senior Vice President Maryam Nawaz, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah Khan and other cabinet members.

The meeting discussed different options to effectively respond to the verdict, while Maryam Nawaz took a stricter stance saying the government should go beyond merely rejecting the decision.

The prime minister noted that the National Assembly had been discussing what game was played with the Constitution and democracy, it had passed a resolution before the verdict and would pass another resolution on Thursday.

He had said the Supreme Court did not talk about the verdict dismissing the petition by a four to three majority, a shakeup of benches and also did not pay heed to requests for the constitution of a full court bench.

He said the political parties also pleaded on different occasions to become party to the case but their requests were also rejected, while a judge who previously regretted being a part of the bench joined the hearing.

He said according to the decision, the government had to make funds available for elections by April 10 and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had to apprise the court on April 11 and a final report was to be submitted to the chief election commissioner regarding the security measures by April 17.

“We are also holding discussions on this issue,” he said.

US lawmaker urges Pakistan political parties to obey SC rulings

The United States representative of California’s 32nd congressional district, Brad Sherman, has urged the political parties of Pakistan to abide by the rulings of the Supreme Court, as the political crisis in Pakistan deepens with the ruling alliance refusing to implement the top court’s verdict on provincial elections.

The US lawmaker discussed the SC’s order to conduct the Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa elections with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan on a phone call on Tuesday.

He reportedly encouraged the PTI chief to obey the rule of law and the verdict of the Supreme Court.

Taking to Twitter, Sherman shared some details of his conversation with the ousted prime minister. He said that he was surprised to know that Khan was working in the wee hours of the morning.

“For democracies to function, the parties must adhere to the rule of law and rulings of the Supreme Court,” Sherman wrote on Twitter.

It was a victory for PTI when the top court gave the verdict in the election delay case favouring the party, which has been demanding new polls in the country for almost a year.

The US congressmen and influential figures have lately been speaking in the favour of Imran Khan, especially since his party has engaged another lobbying firm in Washington.

Ruling alliance still smarting over SC verdict

Meanwhile, the coalition government is on a warpath with the SC after a three-judge bench unanimously declared as unconstitutional the Election Commission’s order to delay the elections in Punjab.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said, during a meeting of the coalition parties, that a mockery of the country’s Constitution and law was being made and the fate of the nation was being decided with strange decisions.

The meeting discussed different options to effectively respond to the verdict, while Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Maryam Nawaz took a stricter stance saying the government should go beyond merely rejecting the decision.

Shehbaz said the allied parties also held a consultative meeting with the lawyers’ community.

PML-N Quaid Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari participated in the meeting through a video link. Nawaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz insisted that a reference should be filed against the judges who were part of the three-member bench.

The other participants of the meeting were of the view that the parliament should assert its supremacy and there should be no apologetic approach while adopting a tough stance.