Beijing relies on Pakistan to project its might, Pentagon report notes

The China Military Power 2022 report — released here on Tuesday — examines how China seeks to achieve its “national rejuvenation” objective by 2049 with the help of international partners, such as Pakistan.

According to the report, China ranks Pakistan as its only “all-weather strategic partner” while Russia as its only “comprehensive strategic partner with coordination relations”.

During the last five years, China has expanded ties with both of its historical partners, Pakistan and Russia. Pakistan is also one of the places that China has likely “considered as locations for military logistics facilities”.

China Military Power notes that Beijing ranks Islamabad as its only ‘all-weather strategic partner’, ahead of Moscow

The report notes that China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is associated with pipelines and port construction projects in Pakistan. But with the help of those projects, China “seeks to become less reliant on transporting energy resources through strategic choke points, such as the Strait of Malacca”.

Beijing also attempts to exploit the relationships it builds through BRI to pursue additional economic cooperation with participating countries, the report adds.

It recalls that in 2021, 10 Chinese nationals were killed, and 26 others injured when a suicide bomber targeted a workers’ bus on its way to a BRI infrastructure development project in Pakistan.

The report, however, claims that China used this incident to “extend its ability to project military power to safeguard its overseas interests, including BRI, by developing closer regional and bilateral counterterrorism” cooperation with Pakistan.

Reviewing China’s growing military and economic cooperation with Pakistan, the report notes how Beijing helped Islamabad complete the in-orbit delivery of the Pakistan Remote-Sensing Satellite.

China also vigorously pursues its policy of supporting a BRI host-nation’s security forces through military aid, including military equipment donations.

The examples of China-Pakistan cooperation cited in the report include joint military exercises. It notes that in 2020-21, China participated in a joint naval exercise with Pakistan and also supplied strike-capable Caihong and Wing Loong Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Pakistan.

China also supplied major naval vessels to its partners, highlighted by Pakistan’s 2015 purchase of eight Yuan class submarines for more than $3 billion. In 2017 and 2018, China sold four naval frigates to Pakistan.

Under the PLANMC, which supports the PRC’s military diplomacy, Chinese forces have trained with Thai, Pakistani, Saudi Arabia’s, South African, and Djiboutian forces.

Pakistan is also a member of the China-led Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organisation.

The “Military and Sec­urity Developments Invo­lving the People’s Republic of China,” commonly known as the China Military Power Report (CMPR), is a Congressionally mandated document. It serves as an authoritative assessment of China’s military and security strategy.

The report follows the Pentagon’s release of the National Defence Strategy in October, which identified China as the “most consequential and systemic challenge” to US national security and a free and open international system.

The military power report covers the contours of the People’s Liberation Army’s way of war, surveys the PLA’s current activities and capabilities, and assesses its future military modernisation goals.

The Pentagon argues that China’s foreign policy seeks to build a “community of common destiny” that supports its strategy to realise “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”.

Beijing’s “revisionist ambition” for the international order derives from the objectives of its national strategy and the Communist Party’s political and governing systems, it said.

Modi’s home state Gujarat votes, seen as easy mid-term test for India’s leader

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has not lost in the western industrial state since 1995 and Modi served as its chief minister for nearly 13 years before becoming prime minister in 2014 after trouncing the Congress party.

Opinion polls conducted in the lead-up to the Gujarat polls projected the BJP to comfortably retain power in the state.

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which was formed only a decade ago and has claimed power in Delhi and the state of Punjab, is set to become one of the main opposition parties in Gujarat at the expense of Congress.

Early on Thursday, voters in Surat, the state’s second largest city and a diamond cutting and polishing hub, lined up to cast their ballot in the first of the two-phase election.

 

 

The city is expected to witness a three-way contest with Congress and AAP also looking to make inroads in the BJP bastion. The second phase of voting is on Tuesday and results are due on Dec. 8.

In the last state election five years ago, the BJP won 99 seats in the 182-member assembly while Congress got 77.

The BJP is expected to win between 131 to 139 seats this time, ABP-CVoter projected in November. Congress could win 31 to 39 seats while the Aam Aadmi Party could bag up to 15.

According to India TV-Matrize opinion poll, also conducted in November, the BJP may win up to 119 seats.

Modi remains popular in many parts of the country despite criticism of inflation and unemployment, and his party also expects to emerge victorious in state assembly elections in Himachal Pradesh in the north, which were held last month with results to be declared on Dec. 8.

AAP has promised voters subsidies on electricity and other bills in their bid to become the main challenger to the BJP.

Congress, on the other hand, launched a cross-country march in September against what it calls “hate and division”, hoping to revive its fortunes and regain some popularity.

Israel kills two Palestinians in West Bank raid, officials say

The Islamic Jihad group said in a statement that one of the men killed was its leader.

There was no immediate comment on the incident from the Israeli military.

Six Palestinians were killed in separate incidents earlier this week, amid spiralling violence in the West Bank

 

Israel has cracked down on protesters across the West Bank in near-daily raids that have often ended in deadly clashes, following a series of fatal street attacks in Israel earlier this year.

The Palestinian health ministry said 210 Palestinians have been killed this year, including those who died during a brief conflict in Gaza in August.

At the same time, 23 civilians and eight security personnel have been killed in attacks in Israel and the West Bank, according to Israeli military figures, which show 136 Palestinians killed but do not include Gaza casualties.

A landslide on a motorway in southern Brazil has killed at least two people and left dozens missing.

A torrent of mud fell on to the BR-376 highway in the state of Parana, hitting at least 16 vehicles, authorities said.

Rescue workers at the scene said bad weather and the remote location were complicating the search effort.

Local authorities told a news conference that between 30 and 50 people could be missing.

Emergency services have located six survivors, including the mayor of the coastal town of Guaratuba, Roberto Justus.

In a video posted on social media, Mr Justus said he was “alive by the grace of God”, according to AFP news agency.

“It was horrible,” he said. “The mountain just fell on top of us. It swept away every last car.”

Aerial images released by emergency services show the damage caused by the landslide on Monday night which swept away a section of the highway and the vehicles on it.

There are concerns there could be further landslides with national weather service INMET issuing heavy rain warnings for multiple states in Brazil.

MSPs have expressed “significant concern” over a lack of detail on how much Scotland’s new National Care Service will cost.

Holyrood’s finance committee said it was difficult to assess whether the service would be affordable or sustainable.

It called on the Scottish government to provide clarity before the parliament holds its first vote on the proposals.

The new service is intended to end the postcode lottery around access to care.

The proposals, which still need to be approved by the Scottish Parliament, would see a series of care boards set up that would operate in the same way as health boards.

It would mean that social care services would no longer be run by local councils, with government ministers directly responsible instead and up to 75,000 social work and social care staff transferring to the new bodies.

The government says the service will be the most significant change to care in Scotland since the creation of the NHS.

 

But it has faced calls to pause the plan amid uncertainty about the costs of involved in setting up and running the new service, and the implications for local decision-making.

The government has estimated that the care service will cost somewhere between £664 and £1.26bn over the next five years after initially putting the figure at about £500m.

In its report on the proposals, the committee said a financial memorandum from the government “does not provide an overall estimate of the costs of creating a National Care Service”.

The report added: “A large number of decisions are yet to be made and no estimates of costings have been provided for VAT liability, transfer of assets and staff and the creation of a health and social care record, all of which have the potential to result in significant costs.”

Mr Gibson said his committee had been unable to properly scrutine the proposals because of a lack of detail from the government

The report also said it was unclear whether inflation had been taken into account – and if so what assumptions had been made about what the inflation rate is likely to be.

It said it would have expected this work to have been done before the legislation to create the new service was introduced to parliament.

The committee’s convener, SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson, said: “We have to ensure it is affordable, we have to ensure it is sustainable and we have to be able to scrutinise the detail.

“The underlying costings for the Bill were not available on such issues as the transfer of assets and staff and potential VAT charges or a social care record and the IT system to back that up.

“We need to make sure that those resources are available and we need to have the information so we can scrutinise to ensure that is indeed the case for the people who are going to benefit for this service and for the taxpayers who will pay for it”.

The committee’s evidence sessions have previously heard calls for more money to be put into front-line social work services and service provision rather than on creating an entirely new service.

Martin Purchase has Parkinson’s and is cared for by his wife Fiona

Fiona Purchase cares for her husband Martin, who was diagnosed with Parkinson’s in 1995.

As Martin’s condition deteriorated, the couple were given a budget by their council social work department that allowed them to employ a personal assistant, who his wife describes as being “invaluable”.

But she said it took a long time for the support to be put in place, and described the budget available to them as being quite small given the extent of Martin’s care needs.

Fiona said she believes the difficulty in accessing support means many people simply give up before they get the help they need.

But despite initially being hopeful that the National Care Service would improve things, she is now having doubts about whether it will achieve what it is intended to do.

And she believes the government should immediately inject massive amounts of money into improving existing social care services rather than using it to set up a new service.

She added: “I am astonished that we’re not seeing that injection of funding right now with all the backlog in hospital discharges, for example, and with pressures on unpaid carers and the lack of funding for unpaid carers.

“Social care is so understaffed and people are leaving in droves.

“I wonder by the time the National Care Service develops what is going to be left of the care service that we have unless we see that money going in right now to provide better pay for social care staff and to provide more support for people who need it.”

Economists from the Fraser of Allander Institute warned the committee that the service is unlikely to be any better than the system it is replacing if it is not properly funded.

And the Audit Scotland public spending watchdog warned that “focusing on such a major transformation may divert attention from addressing the immediate challenges within the social care sector, including workforce issues and unmet demand for support”.

Audit Scotland also said that the “focus on improving lives should not be lost amid structural changes”.

Social Care Minister Kevin Stewart faced calls to pause the scheme when he appeared before the finance committee last month.

But he refused to do so despite admitting that there were still but “various unknowns” that could have an impact on the financial cost of setting it up.

The creation of a new national care service is supposed to be the flagship reform of this five-year term at Holyrood.

Few disagree with the overall aim of improving the standards and consistency of care services across Scotland and ending what’s sometimes called a postcode lottery of provision.

The problem is the Scottish government is proposing legislation to enable them to create the new service that leaves much of the detailed design to another day.

That means ministers cannot say how much the whole thing will cost, even if they insist it will be affordable and that they are not asking parliament for a blank cheque.

Holyrood’s finance committee is far from happy with that. With budget cuts elsewhere, MSPs want to be sure money earmarked for better care is not wasted on bureaucracy.

Speaking ahead of the report’s publication, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the National Care Service was about learning the lessons of the Covid pandemic and “making sure we have consistently high standards of care for elderly and vulnerable people across the country”.

She added: “There are a number of parliamentary committees scrutinising the legislation, as is right and proper.

“The government as it does with any legislation will reflect on any comments that come out of that process and reflect appropriately.”