Far-right leader Giorgia Meloni has claimed victory in Italy’s election, and is on course to become the country’s first female prime minister.

Ms Meloni is widely expected to form Italy’s most right-wing government since World War Two.

That will alarm much of Europe as Italy is the EU’s third-biggest economy.

However, speaking after the vote, Ms Meloni said her Brothers of Italy party would “govern for everyone” and would not betray people’s trust.

“Italians have sent a clear message in favour of a right-wing government led by Brothers of Italy,” she told reporters in Rome, holding up a sign saying “Thank you Italy”.

She is predicted to win up to 26% of the vote, based on provisional results, ahead of her closest rival Enrico Letta from the centre left.

Ms Meloni’s right-wing alliance – which also includes Matteo Salvini’s far-right League and former PM Silvio Berlusconi’s centre-right Forza Italia – now looks to have control of both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, with around 44% of the vote.

Her own party’s dramatic success in the vote disguised the fact that her allies performed poorly, with Mr Salvini’s party slipping below 9%, and Forza Italia even lower. Four years ago, Brothers of Italy won little more than 4% of the vote but this time benefited from staying out of the national unity government that collapsed in July.

The decision on who becomes Italy’s next leader is up to the president, Sergio Mattarella, and that will take time.

Although Giorgia Meloni has worked hard to soften her image, emphasising her support for Ukraine and diluting anti-EU rhetoric, she leads a party rooted in a post-war movement that rose out of dictator Benito Mussolini’s fascists.

Earlier this year she outlined her priorities in a raucous speech to Spain’s far-right Vox party: “Yes to the natural family, no to the LGBT lobby, yes to sexual identity, no to gender ideology… no to Islamist violence, yes to secure borders, no to mass migration… no to big international finance… no to the bureaucrats of Brussels!”

1px transparent line

The centre-left alliance was a long way behind the right with 26% of the vote and Democratic Party figure Debora Serracchiani said it was a sad evening for Italy. The right “has the majority in parliament, but not in the country”, she insisted.

The left failed to form a viable challenge with other parties after Italy’s 18-month unity government fell apart, and officials were downbeat even before the vote. The Five Star Movement under Giuseppe Conte won a convincing third place – but does not see eye to eye with Enrico Letta even though they have several policies in common on immigration and raising the minimum wage.

Turnout fell to a record low of 63.91% – nine points down on 2018. Voting levels were especially poor in southern regions including Sicily.

Italy is a founding father of the European Union and a member of Nato, and Ms Meloni’s rhetoric on the EU places her close to Hungary’s nationalist leader Viktor Orban.

Her allies have both had close ties with Russia. Mr Berlusconi, 85, claimed last week that Vladimir Putin was pushed into invading Ukraine while Mr Salvini has called into question Western sanctions on Moscow.

Ms Meloni wants to revisit Italian reforms agreed with the EU in return for almost €200bn (£178bn) in post-Covid recovery grants and loans, arguing that the energy crisis has changed the situation.

There was little cause for joy at Enrico Letta’s Democratic Party headquarters on Sunday night

The Hungarian prime minister’s long-serving political director, Balazs Orban, was quick to congratulate Italy’s right-wing parties: “We need more than ever friends who share a common vision and approach to Europe’s challenges.”

In France, Jordan Bardella of the far-right National Rally said Italian voters had given European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen a lesson in humility. She had earlier said Europe had “the tools” to respond if Italy went in a “difficult direction”.

However, Prof Gianluca Passarrelli of Rome’s Sapienza University told the BBC he thought she would avoid rocking the boat on Europe and focus on other policies: “I think we will see more restrictions on civil rights and policies on LGBT and immigrants.”

Mr Salvini will be hoping to return to the interior ministry to halt migrant boats crossing from Libya.

This election marks a one-third reduction in the size of the two houses, and that appears to have benefited the winning parties.

A Rai TV exit poll suggested the three parties will hold 227-257 seats in the revamped 400-seat Chamber and 111-131 seats out of a total of 200 seats in the Senate. Mr Salvini said the right had a clear advantage in both houses.

The same Rai poll also reveals just how dominant the Meloni-led coalition is likely to be. The centre left will hold a mere 78-98 seats in the Chamber and 33-53 in the Senate, it says.

Scotland’s NHS staff could strike soon but it remains a “last resort”, a trade union leader has warned.

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said healthcare workers do not want to see longer waiting times and cancelled appointments, but told BBC Scotland they may be forced to act.

Unite is balloting NHS members on industrial action after a 5% pay increase was turned down last month.

She called on the Scottish government to table a “decent” pay offer.

The union said it had amassed a £50m strike fund.

“Strikes are a last resort but obviously I will back my members where they want to take that action,” Ms Graham said.

She insisted that union members “don’t want the consequences” of the pressure on services that strike action would bring.

It comes as Scotland reported its worst ever A&E waiting times last week, and the cost of living crisis is expected to place further strain on hospitals this winter.

She said: “It’s not very often that you get people in the NHS going out on strike. That is the reality, it’s a huge thing for them to do.

“But on the other side of that argument, you’ve got people with families, you’ve got people who can’t feed their families.”

Healthcare staff from five unions are being balloted on industrial action

Ms Graham pointed to a Unite survey that suggests more than 152,000 people (24%) in Glasgow are living in food poverty, while more than 82,000 (13%) cannot afford pay their household bills.

“People feel that they are in food poverty right this moment – they can’t afford to take any more pay cuts.

“Of course we don’t want that sort of disruption, so I would say to the respective governments come to the table and put decent pay offers down.”

Healthcare staff from Unite and four other unions are being balloted on industrial action after rejecting the Scottish government’s pay deal.

Unison, GMB, Royal College of Nursing (RCN) and the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy also condemned the 5% offer.

 

Health Secretary Humza Yousaf said: “While we respect the mandate given to trade unions, I am disappointed they voted to reject the record 5% pay deal for NHS Scotland Agenda for Change staff, and are now holding ballots for industrial action.

“We are re-engaging with Trade Unions in the hope of reaching a satisfactory outcome.”

Ms Graham, who spoke to BBC Scotland at Unite’s Scottish policy conference in Glasgow, also took aim at Prime Minister Liz Truss over the UK government’s mini-budget last week

She said the tax cuts for the most wealthy in England and Wales represent a “bonanza for the rich”.

The union leader was also asked her view on a second Scottish independence referendum.

She said: “I don’t think the general secretary in London should be telling people in Scotland what they should or shouldn’t be doing on indyref2.

“In the first instance that’s my Scottish members who will tell me that and from there the Scottish people will decide.”

Labour’s former shadow chancellor has suggested leader Sir Keir Starmer was acting like a monarch in a rift over the party’s policy on electoral reform.

John McDonnell is backing a proposed change to Labour’s position on the UK’s voting system.

At Labour’s conference, he said policy decisions were taken democratically and “no-one is above that”.

But Sir Keir has said electoral reform was not a priority under his leadership.

The Labour leader is facing increasing pressure to drop the party’s historical support for the first-past-the-post voting system used for general elections in the UK.

MPs from all wings of the party have been urging him to instead embrace some level of proportional representation.

Proportional representation, or PR, is the idea that the seats in Parliament should reflect the number of votes cast.

Democracies around the world use various polling methods that ensure that voters feel their vote counts – in some cases it is simply that they indicate a second-choice candidate that they can show their backing for once their preferred choice is out of the running. This is not strictly proportional representation but is often put forward by supporters of PR as a fairer method of representing voters’ wishes.

 

The Labour for a New Democracy campaign wants the leadership to back the introduction of PR its next election manifesto.

Labour members are set to debate support for this at Labour’s conference in Liverpool, where the proposal will be voted on this week.

But Labour sources have suggested that PR will not be put in the manifesto, even if members vote for it at conference.

In an interview with the Observer newspaper this week, Sir Keir suggested he would not put a pledge for electoral reform in Labour’s manifesto.

Appearing at a pro-PR rally organised by Labour for a New Democracy, Mr McDonnell said he had seen Sir Keir’s comments.

“I think we just have to remind, as gently as we can, that all our decisions are taken democratically,” Mr McDonnell said.

“I think Keir’s been mixing with the royalty too much for the last few days. He’s not a feudal monarchy.

“He’s an elected leader of the party, accountable to the party and accountable to all of us.

“We have a democratic structure by which we determine those decisions. I hope that we’ll be able to reflect that in a constructive dialogue.”

He said he was confident PR would be in the party’s manifesto by the next annual conference.

Mr McDonnell was one of the architects of Labour’s 2017 and 2019 election manifestos under previous leader, left-wing MP Jeremy Corbyn.

The BBC has asked Labour for comment on Mr McDonnell’s remarks.


Sir Keir has said electoral reform was not a priority for him

Other Labour MPs appeared at the event to show their support for the motion to include PR in the next manifesto.

Among them was Stephen Kinnock, who said PR had “such a force of logic and clear rationality in terms of why it is the right thing to do”.

“There is a basic democratic argument which is that every vote should count equally,” Mr Kinnock said.

The MP for Nottingham East, Nadia Whittome, said the campaign for PR “has united all tendencies of the Labour Party, different parts of the left, the right and the centre”.

“This isn’t about where we come from in the party, it’s about building a more democratic society,” she said.

At last year’s conference, about 80% of constituency party delegates voted in favour of embracing PR.

The proposal was defeated after unions opposed the move.

Since then, three of the biggest five unions linked to Labour have changed their stance, putting pressure on the party’s leadership to follow suit.

Pakistan seeks climate justice, not damages, says Bilawal

“We are not actively seeking climate reparations,” he told journalists at a news conference at UN headquarters in New York. “No one has thus far been successful in getting reparations. It’s a tall ask. We are seeking realistic climate justice.”

The foreign minister also referred to the UN secretary general’s recent suggestion of a climate-swap, countries trading their debt for climate-friendly policies.

As a UNDP report circulated by the media on Friday suggested that cash-strapped Pakistan needs to restructure its debt to avoid a default, Mr Bhutto-Zardari explained that Pakistan was not seeking restructuring of its debts as it could cause some to speculate that the country was going to default. “Let me make it clear. We’re nowhere near a default,” he said.

Says Imran removed from office through democratic process

Explaining the fine difference between reparations and justice, his own address to the 77th UNGA focused on underlining the sufferings of his nation.

The foreign minister, while addressing a gathering of US scholars and experts at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) on Thursday, also sought world’s support for flood victims in Pakistan. “The scale and magnitude of flood losses in Pakistan is huge and the international community’s support is vital to complement rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts,” he said. “More than financial assistance, Pakistan needs climate justice and a green plan to rebuild its infrastructure and economy.”

Responding to a question about the removal of the PTI government, Mr Bhutto-Zardari said: “For the first time in our history, a prime minister was not hanged or removed from office and sent in exile, [rather] he was removed through the democratic, constitutional process of a vote of no confidence.”

The PDM government, he said, has created a balance, setting up a democratic and peaceful system in the country. “But unfortunately the powers, which have never wanted democracy in Pakistan and never wanted this transition to take succeed, are consistently trying to undermine and reverse this progress,” he said.

He said Mr Khan wanted to bring the army, intelligence agencies and the judiciary under his personal control.

About the recent floods, he said Pakistan was the eighth most vulnerable country to climate change, with initial estimates pointed to losses in excess of $30 billion. He also highlighted the government’s measures in dealing with this calamity, despite challenges.

Appreciating the solidarity and support extended by the US for the flood survivors, the minister reiterated the importance Pakistan attached to its longstanding ties with the US and its commitment to reinforce this bilateral relationship. He also said Pakistan would continue to work with the international community to achieve peace, development, and stability in Afghanistan.

While reiterating Pakistan’s commitment to peace, he said rampant discrimination and persecution of Muslims in India, driven by the violent extremist ideology of Hindutva, was a matter of great concern.

He said in the occupied Kashmir, India was making demographic changes and disenfranchising the Muslims by redrawing the electoral constituencies.

He called on India to reverse the illegal and unilateral steps of Aug 5, 2019 and hoped that enabling conditions would be created for peace and stability in the region.

PM Shehbaz urges world to undo ‘climate injustice’

In his debut speech at the UN General Assembly, the prime minister also offered an olive branch to India, saying peace in the neighbourhood was necessary for progress and stability in the region.

“Why are my people paying the price of such high global warming through no fault of their own?” Mr Sharif asked.

“Nature has unleashed her fury on Pakistan without looking at our carbon footprint, which is next to nothing. Our actions did not contribute to this.”

Mr Sharif also talked about regional issues, like the Kashmir dispute and Afghanistan, but he remained focused of the sufferings caused by this year’s unprecedented rains and floods.

“As I stand here today to tell the story of my country, Pakistan, my heart and mind have not been able to leave home. No words can describe the shock we are living through or how the face of the country lies transformed,” he said.

Offers olive branch to India, says peace in neighbourhood necessary for progress, stability; makes impassioned plea for assistance

He said he came to the UN to “explain first hand” the scale and magnitude of this climate catastrophe that has pushed one-third of the country under water in a super storm that no one has seen in living memory.

“For 40 days and 40 nights a flood of biblical proportions poured down on us, smashing centuries of weather records, challenging everything we knew about disaster, and how to manage it,” the prime minister said.

“Even today, huge swathes of the country are still under water, submerged in an ocean of human suffering. In this ground zero of climate change, 33 million people, including women and children, are now at high risk from health hazards, with 650,000 women giving birth in makeshift tarpaulins.”

The prime minister said Pakistan had never seen a more stark and devastating example of the impact of Global Warming. “Life in Pakistan has changed forever.

People in Pakistan ask why, why has this happened to them? When global warming rips apart whole families and an entire country at this ferocious speed, it is time to ask why, and time to ask not what can be done but what MUST be done,” said Mr Sharif while explaining how this calamity had affected hearts and minds in Pakistan.

“The undeniable and inconvenient truth is that this calamity has not been triggered by anything we have done,” he explained. “Our glaciers are melting fast, our forests are burning, and our heatwaves have crossed 53 degrees Celsius, making us the hottest place on the planet.”

The prime minister explained that this year’s deluge was not a solitary incident. “Now, we live through an unprecedented monster monsoon. It is literally a monsoon on steroids, as the UN secretary general described it most befittingly. One thing is very clear: what happened in Pakistan will not stay in Pakistan,” he warned.

Referring to another recent statement by the UN secretary general, Mr Sharif said that hotspots like Pakistan fall in the list of 10 most climate-vulnerable countries, but emit less than one per cent of the greenhouse gasses that are burning the planet.

“It is, therefore, entirely reasonable to expect some approximation of justice for this loss and damage, not to mention building back better with resilience.”

Thanking the UN secretary general for visiting the flood-affected areas and those nations which sent help and their representatives to Pakistan, the prime minister said: “Clearly, the time for talk about actions has passed.”

The prime minister also expressed the fear that once flood subsides, people may forget the victims. “So my real worry is about the next stage of this challenge. When the cameras leave, and the story just shifts away to conflicts like the Ukraine, my question is, will we be left alone, to cope with a crisis we did not create?”

Mr Sharif said Pakistan’s urgent priority was to ensure rapid economic growth and lift millions out of destitution and hunger. “We look for peace with all our neighbours, including India. Sustainable peace and stability in South Asia, however, remains contingent upon a just and lasting solution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute,” he said, urging India to end this longstanding dispute by giving the inalienable right of self-determination to the people of held Kashmir.

The prime minister said Pakistan would also like to see an Afghanistan which was at peace with itself and the world, and “which respects and nurtures all its citizens, without regard to gender, ethnicity and religion”.

Saudi prince’s mediation signals ‘useful’ ties with Russia

Prince Mohammed may also find that the initiative — intentionally or otherwise — helps take him a step nearer international rehabilitation after the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi damaged his reputation, they say.

With the prince’s mediation, Russia on Wednesday released 10 foreigners it had captured in Ukraine, including five Britons and two Americans.

The move, apparently made possible by Prince Mohammed’s carefully nurtured ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin, coincided with a prisoner exchange involving 215 Ukrainians and 55 Russians and pro-Moscow Ukrainians that Turkiye helped broker.

Kristian Ulrichsen, a political scientist at Rice University’s Baker Institute in the United States, said the working relationship between Saudi Arabia and Russia appears to have been a crucial element in the choice of intermediary.

“By sanctioning this mediation and delivering results, Mohammed bin Salman is able to present himself as capable of playing the role of regional statesman in a way that counters the narrative of the crown prince as an impulsive and disruptive actor,” Ulrichsen said.

In remarks to the BBC, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said the motivation behind Saudi Arabia’s involvement in the prisoner release was humanitarian. He denied the Crown Prince had become involved to rehabilitate his reputation.

“That didn’t factor into it. I think that’s a very cynical view,” he said. He added that on the conflict itself, his country wanted to see a negotiated solution and Riyadh was committed to trying to help secure that outcome.

Prince Faisal said the crown prince had engaged with President Putin to work out a prisoner deal since April, when he “understood” the issue of the five British citizens following a visit to by then British prime minister Boris Johnson.

“His Royal Highness was able to convince President Putin that this is a humanitarian gesture that is worthwhile, and this is how we achieved this result,” Prince Faisal told Fox News.

The freed prisoners, who included a Croatian, a Moroccan, and a Swedish national, were flown to Riyadh on a Saudi plane where officials lined up to greet them.

US citizens Alexander Drueke, 39, and Andy Huynh, 27, both from Alabama, are expected to leave Saudi Arabia within days, officials said. The importance of Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, to both Washington and Moscow has grown at a time when Russia’s war in Ukraine is roiling global energy markets.

World leaders have beaten a path to Riyadh to ask for more oil production. But Saudi Arabia has shown little readiness to join the effort to isolate Russia. It has stepped up its cooperation with Putin, including within the OPEC+ oil producers group.

Russia starts annexation vote in Ukraine’s east; West calls it ‘sham’

The votes on whether the regions should become part of Russia began after Ukraine earlier this month recaptured large swathes of north-eastern territory in a counter-offensive against the invasion that began on Feb 24.

With Russian President Vladimir Putin also announcing a military draft this week to enlist 300,000 troops to fight in Ukraine, the Kremlin appears to be trying to regain the upper hand in the grinding conflict.

And by incorporating the four areas into Russia, Moscow could portray attacks to retake them as an attack on Russia itself, a warning to Kyiv and Western supporters.

Putin said on Wednesday Russia would “use all the means at our disposal” to protect itself, an allusion to nuclear weapons.

The war has already killed tens of thousands of people, uprooted millions and pummelled the global economy.

The referendums had been discussed for months by Moscow-installed authorities in the four regions — in Ukraine’s east and south-east — but Kyiv’s recent battlefield victories prompted a scramble to schedule them.

Voting in the provinces of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, representing about 15 percent of Ukrainian territory, is due to run from Friday to Tuesday.

Serhiy Gaidai, Ukraine’s Luhansk region governor, said that in the town of Starobilsk, Russian authorities banned the population from leaving the city until Tuesday and armed groups had been sent to search homes and coerce people to get out to take part in the referendum.

“Today, the best thing for the people of Kherson would be not to open their doors,” said Yuriy Sobolevsky, the displaced Ukrainian first deputy chairman of the Kherson regional council, on messaging app Telegram.

The referendums have been condemned by Ukraine, Western leaders and the United Nations as an illegitimate, choreographed precursor to illegal annexation. There will be no independent observers, and much of the pre-war population has fled.

Coercion alleged

Gaidai said that in the Russian-held town of Bilovodsk, a company director told employees voting was compulsory and anyone refusing to take part would be fired and their names given to security services.

“The mood of the Russians is panicky because they were not ready to carry out so quickly this so-called referendum, there is no support, there’s not enough people,” Kherson’s Sobolevsky said on messaging app Telegram.

Gaidai decried the plebiscites as “elections without elections”. He said people were being forced to fill out “pieces of paper” without privacy in kitchens and residential yards, with towns sealed off so people could not leave to avoid voting.

South Korea’s President Yoon Suk-yeol has denied insulting US Congress in remarks made after meeting US President Joe Biden last week in New York.

He was caught on a hot mic and seen on camera seemingly calling US lawmakers a Korean word that can be translated as “idiots” or something much stronger.

The footage quickly went viral in South Korea.

But his spokeswoman says he had “no reason to talk about the US or utter the word ‘Biden'”.

The remark is said to have occurred as part of a conversation about Mr Biden’s drive to increase the US contribution to a global initiative known as the Global Fund, which would require congressional approval.

“How could Biden not lose face if these [expletive] do not pass it in Congress?,” Mr Yoon apparently said to his aides afterwards.

Presidential spokeswoman Kim Eun-hye said in New York on Thursday Mr Yoon did not actually say “Biden”, but a similar-sounding Korean word, and that he was referring to the South Korean parliament, not the US Congress.

Many were unconvinced by the government’s defence – an opposition MP said it was like telling Koreans they were “hearing impaired”.

Mr Yoon is a former prosecutor who only entered politics last year and won the presidential elections earlier this year by less than 1%.

He is known as being prone to gaffes and has been struggling with low approval ratings soon after being elected, correspondents say.

He also drew criticism for failing to attend the Queen’s lying-in-state on his first day in London, for which his office blamed traffic issues.

Last year, he had to backtrack on his comment that the authoritarian president Chun Doo-hwan, who was responsible for massacring protesters in 1980, was “good at politics”.

As Donald Trump’s legal woes mount, donors and the Republican party have paid millions in dollars of his legal fees.

His newest legal headache saw him and three of his children hit with a fraud lawsuit, which alleges they lied about the value of property “by billions”.

Financial data shows that he has already spent more than $1m (£890,000) of donations fighting the case in 2022.

Mr Trump has denied any wrongdoing.

The latest lawsuit, announced by New York state Attorney General Letitia James, was the culmination of a long-running civil investigation which began in 2019.

Funded by supporters’ donations

Millions of dollars spent combatting these charges have come from Mr Trump’s Save America political action committee (PAC) – which takes donations from Trump supporters across the country – Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings show.

Save America has paid more than $1.12m this year alone to law firms hired to defend Mr Trump in the New York case. As a so-called “Leadership PAC”, it can use money to pay for expenses that cannot be funded by campaign committees, such as some personal travel or some leadership expenses.

The website of Save America’s Joint Fundraising Committee – which contributes both to Save America and a second Trump PAC, Make America Great Again – makes no mention of legal bills, saying only that “the future of our Country [sic] is at stake and President Trump is calling on all Patriots to join his fight to Save America”.

Of the $1.12m spent, more than $942,000 has gone to the firm of Alina Habba, a New Jersey-based attorney who has doubled as a Trump spokeswoman.

Another lawyer, New York-based Alan Futerfas, received nearly $185,000 in July. Mr Futerfas is representing Mr Trump’s children – Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric – in the New York fraud case.

It is unclear how much of his own money Mr Trump has spent on his legal cases.

One donor told the BBC the idea of funding the lawsuits didn’t bother him at all.

“In my opinion, he can do whatever he wants with the money,” said Rom Solene, a Republican from Arizona.

“The non-stop nonsense and antics being conducted by the Democrats on a man who no longer holds political office shows the extent to which the Democrats are willing to go to persecute a political opponent. Not to mention, it shows how much the Democrats and other Washington insiders fear Mr Trump.”

The fraud investigation is just one of several expensive legal challenges facing the former president, however.

The other cases include:

  • A criminal investigation into possible property crimes, which is linked to the civil fraud case in New York. The state attorney general referred evidence to federal prosecutors and the Internal Revenue Service. The Manhattan District Attorney’s office is also investigating.
  • Allegations Mr Trump mishandled classified documents, which saw FBI agents search his Mar-a-Lago property on 8 August. He is also being investigated for obstruction of justice.
  • The chief prosecutor of Georgia’s Fulton County is investigating potential state election crimes related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Part of this revolves around a phone call, in which the former president told a top state election official to “find 11,780 votes”.
  • A congressional committee has accused Mr Trump of inciting “an insurrection” when his supporters ransacked the Capitol on 6 January 2021. There have been no charges arising from this investigation, which is ongoing.
  • Various lawsuits by police officers who have accused Mr Trump of inciting the 6 January attack in which they suffered injuries.

In August alone, Mr Trump spent more than $3.8m on legal fees in the wake of the FBI’s search of his Palm Beach estate, Mar-a-Lago, the bulk of which – about $3m – went to a nearby Florida firm.

Smaller amounts went to lawyers involved in his other legal issues, including a Georgia investigation into whether he and his allies tried to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

But there is no indication the former president’s method of settling his legal bills violates any statute.

Erin Chlopak, a campaign finance expert at the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington DC-based non-profit, told the BBC that legal expenses often fall into a “grey area”, where it is left up to the Electoral Commission to decide if the expense is “personal” or whether it would exist “irrespective of a person’s status as a candidate or officeholder, in which case the money can be used”.

“That’s a real problem in campaign finance law,” Ms Chlopak said. “We’ve seen that not just in the context of legal expenses, but in even more blatant personal uses, like personal travel, dining out at expensive restaurants and staying in hotels.”

In Mr Trump’s case, Ms Chlopak added, the subject is complicated by the array of legal issues he is currently facing.

New York attorney general Letitia James wants the Trumps to repay $250m that she says was illegally obtained

“The results of applying the same standard would likely be different in circumstances related to business dealing that has nothing to do with one’s status as a former president, as opposed to actions that someone took based on their status as an officeholder.”

In the past, the Republican National Committee (RNC) has also helped pay for some of Mr Trump’s legal bills, including some related to the New York attorney general’s investigation.

In late August, however, Politico reported that the RNC would not pay legal fees related to the Mar-a-Lago search – and that it would completely stop paying legal fees if Mr Trump were to formally announce his intention to run for president in 2024.

Ms Chlopak noted that the RNC is free to use funds as it sees fit.

While he has hinted at the prospect, Mr Trump is yet to announce that he’ll run for the White House again in 2024.

Italy’s political leaders have brought their campaigns to a close ahead of pivotal elections on Sunday that could deliver the most right-wing government since the war.

Giorgia Meloni’s far-right Brothers of Italy are expected to win the race, and rival Giuseppe Conte told supporters the vote was of historic significance.

The end of the campaign was dominated by rows over Europe and Russia’s war.

But voters are most concerned about spiralling energy costs.

Bills are surging for homeowners and businesses alike. Selling ice cream from her small gelateria in the beach town of Ostia, Audrey said her energy bills had more than trebled to €6,000 (£5,350) a month.

The outgoing national unity government under Mario Draghi has already pledged €66bn (£59bn) to help Italians.

But, on the seafront in Ostia, Erica complained her shopping bills were going through the roof.

1px transparent line

The answer being offered by Giorgia Meloni is billions of euros of tax cuts and a flat tax for anyone earning less than €100,000.

At the last election she attracted a mere 4% of the vote but the last opinion polls produced more than two weeks ago gave her around 25%. She has benefited from being one of the few party leaders in opposition, while the others were taking part in the government.

Her party resents being linked to Italy’s wartime fascist past, but its roots lie in a movement that was born out of it. This week a Brothers of Italy (FdI) candidate was suspended for praising Hitler and Vladimir Putin.

Giorgia Meloni ended her campaign on the beach in Naples

But the main challenge to FdI’s right-wing alliance from the left has struggled to get off the ground because of infighting with possible allies.

Centre-left leader Enrico Letta took to the stage in Rome on Friday evening to the sound of an old wartime anti-Nazi Resistance anthem Bella Ciao.

Fellow left-wing figure Elly Schlein used the rally to challenge Giorgia Meloni’s hostility to what she terms the “LGBT lobby”. “I am a woman, I love another woman, but I am no less a woman for this,” said Ms Schlein.

The FdI leader has also attacked “gender ideology” and called for a naval blockade to stop migrants leaving Libya for Italy.

A native of Rome, unlike other leaders she chose to end her campaign away from the capital in the southern city of Naples. Southern Italy is distinctly poorer than the north, and she is facing stiff competition in the south from the Five Star Movement, which won the last election but has since lost ground.

1px transparent line

Five Star is now led by Giuseppe Conte who has several policies in common with the centre left. They both back a €9 minimum wage and making it easier for the children of immigrants to get citizenship.

At the time of the last opinion poll in early September, Five Star was reaching 14% and is thought to have impressed voters towards the end of the campaign. “They gave us up for dead,” he told supporters in Rome.

In a dig at Ms Meloni’s right-wing alliance, he said voters had a choice of raising the salaries of people earning €4 an hour or raising those who took home €10,000 a month.

The other two parties expected to form a government with her are Matteo Salvini’s far-right League and Silvio Berlusconi of the centre right, who has sought to attract younger voters by producing TikTok videos.

The most viral video of the 85-year-old former prime minister this week was of him swatting a fly with his hand during a live TV interview.

Both men have had close links to Russia’s Vladimir Putin in recent years, and Mr Berlusconi got into hot water on Friday when he claimed the man who invaded Ukraine had been pushed by his population and ministers. Mr Putin had aimed to replace the Kyiv leadership with “decent people” and then leave, Mr Berlusconi suggested.

Matteo Salvini spent the last hours of his election campaign accusing the European Commission of interfering in the race.

He reacted angrily after European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said Europe had “the tools” to respond if Italy took a nationalist stance in the same way as Hungary and Poland.

She added that the Commission was ready to work with any democratic government prepared to work with Brussels, but Mr Salvini said it was “shameful arrogance”.